To identify personality traits associated with sexual harassment proclivities, scales that measure the Likelihood to Sexually Harass (LSH) and personality traits were administered to 150 respondents. Peer reports of personality were also obtained from respondents' acquaintances. The Big Five factors and a newly suggested major dimension of personality, named Honesty–Humility, were measured to represent respondents' personalities. Two major findings were obtained. First, as predicted, Honesty–Humility was more strongly associated with sexual harassment proclivities than were any of the Big Five, within both self- and peer reports. Second, among the Big Five, only peer-reported Intellect/Imagination (i.e., Openness to Experience) contributed to the prediction of LSH independently of Honesty–Humility. The importance of using an optimal framework of personality structure was discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2002). Six independent factors of personality description: A response to Saucier. European Journal of Personality, 16, 63-75.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (in press). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality of Social Psychology.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Son, C. (2000). Honesty as the sixth factor of personality: Correlations with machiavellianism, psychopathy, and social adroitness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 359-368.
Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Cutler, B. D. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A re-examination of gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 124, 409-416.
Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). The attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
Barling, J., Dekker, I., Loughlin, C. A., Kelloway, E. K., Fullager, C., & Johnson, D. (1996). Prediction and replication of the organizational and personal consequences of work-place sexual harassment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 4-25.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360.
Berkowitz, N. H., & Wolkon, G. H. (1964). A forced choice form of F scale-Free of acquiescent response set. Sociometry, 27, 54-65.
Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory Revised (NEO-PI-R) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dall'Ara, E., & Maass, A. (1999). Studying sexual harassment in the laboratory: Are egalitarian women at high risk? Sex Roles, 41, 681-704.
Driscoll, D. M., Kelly, J. R., & Henderson, W. M. (1998). Can perceivers identify likelihood to sexually harass? Sex Roles, 38, 557-588.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1999). Enforcement guidance: Vicarious employer liability for unlawful harassment by supervisors. Code of Federal Regulations. 615 (Sec. 915.002).
Equal Opportunity Commission of Australia. (2000). Commissioners annual report, 1999-2000. Canberra: Author.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heaven, P. C. L., & Bucci, S. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality, 15, 49-56.
Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory Revised manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The "Big Five" Inventory-Version 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Larrimer-Scherbaum, K., & Popovich, P. (2001, April). The relationship between personality and the proclivity to sexually harass. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2002). The HEXACO Personality Inventory: A new measure of the major dimensions of personality. Unpublished manuscript.
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Shin, K.-H. (in press). Personality correlates of workplace anti-social behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review.
Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, K. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 151-158.
Malamuth, N. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962.
Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 148-157.
Murphy, J. D., Driscoll, D. M., & Kelly, J. R. (1999). Differences in the nonverbal behavior of men who vary in the likelihood to sexually harass. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 113-128.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Peabody, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 59-71.
Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552-567.
Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Schmidtke, J. M. (1998). Individual differences in the effectiveness of sexual harassment awareness training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 698-723.
Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17, 269-290.
Pryor, J. B. (1995). The psychosocial impact of sexual harassment on women in the U.S. military. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 581-603.
Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69-84.
Pryor, J. B., LaVite, C., & Stoller, L. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42. 68-83.
Pryor, J. B., & Meyers, A. B. (2000). Men who sexually harass women. In L. B. Schlesinger (Ed.), Serial offenders: Current thought, recent findings, unusual syndromes (pp. 207-228). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Pryor, J. B., & Stoller, L. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men who are high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163-169.
Terpstra, D. E., & Cook, S. E. (1985). Complaint characteristics and reported behaviors and consequences associated with formal sexual harassment charges. Personnel Psychology, 38, 559-574.
Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (2000). The impact of organizational culture on perceptions and experiences of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 188-205.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, K., Gizzarone, M. & Ashton, M.C. Personality and the Likelihood to Sexually Harass. Sex Roles 49, 59–69 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023961603479
- Big Five
- sexual harassment
- LSH scale