Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Dynamics of Abusive Lesbian Relationships: Preliminary Analysis of a Multisite, Qualitative Study

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary results from a multisite, qualitative study on violence in lesbian relationships. A framework for conducting community-based, empowerment research that draws on theories of community psychology, feminism, and postmodernism is presented. The study was designed to understand the dynamics of abusive lesbian relationships and social service providers' responses to the abuse. Results from 80 in-depth interviews with lesbians who have experienced relationship violence are examined with a particular focus on a pattern of first relationships being abusive and a theme of shifting power dynamics. Analysis of focus group discussions with 45 feminist service providers (e.g., counselors, shelter workers, social workers, healthcare providers) reveals the difficulties in assessing the power dynamics of abusive same-sex relationships and in developing appropriate responses when relying on heterosexually gendered models developed to address men's violence against women. The preliminary results present implications both for how we theorize and research this form of violence, and for improving the practices and policies of social services that work with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Banyard, V. L., & Miller, K. E. (1998). The powerful potential of qualitative research for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(4), 485–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, N. (1999, November 2). Rise in violence. Retrieved from http://gfn.com

  • Brand, P. A., & Kidd, A. H. (1986). Frequency of physical aggression in heterosexual and female homosexual dyads. Psychological Reports, 59, 1307–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M. (1998). Raising their voices: The politics of girls' anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (Ed.). (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, V. E. (1994). Lesbian battering: The relationship between personality and perpetuation of violence. Violence and Victims, 9(2), 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, D. H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeseredy, W. S. (1999). Tactics of the antifeminist backlash against Canadian national woman abuse surveys. Violence Against Women, 5(11), 1258–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, P. (1996). Shattering illusions: Same–sex domestic violence. In C. Renzetti & C. H. Miley (Eds.), Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships (pp. 1–8). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnets, L. D., & D' Augelli, A. R. (1994). Empowering lesbian and gay communities: A call for collaboration with community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(4), 447–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K. (1994). Domestic partner abuse: Expanding paradigms for understanding and intervention. Violence and Victims, 9(2), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N. (1989). Lesbian victims of relationship violence. Women and Therapy, 8, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. (1986). Lesbian battering: An examination. In K. Lobel (Ed.), Naming the violence (pp. 173–189). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (1996). Gender and power in organizations. In B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Hearn, & C. Toft (Eds.), Violence and gender relations: Theories and interventions (pp. 72–81). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istar, A. (1996). Couple assessment: Identifying and intervening in domestic violence in lesbian relationships. In C. Renzetti & C. H. Miley (Eds.), Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships (pp. 93–106). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Goodman L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L, Puryear Ketia, G., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108–138). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, G., & Gentlewarrier, S. (1991). Intimate violence in lesbian relationships: Discussion of survey findings and practice implications. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(1/2), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, K. (Ed.). (1986). Naming the violence: Speaking out about lesbian battering. Seattle, WA: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, L. L., White, B. W., Causby, V., & Isaac, A. (1994). Letting out the secret: Violence in lesbian relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 469–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loulan, J. (1987). Lesbian passion. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marecek, J. (1999). Trauma talk in feminist clinical practice. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 158–182). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marecek, J., Fine, M., & Kidder, L. (1997). Working between worlds: Qualitative methods and social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 53(4), 631–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrujo, B., & Kreger, M. (1996). Definition of roles in abusive lesbian relationships. In C. Renzetti & C. H. Miley (Eds.), Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships (pp. 23–33). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, G. (1996). Ruling the exceptions: Same–sex battering and domestic violence theory. In C. Renzetti & C. H. Miley (Eds.), Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships (pp. 9–22). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montell, F. (1999). Focus group interviews: A new feminist method. National Women's Studies Association Journal, 11(1), 44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52(5), 517–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues and methods (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M. (1992). Violent betrayal: Partner abuse in lesbian relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M. (1995). Studying partner abuse in lesbian relationships: A case for the feminist participatory research model. In C. Tully (Ed.), Lesbian social services: Research issues (pp. 29–42). New York: The Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M. (1998). Violence and abuse in lesbian relationships: Theoretical and empirical issues. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 117–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M., & Miley, C. H. (Eds.). (1996). Violence in gay and lesbian domestic partnerships. New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristock, J. L. (1991). Beyond ideologies: Understanding violence in lesbian relationships. Canadian Woman Studies, 12(1), 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristock, J. L. (1994). 'And Justice for All?' The social context of legal responses to abuse in lesbian relationships. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 7, 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristock, J. L. (1997). The cultural politics of abuse in lesbian relationships: Challenges for community action. In N. V. Benokraitis (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 279–296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristock, J. L. (1998). Community–based research: Lesbian abuse and other telling tales. In J. L. Ristock & C. G. Taylor (Eds.), Inside the academy and out: Lesbian/gay/queer studies and social action (pp. 137–154). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristock, J. L., & Pennell, J. (1996). Community research as empowerment: Feminist links, postmodern interruptions. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherzer, T. (1998). Domestic violence in lesbian relationships: Findings of the lesbian relationships research project. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 2(1), 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahly, G. B., & Lie, G. Y. (1995). Women and violence: A comparison of lesbian and heterosexual battering relationships. In J. C. Chrisler & A. H. Hemstreet (Eds.), Variations on a theme: Diversity and the psychology of women (pp. 51–78). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, M. A. (1990). The conflict tactics scale and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Strauss & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, M. A., Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussher, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Body talk: The material and discursive regulation of sexuality, madness and reproduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldner–Haugrud, L. K., Vaden Gratch, L., & Magruder, B. (1997). Victimization and perpetration rates of violence in gay and lesbian relationships: Gender issues explored. Violence and Victims, 12(2), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The Battered Woman. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L. J., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. The Journal of Sex Research, 26(1), 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S. (1999). Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (Eds.). (1995). Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power and violence. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, B. (1990). Lesbian battering: Considerations for intervention. In P. Elliot (Ed.), Confronting lesbian battering: A manual for the battered women's movement (pp. 64–67). St. Paul: Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Perkins, D. D. (Eds.). (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application [Special issue]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janice L. Ristock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ristock, J.L. Exploring Dynamics of Abusive Lesbian Relationships: Preliminary Analysis of a Multisite, Qualitative Study. Am J Community Psychol 31, 329–341 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023971006882

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023971006882

Navigation