Abstract
This article examines the process by which remotely sensed land cover maps work to both simplify and complicate landscapes. The central argument is not merely that the construction of land cover maps is complex, but that the points of complexity often arise through the process of trying to simplify. In other words, the forces of complexity are intimately connected to the forces of simplicity and vice versa. This article takes as a case study the production of WISCLAND, (Wisconsin Initiative for Statewide Cooperation on Landscape Analysis and Data), a statewide land cover map of Wisconsin derived from remote sensing data and GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technologies and proceeds by analysis of mapping methodology, practice, and representation. In addition to the development of a more nuanced critique of the use of land cover maps, it facilitates the possibility for a constructive dialogue between remote sensing practitioners and the critical GIS community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964.
Bowker, G. C. (2000). Mapping biodiversity. International JoamaL of Geographicaal Infomzation Science 14(8): 739-754.
Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cloud, J. (2001). Imaging the world in a barrell: CORONA and the clandestine convergence of earth sciences. Social Studies of Science 31(2): 231-251.
Crampton, J. W. (2001). Maps as social constructions: Power, communication and visualization. Progrss in Human Geography 25(2): 235-252.
DNR (1998). WISCLAND Land Cover Data Lineage.
DNR (1999). Land Cover of Wisconsin: User's Guide to WISCLAND Land Cover Data.
Forman, R. T. T., and Godron, M. (1986). Landfcape Ecology, Wiley, New York.
Gurda, R. F. (1994). Linking and building institutions for a statewide land cover mapping program. In GIS/LIS 1994 Proceedings, Phoenix, AZ.
Hansen, A. J., and di Castri, F. (eds.) (1992). Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge, New York.
Harley, J. B. (1989a). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26(2): 1-20.
Harley, J. B. (1989b). Maps, knowledge, and power. In Cosgrove, D., and Daniels, S. (eds.), The Iconography of Landscape, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Harvey, F., and Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A 30: 1683-1694.
Jensen, J. R. (1996). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Johnston, C. A., Pastor, J., and Pinay, G. (1992). Quantitative methods for studying landscape boundaries. In Hansen, A. J., and di Castri, F. (eds.), Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 107-125.
Landres, P. B., Knight, R. L., Pickett, S. T. A., and Cadenasso, M. L. (1998). Ecological effects of administrative boundaries. In Knight, R. L., and Landres, P. B. (eds.), Stewardship Across Boundaries, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M., and Woolgar, S. (eds.), Representation in Scientific Practive, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lillesand, T. M. (1993). Suggested strategies for satellite-assisted statewide land cover mapping in Wisconsin. In Lewis, A. J. (ed.), ASPRS Technical Papers Remote Sensing: Looking to the Future With an Eye on the Past, pp. 193-205.
Lillesand, T. M. (1994). Strategies for improving the accuracy and specificity of large-area, satellite-based land cover inventories. In Proceedings of the Symposium: Mapping and GIS 30: 23-30.
Lillesand, T. M., Chipman, J., Nagel, D., Reese, H., Bobo, M., and Goldman, R. (1998). Upper Midwest Gap Analysis Program Image Processing Protocol. Onalaska, WI.
Mack, P. E. (1990). Viewing the Earth: The Social Construction of the Landsat Satellite System, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
O'Neill, R. V., and Hunsaker, C. T. (1997). Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale. Bioscience 47(8): 513-519.
Pickles, J. (1991). Geography, G.I.S., and the surveillant society. In Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conference, pp. 80-91.
Pijanowski, B. (1999). The Land Transformation Model. Retrieved February 2001, from http://www.ltm.msu.edu
Risser, P. G. (1999). Landscape ecology: Does the science only need to change at the margin? In Klapatek, J. M., and Gardner, R. H. (eds.), Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 3-10.
Schonewald-Cox, C. M., and Bayless, J. W. (1986). The boundary model: A geographic analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 38: 305-322.
Schuurman, N. (1999). Critical GIS: Theorizing an emerging science. Cartographica 36(4): 1-108.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Iike a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Scott, J. M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Buterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S., D'Erchia, F., Edwards, T. C. Jr., Uliliman, J., and Wright, R. G. (1993). Gap Analysis: A Geographic Approach to Protection of Biological Diversity.
Star, S. L. (ed.) (1995). The politics of formal representations: Wizards, Gurus, and organizational complexity. In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp. 88-118.
Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387-420.
Turnbull, D. (1993). Maps Are Territories: Science Is an Atlas, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Wiens, J. A. (1992). Ecological flows across landscape boundaries: A conceptual overview. In Hansen, A. J., and di Castri, F. (eds.), Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecologicaal Flows, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 217-235.
Wood, D. (1992). The Power of Maps, Guilford Press, New York.
Wood, D., and Fels, J. (1986). Designs on signs/myth and meaning in maps. Cartographica 23(3): 54-103.
Zubrow, A. A. S. (2001). Mapping Science: Remote Sensing, Regional Land Cover Maps, and the Production of Scientific Knowledge, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zubrow, A.A.S. Mapping Tension: Remote Sensing and the Production of a Statewide Land Cover Map. Human Ecology 31, 281–307 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023936930795
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023936930795