Abstract
Differences between corporate taxation of EU member states drive a wedge between after-tax and pre-tax productivity. This implies that productivity could be increased by reallocating capital from low-tax to high-tax member states. Moreover, the integration of the EU capital market may trigger tax competition among member states. The responsiveness of investors to taxation is crucial for the importance of both the misallocation of capital and the extent of tax competition. In this paper we measure this responsiveness by examining the relation between FDI positions and effective corporate income tax rates. Our estimates show that investors from one EU member state increase their FDI position in another EU member state by approximately four percent if the latter decreases its effective corporate income tax rate by one percentage point relative to the European mean.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adler, M. and B. Dumas 1983, ‘International Portfolio Choice and Corporation Finance: A Synthesis,’ Journal of Finance, 38, pp. 925-984.
Altshuler, R., H. Grubert, and T. Scott Newlon 1998, ‘Has U.S. Investment Abroad Become More Sensitive to Tax Rates?,’ NBER Working Paper, 6383.
Bénassy-Quéré, A., L. Fontagné, and A. Lahrèche-Révil 2000, ‘Foreign Direct Investment and the Prospects for Tax Coordination in Europe,’ CEPII Working Paper, 2000-06.
Bond, S., L. Chennels, M.P. Devereux, M. Gammie, and E. Troup 2000, Corporate Tax Harmonisation in Europe: A Guide to the Debate, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Chennells, L. and R. Griffith 1997, Taxing Profits in a Changing World, London, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Clegg, J. and S. Scott-Green 1999, ‘The Determinants of New FDI Capital Flows into the EC: A Statistical Comparison of the USA and Japan,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, pp. 597-616.
Commission of the European Communities 2001, ‘Company Taxation in the Internal Market,’ Commission Staff Working Paper, COM2001582.
Devereux, M.P. and H. Freeman 1995, ‘The Impact of Tax on FDI: Empirical Evidence and the Implication for Tax Integration Schemes,’ International Tax and Public Finance, 2, pp. 85-106.
Devereux, M.P. and R. Griffith 1998, 'The Taxation of Discrete Investment Choices, IFS Working Paper.
Devereux, M.P., R. Griffith, and A. Klemm 2001, ‘Have Taxes on Mobile Capital Declined?’ IFS Working Paper.
Feldstein, M.S. and C. Horioka 1980, ‘Domestic Savings and International Capital Flows,’ Economic Journal, 90, pp. 314-329.
Hines, J.R. 1996, ‘Altered States: Taxes and the Location of FDI in America,’ American Economic Review, 86, 1076-1094.
Hines, J.R. 1999, ‘Lessons from Behavioral Responses to International Taxation,’ National Tax Journal, 52, pp. 305-322.
Hines, J.R. and E.M. Rice 1994, ‘Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, pp. 149-182.
IBFD 1999, European Tax Handbook, Amsterdam, IBFD Publications.
Mishkin, F. 1984, ‘Are Real Interest Rates Equal Across Countries? An Empirical Investigation of International Parity Conditions,’ Journal of Finance, 39, pp. 327-342.
Mooij, R de. and S. Ederveen 2002, ‘Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research,’ International Tax and Public Finance forthcoming.
OECD Countries Statistics Directorate 1998, National Accounts: Main Aggregates 1 1960-1996, Paris: OECD.
Sachs, J. 1997, in: (A.W. Gray ed.). International Perspectives on the Irish Economy, Dublin, Indecon Economic Consultants.
Slemrod, J. 1990, ‘Tax Effects on FDI in the United States: Evidence from a Cross-Country Comparison,’ in: (A. Razin and J. Slemrod eds.), Taxation in the Global Economy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, J.D. 1999, ‘Theories of Tax Competition,’ National Tax Journal, 522, pp. 269-304.
Yamada, T. and T. Yamada 1996, ‘Integration and Japanese FDI in the EC,’ Contemporary Economic Policy, 14, pp. 47-57.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorter, J., Parikh, A. How Sensitive is FDI to Differences in Corporate Income Taxation within the EU?. De Economist 151, 193–204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023913618978
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023913618978