Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing Solutions for the Generalized Hénon–Heiles System Through the Painlevé Test

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The generalized Hénon–Heiles system is considered. New special solutions for two nonintegrable cases are obtained using the Painlevé test. The solutions have the form of the Laurent series depending on three parameters. One parameter determines the singularity-point location, and the other two parameters determine the coefficients in the Laurent series. For certain values of these two parameters, the series becomes the Laurent series for the known exact solutions. It is established that such solutions do not exist in other nonintegrable cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. Kowalevski, Acta Math., 12, 177 (1889); 14, 81 (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Golubev, Lecture Notes on Integrating Equations of Motion of a Massive Solid Body Near Fixed Point [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow (1953); Reprinted by Regul. Chaotic Dyn., Moscow (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Goriely, Regul.Chaotic Dyn., 5, 1 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Golubev, Lecture Notes on the Analytical Theory of Differential Equations [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Hille, Ordinary Differential Equations in the Complex Domain, Wiley, New York (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Painlevé, Le¸cons sur la théorie analytique des Équations Différentelles (Le¸cons de Stockholm, 1895), Hermann, Paris (1896); Reprinted in:, Oeuvres de P.Painlevé, Vol. 1, Editions du CNRS, Paris (1973); Bull Soc.Math.France, 28, 201 (1900); Acta Math., 25, 1 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Bountis, H. Segur, and F. Vivaldi, Phys.Rev.A, 25, 1257 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ramani, B. Grammaticos, and T. Bountis, Phys.Rep., 180, 159 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Tabor, Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction, Wiley, New York (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Ercolani and E. D. Siggia, Phys.Lett.A, 119, 112 (1986); Phys.D, 34, 303 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Yoshida, Celest.Mech., 31, 363, 381 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Yoshida, Phys.D, 128, 53 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. V. Kozlov, Symmetry, Topology, and Resonances in Hamiltonian Mechanics [in Russian], Udmurtia State University, Izhevsk (1995); English transl., Springer, Berlin (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. J. Ablowitz, A. Ramani, and H. Segur, Lett.Nuovo Cimento, 23, 333 (1978); J.Math.Phys., 21, 715, 1006 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Weiss, M. Tabor, and G. Carnevale, J.Math.Phys., 24, 522 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Weiss, J.Math.Phys., 24, 1405 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. C. Newell, M. Tabor, and Y. B. Zeng, Phys.D, 29, 1 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Conte, A. P. Fordy, and A. Pickering, Phys.D, 69, 33 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Conte, ed., The Painlevé Property: One Century Later (CRM Ser. Math. Phys.), Springer, Berlin (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Conte, “Exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations by singularity analysis,” nlin.SI/0009024 (2000).

  21. J. Weiss, Phys.Lett.A, 102, 329 (1984); 105, 387 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Sahadevan, Theor.Math.Phys., 99, 776 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Springael, R. Conte, and M. Musette, Regul.Chaotic Dyn., 3, No. 1, 3 (1998); solv-int/9804008 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Contopoulos, Z.Astrophys., 49, 273 (1960); Astron.J., 68, 1 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Hénon and C. Heiles, Astron.J., 69, 73 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y. F. Chang, M. Tabor, J. Weiss, and G. Corliss, Phys.Lett.A, 85, 211 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. F. Chang, M. Tabor, and J. Weiss, J.Math.Phys., 23, 531 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Yu. Vernov, “The Painlevé analysis and special solutions for nonintegrable systems,” math-ph/0203003 (2002).

  29. D. L. Rod, J.Differential Equations, 14, 129 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Podolský and K. Veselý, Phys.Rev.D, 58, 081501 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. F. Kokubun, Phys.Rev.D, 57, 2610 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Guo and C. Grotta Ragazza, Comm.Pure Appl.Math., 49, 1145 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Tondo, Theor.Math.Phys., 99, 796 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Kokubun, Phys.Lett.A, 245, 358 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Conte, M. Musette, and C. Verhoeven, J.Math.Phys., 43, 1906 (2002); nlin.SI/0112030 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Erdélyi et al., eds., Higher Transcendental Functions (Based on notes left by H. Bateman), Vol. 3, McGraw-Hill, New York (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. I. Timoshkova, Astron.Rep., 43, 406 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. C. Hearn, REDUCE User's Manual Vers.3.6, RAND Publ., Santa Monica, Calif. (1995); http://www.unikoeln. de/REDUCE/3.6/doc/reduce/.

    Google Scholar 

  39. V. F. Edneral, A. P. Kryukov, and A. Ya. Rodionov, REDUCE: Programming Language for Analytical Calculations [in Russian], Moscow State University, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. A. Murav'ev and D. E. Burlankov, MATHEMATICA [in Russian], Regul. Chaotic Dyn., Moscow (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Melkonian, J.Nonlinear Math.Phys., 6, 139 (1999); math.DS/9904186 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Melkonian and A. Zypchen, Nonlinearity, 8, 1143 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

    S. Yu. Vernov

Authors
  1. S. Yu. Vernov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernov, S.Y. Constructing Solutions for the Generalized Hénon–Heiles System Through the Painlevé Test. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 135, 792–801 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024074702960

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024074702960

Search

Navigation