Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Interaction in the Dutch Market for Consumer Magazines

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information goods such as newspapers and magazines have a number of distinct economic characteristics such as a ‘high fixed cost – low marginal (variable) cost’ structure and the possibility to subsidize content through selling advertising space. We develop a simple one-shot duopoly model that analyses strategic interaction in a market with such features. We focus on the firms’ best responses and test the theoretical predictions of the model empirically by panel regression techniques using a balanced panel data set of 60 Dutch consumer magazines over the period 1991–1998. Our 3SLS estimation results confirm the prediction of our model that the Dutch market for consumer magazines is characterized by strategic complementarity between magazine and ad prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abbring, J.H. and J.C. van Ours 1994, ‘Selling News and Advertising Space; Economics of Dutch Newspapers,’ De Economist, 142, pp. 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsem, K.J., M.A. Boorsma, G.J. van Helden, J.C. Hoekstra, P.S.H. Leeflang, and H.H.M. Visser 1982, ‘De aanbodstructuur van de periodiek verschijnende pers in Nederland,’ WRR Voorstudie, M9, The Hague, Staatsuitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsem, K.J. and P.S.H. Leeflang 1996, ‘De prijsgevoeligheid van dagbladen: een vraaganalyse,'Maandschrift voor Accountancy en Bedrijfshuishoudkunde, (March) 1996, pp. 104-110.

  • Baltagi, B.H. 1995, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, New York, Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belch, G. and M. Belch 1995, Introduction to Advertising and Promotion, New York, Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, R., R. Caves, and A. Lo 1989, ‘Games of Survival in the US Newspaper Industry,’ Applied Economics, 21, pp. 631–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J., J. Geanakoplos, and P. Klemperer 1985, ‘Multi market Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements,’ Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp. 488-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W.M. 1953, ‘The Maximisation of Profit by a Newspaper,’ Review of Economic Studies, 20, pp. 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, J.N. and W.B. Trautman 1990, ‘Economic Effects of Media Concentration: Estimates from a Model of the Newspaper Firm,’ Journal of Industrial Economics, 39, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J.M. 1983, ‘Daily Newspaper Advertising Rates, Local Media Cross-Ownership, Newspaper Chains, and Media Competition,’ Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 635–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole 1984,’ The Fat Cat Effect, the Puppy Dog Ploy and the Lean and Hungry Look', American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 74, pp. 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, J. 1994, Medienökonomie, Band 1: Mediensysteme, Zeitung, Zeitschrift, Anzeigenblatt, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.

  • Hemels, J.H.M.J. 1998, ‘Tijdschriften,’ in: Gids voor de Informatiesector 1997/1998, Amsterdam, NLBC Boekblad B.V., pp. 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. 1986, Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalitta, J.K. and R.H. Ducoffe 1995, ‘A Simultaneous-Equation Analysis of Pricing, Circulation and Advertising Revenue for Leading Consumer Magazines,’ Journal of Media Economics, 8, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranenburg, H.L. van and G.A. Pfann 2002, ‘Government Policy and the Evolution of the Market for Dutch Daily Newspapers,’ De Economist, 150 3, pp. 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S. and T.F. Simon 1993, The Economics and Regulation of United States Newspapers, Norwood, NJ, Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. and J. Weigand 2003, ‘The Price-Concentration Relationship in Interlinked Market. Evidence from German Magazine Publishing,’ Schmalenbachs Business Review forthcoming.

  • Reimer, E. 1992, ‘The Effect of Monopolization on Newspaper Advertising Rates,’ American Economist, 36, pp. 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosse, J.N. 1970, ‘Estimating Cost Function Parameters without Using Cost Data: Illustrated Methodology,’ Econometrica, 38, pp. 256–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP 1998, Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 1998, The Hague, SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. Year, ‘A Theory of Oligopoly,’ Journal of Political Economy, 72, pp. 44-61.

  • Tirole, J. 1988, The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. 2000, Oligopoly Pricing, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L.G. ed. 1989, Concentration and Price, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakfoort, J., Weigand, J. Strategic Interaction in the Dutch Market for Consumer Magazines. De Economist 151, 205–224 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023965603048

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023965603048

Navigation