Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diatom and thecamoebian signatures of Red River (Manitoba and North Dakota) floods: Data collected from the 1997 and 1999 spring freshets

  • Published:
Journal of Paleolimnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Overbank deposits that aggraded during the severe and moderate Red River, Manitoba and North Dakota floods of 1997 and 1999 were examined to characterize the typical diatom and thecamoebian flood assemblages. The deposits contain diatom assemblages dominated by Nitzschia spp., Stephanodiscus spp. and Navicula spp. as well as large quantities of Hantzschia amphioxys, Luticola imbricata and L. mutica and lesser amounts of Aulacoseira italica, A. granulata, A. ambigua, Cyclotella meneghiniana, Amphora montana and Synedra ulna. Samples collected from the Red River in late summer are dominated by the plankton Cyclotella atomus, species of Stephanodiscus, Cyclostephanos sp. 1 (cf. delicatus), Cyclotella meneghiniana, Nitzschia reversa and Nitzschia acicularis. Late summer, floodplain lake plankton are dominated by Fragilaria capucina, Cocconeis placentula, Stephanodiscus parvus/minutulus and Cyclotella atomus. Red River thecamoebian flood assemblages are dominated by Cyclopyxis spp., with lesser amounts of Centropyxis aculeata and Arcella vulgaris. Late summer water samples from the Red River contain very few thecamoebian remains. The majority of the taxa present are Centropyxis aculeata, Arcella vulgaris and Cyclopyxis spp. Floodplain lakes are dominated by benthic thecamoebians, especially Difflugia oblonga and Cucurbitella tricuspis, a eutrophic indicator. The results of this baseline study suggest that diatom and thecamoebian assemblages can characterize flood deposits, within floodplain lake basins, during both very high and moderately high flood years, and that these assemblages are inherently different from those typically found in lakes along the Red River.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker V.R., Webb R.H. and House P.K. 2002. The scientific and societal value of paleoflood hydrology. In: House P.K., Webb R.H., Baker V.R. and Levish D.R. (eds), Ancient Floods, Modern Hazards: Principles and Applications of Paleoflood Hydrology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandy O.L. 1954. Distribution of some shallow water foraminifera in the Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 254-F: pp. 125-141.

  • Battarbee R.W. 1986. Diatom analysis. In: Berglund B.E. (ed.), Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, pp. 527-570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks G.R., Medioli B.E., Hunter J., Nixon M. and Good R.L. 2001. Lithological and geophysical logs of shallow boreholes across the floodplain of the Red River, near St. Jean Baptiste, Manitoba. Geol. Surv. Can. Open File 3042, 20 pp.

  • Brooks G.R. and Nielsen E. 2000. Red River,Red River Valley, Manitoba. Can. Geog. 44: 304-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge S.M. and Schröder-Adams C.J. 1998. Thecamoebians in Lake Winnipeg: a tool for Holocene paleolimnology. J. Paleolim. 19: 309-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton L., Moran S.R., Bluemle J.P. and Carlson C.G. 1980. Geological Map of North Dakota. U.S. Geol. Surv. Map 500 1: 500 000.

  • Deflandre G. 1953. Ordres des Testaceolobosa (De Saedeleer, 1934), Testaceofilosa (De Saedeleer, 1934), Thalamina (Haeckel, 1862) ou Thécamoebiens (Auct.) (Rhizopoda Testacea). In: Grassé P.-P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie Vol. 1(2). Masson, Paris, pp. 97-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit S.S., Smol J.P, Kingston J.C. and Charles D.F. 1992. Diatoms: powerful indicators of environmental change. Envir. Sci. Techn. 26: 22-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle D.L. and Melack J.M. 1993. Consequences of riverine flooding for seston and the periphyton of floating meadows in an Amazon floodplain lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 38: 1500-1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foissner W. 1994. High numbers of testate amoebae (Protozoa) in the benthon of clean, acidified mountain streams. Limnology 24: 323-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain H. 1981. Flore des Diatomées. Diatomophycées: eaux douces et saumâtres du Massif armoricain et des contrées voisines d' Europe occidentale. Société nouvelle des éditions Boubée, Paris, 444 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavic H., Day T.J. and Yuzyk T.R. 1988. Interpretation of suspended sediment characteristics, Red River at Emerson Manitoba, 1978-1986. Environ. Can. (Sediment Survey Section) report IWD-HQ-WRB-SS-88-3. pp. 1-66.

