Skip to main content
Log in

Space Mapping: Models, Sensitivities, and Trust-Regions Methods

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to organize some of the mathematical and algorithmic aspects of the space-mapping technique for continuous optimization with expensive function evaluations. First, we consider the mapping from the fine space to the coarse space when the models are vector-valued functions and when the space-mapping (nonlinear) least-squares residual is nonzero. We show how the sensitivities of the space mapping can be used to deal with space-mapping surrogates of the fine model. We derive a framework where it is possible to design globally convergent trust-region methods to minimize such fine-model surrogates.

We consider also a different perspective of space mapping and apply it, for sake of simplicity, to the situation where the models are scalar functions. The space mapping is defined in a way where it is reasonable to assume that it is point-to-point. We prove that the surrogate model built by composition of the space mapping and the coarse model is a regular function. We also discuss trust-region methods in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • N. M. Alexandrov, J. E. Dennis, R. M. Lewis, and V. Torczon, “A trust region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization,” Structural Optimization, vol. 15, pp. 16–23, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Bakr, J. W. Bandler, R. M. Biernacki, S. H. Chen, and K. Madsen, “A trust region agressive space mapping algorithm for EM optimization,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 46, pp. 2412–2425, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Bakr, J. W. Bandler, K. Madsen, and J. Søndergaard, “Review of the space mapping approach to engineering optimization and modeling,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 241–276, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Bakr, J. W. Bandler, K. Madsen, and J. Søndergaard, “An introduction to the space mapping technique,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 369–384, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Bandler, R. M. Biernacki, S. H. Chen, P. A. Grobelny, and R. H. Hemmers, “Space mapping technique for electromagnetic optimization,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 42, pp. 2536–2544, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Bandler, R. M. Biernacki, S. H. Chen, R. H. Hemmers, and K. Madsen, “Electromagnetic optimization exploiting agressive space mapping,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 43, pp. 2874–2882, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Carter, “On the global convergence of trust region algorithms using inexact gradient information,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 28, pp. 251–265, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Conn, N. I. M. Gould, and P. L. Toint, “Trust-region methods,” MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Dennis, “Surrogate modelling and space mapping for engineering optimization,” A summary of the Danish Technical University November 2000 Workshop, Technical Report TR00–35, Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University, 2000.

  • J. E. Dennis, S.-B. B. Li, and R. A. Tapia, A unified approach to global convergence of trust region methods for nonsmooth optimization,” Math. Programming, vol. 68, pp. 319–346, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Leary, A. Bhaskar, and A. Keane, “A constraint mapping approach to the structural optimization of an expensive model using surrogates,” in Surrogate Modelling and Space Mapping for Engineering Optimization, H. B. Nielsen (Ed.), DK-2800, Lyngby–Denmark, 2000, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Moré, “Recent developments in algorithms and software for trust regions methods,” in Mathematical Programming. The State of Art, A. Bachem, M. Grotschel, and B. Korte (Eds.), Springer Verlag: New York, 1983, pp. 258–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. B. Nielsen (Ed.), “Surrogate modelling and space mapping for engineering optimization,” DK-2800, Lyngby–Denmark, 2000, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. D. Powell, “Convergence properties of a class of minimization algorithms,” in Nonlinear Programming 2, O. L. Mangasarian, R. R. Meyer, and S. M. Robinson (Eds.), Academic Press: New York, 1975, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Søndergaard, “Non-linear optimization using space mapping,” Master's Thesis, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vicente, L.N. Space Mapping: Models, Sensitivities, and Trust-Regions Methods. Optimization and Engineering 4, 159–175 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023968629245

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023968629245

Navigation