Skip to main content
Log in

A Nested Benders Decomposition Approach to Locating Distributed Generation in a Multiarea Power System

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A nested Generalized Benders decomposition scheme is used to solve a mixed-integer stochastic programming model. The model evaluates central station and distributed power generation, storage, and demand management assets on a linearized electric power transmission network. It considers temporal and spatial variations in the marginal cost of power, which are captured in the Benders cuts in the solution scheme. These variations are caused not only by differences in generating unit operating expenses and capacity expansion costs, but also by physical transmission constraints that can alter minimum cost dispatch and siting of these units. The transmission constraints addressed include limits on MW power flows and both of Kirchhoff's laws via a linearized DC load flow representation. The model consists of three modules: a stochastic linear production costing model for operating central system generation, a nonlinear program for planning central system generation and transmission, and a mixed-integer program for evaluation of local area distributed resources. Generalized Benders decomposition is applied twice to coordinate these modules. The production costing model is a subproblem to the central system planning model, which is in turn a subproblem to the distributed resource model. The coordination scheme is described in detail, including the calculation of marginal costs. An application shows the effects of marginal cost variations on capacity expansion decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benders, J.F. (1962). “Partitioning Procedures for Solving Mixed-Variables Programming Problems.” Numerische Mathematik 4, 238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton, R. and R.N. Allan. (1996). Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems. 2nd Ed. Plenum.

  • Billinton, R., R.J. Ringlee, and A.J. Wood. (1973). Power System Reliability Calculations. MIT Press.

  • Bloom, J.A. (1983). “Solving An Electrical Generation Capacity Expansion Planning Problem by Generalized Benders Decomposition.” Operations Research 31(1), 84–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J.A. (1984). “Long-Range Generation Planning Using Generalized Benders' Decomposition: Implementation and Experience.” Operations Research 32(2), 190–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, C.D., R. Orans, and S.W. Chapel. (1997). “The Distributed Utility: A New Electric Utility Planning and Pricing Paradigm.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 22, 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M. (1972). “Generalized Benders Decomposition.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 10(4), 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorenstin, B.G., N.M. Campodonico, J.P. Costa, and M.V.F. Pereira. (1993). “Power System Expansion Planning Under Uncertainty.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 8(1), 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B.F. (1995). “Models for Integrated Resource Planning by Electric Utilities.” European Journal of Operational Research 83(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B.F. and Y. Ji. (1999). “Stochastic Programming-Based Bounding of Expected Production Costs for Multiarea Electric Power Systems.” Operations Research 47(6), 836–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W.W. (1992). “Contract Networks for Electric-Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4(6), 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, T.E. and M. Cheney. (2000). “The Potential Market for Photovoltaics and Other Distributed Resources in Rural Electric Cooperatives.” Energy Journal 21(3), 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, T.E., H.J. Wenger, and K.K. Farmer. (1996). “Distributed Generation: An Alternative to Electric Utility Investments in System Capacity.” Energy Policy 24(2), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. and B.F. Hobbs. (1994). “Optimal SO2 Compliance Planning Using Probabilistic Production Costing and Generalized Benders Decomposition.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 9(1), 174–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, N., R. Allan, P. Crossley, D. Kirschen, and G. Strubac. (2000).” Embedded Generation. Institute of Electrical Engineers, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E.P. (1995). “Regulation By Simulation: The Role of Production Cost Models in Electricity Pricing and Planning.” Operations Research 43, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. (1990). “Multi-Area Power System Reliability and Production Costing.” EPRI EL-6912, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppitsch, M.J. and B.F. Hobbs. (1996). “The Effect of NOx Regulations on Emissions Dispatch: A Probabilistic Production Costing Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 11(4), 1711–1716.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, S.A. (1999). “A Benders Decomposition Approach to Multiarea Stochastic Distributed Utility Planning.” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, S.A., B.F. Hobbs, and Y. Ji. (2002). “Distributed Utility Planning Using Probabilistic Production Costing and Generalized Benders Decomposition.” IEEE Trans. on Power Systems 17(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. (1998). “Emerging Markets for Distributed Resources.” EPRI Journal 23(2), 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, F. and R.J. Giglio. (1977). “Planning Electric Power Generation: A Nonlinear Mixed Integer Model Employing Benders Decomposition.” Management Science 23(9), 946–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreira, M.V.F. and L.M.V.G. Pinto. (1985). “Stochastic Optimization of a Multireservoir Hydroelectric System: A Decomposition Approach.” Water Resources Research 21(6), 779–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifenberger, J.P., P.Q. Hanser, and P. Ammann. (1997). “What's in the Cards for Distributed Resources?” The Energy Journal, Special Issue on Distributed Resources 1–16.

  • Pupp, R.L. et al. (1996). “Distributed Utility Penetration Study. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) TR 106265, Research Project 3733-03, Final Report, Palo Alto, CA.

  • Pupp, R.L., R. Orans, C. Feinstein, K. Lau, and J. Grainger. (July 1993). “Distributed Utility Valuation Project Monograph. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) TR 102807, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, N.S. and Y.H. Wan. (1994). “Optimum Location of Resources in Distributed Planning.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 9(4), 2014–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F.C., M.C. Caramanis, R.D. Tabors, and R.E. Bohn. (1988). “Spot Pricing of Electricity. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, R. and D. Anderson. (1977). “Electricity Economics: Essays and Case Studies. University, Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A.J. and B.F. Wollenberg. (1996).” Power Generation, Operation and Control. 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCusker, S., Hobbs, B.F. A Nested Benders Decomposition Approach to Locating Distributed Generation in a Multiarea Power System. Networks and Spatial Economics 3, 197–223 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023912019269

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023912019269

Navigation