  • Green J. 1963. Zooplankton of the River Sokoto, the Rhizopoda Testacea. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 141: 497-514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J. 1975. Freshwater ecology in the Mato Grasso, Central Brazil, IV: Associations of the testate Rhizopoda. J. Nat. Hist., Lond. 9: 545-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay M.B., Smol J.P, Pipke K.J. and Lesack L.F.W. 1997. A diatom-based paleohydrological model for the Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arct. Alp. Res. 29: 430-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay M.B., Michelutti N. and Smol J.P. 2001. Ecological patterns of diatom assemblages from Mackenzie Delta lakes, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can. J. Bot. 78: 19-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel A. 1898. A list of the Protozoa and Rotifera found in the Illinois River and adjacent lakes at Havana, III. Illinois State Lab. Nat. Hist. Bull. 5: 301-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox J.C. 1993. Large increases in flood magnitude in response to modest changes in climate. Nature 361: 430-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofoid C.A. 1903. The plankton of the Illinois River, 1894-1899. Part 1. Quantitative investigations and general results. Bull. Illinois State Lab. 6: 95-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofoid C.A. 1908. The plankton of the Illinois River, 1894-1899. Part II. Constituent organisms and their seasonal distribution. Bull. Illinois State Lab. 8: 1-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer K. and Lange-Bertalot H. 1986-1991. Bacillariophyceae. In: Ettl H., Gerloff J., Heynig H. and Mollenhaur D. (eds), Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, bands 2/1 to 2/4. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 876 (band 2/1), pp. 596 (band 2/2), pp. 576 (band 2/3), pp. 437 (band 2/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lousier J.D. and Parkinson D. 1981. The disappearance of the empty tests of litter-and soil-testate amoebae (Testacea, Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Arch. Protistenk. 124: 312-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medioli B.E. 2001. Geochemical, grain size, mineralogical and chronological data from three shallow cores in the Red River Valley (Horseshoe Lake, Lake Louise, Manitoba and Salt Lake, North Dakota). Geol. Surv. Can. Open File 4025, 80 pp.

  • Medioli F.S. and Scott D.B. 1983. Holocene Arcellacea (Thecamoebians) from Eastern Canada. Cushman Found. Foram. Res. Spec. Publ. 21, 63 pp.

  • Medioli F.S. and Scott D.B. 1988. Lacustrine thecamoebians (mainly Arcellaceans) as potential tools for palaeolimnological interpretations. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 62: 361-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelutti N., Hay M.B., Marsh P., Lesack L. and Smol J.P. 2001. Diatom changes in lake sediments from the Mackenzie Delta, N. W. T., Canada: Paleohydrological Applications. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 33:1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey G.B. and Meints J. 2000. Geological Map of Minnesota Bedrock Geology. In: Minn. Geol. Surv. Map S-20, scale 1: 1 000 000. 3rd ed.

  • Murray J.W. 1973. Distribution and Ecology of Living Benthic Foraminiferids. Heineman, London, 274 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor J.E., Ely L.L., Wohl E.E., Stevens L.E., Melis T.S., Kale V.S. et al. 1994. A 4500-year record of large floods on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. J. Geol. 102: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden C.G. and Hedley R.H. 1980. An Atlas of Freshwater Testate Amoebae. British Museum (Natural History). London and Oxford University Press, Oxford, 222 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson C.G. and Stevenson R.J. 1989. Seasonality in river phytoplankton: multivariate analyses of data from the Ohio River and six Kentucky tributaries. Hydrobiologia 182: 99-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair G.I. 1914. Contributions to a knowledge of the biology of the Richmond River. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 39: 93-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Red River Basin Investigation 1951. Red River hydrographic survey: channel distance mi 0 to 154. Dept. Resources and Development Canada, scale 1: 9000.

  • Robinson C. and Rushforth S.R. 1987. Effects of physical disturbance and canopy cover on attached diatom community structure in an Idaho stream. Hydrobiologia 154: 49-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round F.E., Crawford R.M. and Mann D.G. 1990. The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of The Genera. Cambridge University Press, New York, 747 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabri A.W. 1988.Seasonal variation of testaceous amoebae (Sarcodina, Protozoa) population in the river Tigris. Arab Gulf J. Sci. Res., Part B: Agri. Biol. Sci. 6: 439-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader H.J. and Gersonde R. 1978. Diatoms and silicoflagellates. Utrecht Micropaleon. Bull. 17: 129-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D.B. and Medioli F.S. 1980. Post-glacial emergence curves in the Maritimes determined from marine sediments in raised basins. In Proc. Coastlines '80 NSERC Pub., pp. 428-446.

  • Scott D.B., Medioli F.S. and Schafer C.S. 2001. Monitoring Coastal Environments using Foraminifera and Thecamoebian Indicators. Cambridge University Press, New York, 208 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoermer E.F. and Smol J.P. 1999a. Applications and uses of diatoms: prologue. In: Stoermer E.F. and Smol J.P. (eds), The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoermer E.F. and Smol J.P. 1999b. Epilogue: a view to the future. In: Stoermer E.F. and Smol J.P. (eds), The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 447-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller J.T. and Clayton L. 1983. Glacial Lake Agassiz. Geol. Assoc. Can. Spec. Paper 26, 451 pp.

  • Thompson T.L. 1983.Late Cretaceous marine foraminifera from Pleistocene fluviolacustrine deposits in Eastern Missouri. J. Paleon. 57: 1304-1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torigai K., Schröder-Adams C.J. and Burbidge S.M. 2000. A variable lacustrine environment in Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba: evidence from modern thecamoebian distribution. J. Paleolim. 23: 305-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey 1985a. Cavalier North Dakota-Minnesota, Map 48097-E1-TM-100, scale 1: 100 000.

  • United States Geological Survey 1985b. Grafton North Dakota-Minnesota, Map 48-97-A1-TM-100, scale 1: 100 000.

  • United States Geological Survey 1985c. Grand Forks North Dakota-Minnesota, Map 47097-E1-TM-100, scale 1: 100 000.

  • Van Den Brink F.W.B., Van Katwijk M.M. and Van Der Velde G. 1994. Impact of hydrology on phyto-and zooplankton community composition in floodplain lakes along the Lower Rhine and Meuse. J. Plankton Res. 16: 351-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Brink F.W B., De Leeuw J.P.H.M., Van DerVelde G. and Verheggen G.M. 1993. Impact of hydrology on the chemistry and phytoplankton development in floodplain lakes along the Lower Rhine and Meuse. Biogeochemistry 19: 103-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velho L.F.M., Lansac-Tôha F.A. and Serafim-Junior M. 1996. Testate amoebae (Rhizopoda-Sarcodina) from zooplankton of the High Paraná River floodplain, state of Mato Grasso Do Sol, Brazil: I. Families Arcellidae and Centropyxidae; Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Envir. 31: 35-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velho L.F.M. and Lansac-Tôha F.A. 1996. Testate amoebae (Rhizopoda-Sarcodina) from zooplankton of the High Paraná River floodplain, state of Mato Grasso Do Sol, Brazil: II. Family Difflugidae. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Envir. 31: 179-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velho L.F.M., Lansac-Tôha F.A. and Bini L.M. 1999. Spatial and temporal variations in densities of testate amoebae in the plankton of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 411:103-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton W.R. 1952. Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera. Contrib. Cushman Found. Foram. Res. 3: 56-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel R.G. 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York, 1006 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S.E., Cummings B.F. and Smol J.P. 1996. Assessing the reliability of salinity inference models from diatom assemblages: an examination of a 219-lake data set from western North America. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 53: 1580-1594.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Terrain Sciences Division, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, K1A 0E8, Canada

    Barbara E. Medioli & Gregory R. Brooks

Authors
  1. Barbara E. Medioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory R. Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medioli, B.E., Brooks, G.R. Diatom and thecamoebian signatures of Red River (Manitoba and North Dakota) floods: Data collected from the 1997 and 1999 spring freshets. Journal of Paleolimnology 29, 353–386 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023965403770

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023965403770

Search

Navigation