Abstract
We investigated the mechanisms underlying the differences in gating effects on short- and long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) relating to movement. SEPs were recorded in normal subjects for 6 different tasks in Experiment 1: Control, Movement, Distraction, Attention, Movement during Distraction and Movement during Attention, and for 4 different tasks in Experiment 2: Control, Passive Movement, Contralateral Movement and Movement Imagery. The amplitudes of short-latency SEPs were significantly reduced by active and passive movement of the stimulated hand, but long-latency SEPs (N140-P200) were significantly enhanced by active movement of the stimulated hand. Attention, Distraction, Contralateral Movement and Movement Imagery did not affect the amplitudes of SEPs. The degree of enhancement of long-latency SEPs by active Movement was greater than that by active movement with Attention or Distraction. Gating effects on long-latency SEPs were different from those on short-latency SEPs. Since this effect was not related to Attention/Distraction, Passive Movement, Movement Imagery or Movement of another site, it is probably due to specific centrifugal effects, which are different from more direct gating effects on short-latency components. This study showed the difference in gating effects on somatosensory perception depending on time periods following stimulation, which may indicate an interaction between motor and somatosensory cortex.
References
Abbruzzese, G., Ratto, S., Favale, E. and Abbruzzese, M. Proprioceptive modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during active or passive finger movements in man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry., 1981, 44: 942-949.
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Wood, C.C., Darcey, T.M., Spencer, D.D. and Williamson, P.D. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. J. Neurophysiol., 1989a, 62: 694-710.
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Wood, C.C., Williamson, P.D. and Spencer, D.D. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity. J. Neurophysiol., 1989b, 62:711-722.
Allison, T., McCarthy, G. and Wood, C.C. The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 301-314.
Bocker, K.B., Forget, R. and Brunia, C.H. The modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during the foreperiod of a forewarned reaction time task. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 88: 105-117.
Broughton, R., Regis, H. and Gastaut, H. Modifications of somaesthesic evoked potentials during bursts of mu rhythm and during fist clenching. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1965, 18: 720.
Cheron, G. and Borenstein, S. Specific gating of the early somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 67: 537-548.
Cheron, G. and Borenstein, S. Gating of the early components of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in different sensory-motor interference modalities. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 80: 522-530.
Cheron, G. and Borenstein, S. Mental movement simulation affects the N30 frontal component of the somatosensory evoked potential. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 288-292.
Cohen, L.G. and Starr, A. Vibration and muscle contraction affect somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology, 1985, 35: 691-698.
Coquery, J.M., Coulmance, M. and Leron, M.C. Modifications des potentials evoques corticaux somesthesiques Durant des mouvements actifs et passifs chez l'homme. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1972, 33: 269-276.
Desmedt, J.E. and Robertson, D. Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced-paced cognitive tasks in man. J. Physiol., 1977, 271: 761-782.
Desmedt, J.E. and Tomberg, C. Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30, P40, P100 and N140. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 321-346.
Forss, N. and Jousmaki, V. Sensorimotor integration in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices. Brain Res., 1998, 781: 259-267.
Garcia-Larrea, L., Lukaszewicz, A.C. and Mauguiere, F. Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120-to-N140 transition. Psychophysiology, 1995, 32: 526-537.
Giblin, D.R. Somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy subjects and in patients with lesions of the nervous system. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1964, 112: 93-142.
Hari, R., Reinikainen, K., Kaukoranta, E., Hamalainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Penttinen, A., Salminen, J. and Teszner, D. Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 57: 254-263.
Hari, R., Karhu, J., Hamalainen, M., Knuutila, J., Salonen, O., Sams, M. and Vilkman, V. Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: a neuromagnetic study. Eur. J. Neurosci., 1993, 5: 724-734.
Hazemann, P., Audin, G. and Lille, F. Effect of voluntary self-paced movements upon auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39: 247-254.
Hoshiyama, M. and Sheean, G. Changes of somatosensory evoked potentials preceding rapid voluntary movement in Go/No-go choice reaction time task. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 1998, 7: 137-142.
Huttunen, J., Wikstrom, H., Korvenoja, A., Seppalainen, A.M., Aronen, H. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Significance of the second somatosensory cortex in sensorimotor integration: enhancement of sensory responses during finger movements. Neuroreport, 1996, 7: 1009-1012.
Inoue, K., Yamashita, T., Harada, T. and Nakamura, S. Role of human SII cortices in sensorimotor integration. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2002, 113: 1573-1578.
Jones, S.J. An "interference" approach to the study of somatosensory evoked potentials in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1981, 52: 517-530.
Jones, S.J., Halonen, J.P. and Shawkat, F. Centrifugal and centripetal mechanisms involved in the "gating" of cortical SEPs during movement. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 36-45.
Josiassen, R.C., Shagass, C., Roemer, R.A., Ercegovac, D.V. and Straumanis, J.J. Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. Psychophysiology, 1982, 19: 146-159.
Kakigi, R. Ipsilateral and contralateral SEP components following median nerve stimulation: effects of interfering stimuli applied to the contralateral hand. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 64: 246-259.
Kakigi, R. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation. Neurosci. Res., 1994, 20: 165-174.
Kakigi, R., Koyama, S., Hoshiyama, M., Watanabe, S., Shimojo, M. and Kitamura, Y. Gating of somatosensory evoked responses during active finger movements: magnetoencephalographic studies. J. Neurol. Sci., 1995, 128: 195-204.
Kawamura, T., Nakasato, N., Seki, K., Kanno, A., Fujita, S., Fujiwara, S. and Yoshimoto, T. Neuromagnetic evidence of pre-and post-central cortical sources of somatosensory evoked responses. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 100: 44-50.
Lee, R.G. and White, D.G. Modification of the human somatosensory evoked response during voluntary movement. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1974, 36: 53-62.
Lin, Y.Y., Simoes, C., Forss, N. and Hari, R. Differential effects of muscle contraction from various body parts on neuromagnetic somatosensory responses. Neuroimage, 2000, 11: 334-340.
Maeda, K., Kakigi, R., Hoshiyama, M. and Koyama, S. Topography of the secondary somatosensory cortex in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroreport, 1999, 10: 301-306.
Michie, P.T., Bearpark, H.M., Crawford, J.M. and Glue, L.C. The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. Psychophysiology, 1987, 24: 449-463.
Nishihira, Y., Araki, H. and Ishihara, A. Attenuation of somatosensory evoked potentials immediately following rapid reaction movement. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 31: 15-20.
Papakostopoulos, D., Cooper, R. and Crow, H.J. Inhibition of cortical evoked potentials and sensation by self-initiated movement in man. Nature, 1975, 258: 321-324.
Reisin, R.C., Goodin, D.S., Aminoff, M.J. and Mantle, M.M. Effects of different sensory inputs on the median-derived somatosensory evoked potential. Muscle Nerve, 1989, 12: 598-603.
Ridley, R.M. and Ettlinger, G. Impaired tactile learning and retention after removals of the second somatic sensory projection cortex (SII) in the monkey. Brain Res., 1976, 109: 656-660.
Rushton, D.N., Rothwell, J.C. and Craggs, M.D. Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain, 1981, 104: 465-491.
Seyal, M., Ortstadt, J.L., Kraft, L.W. and Gabor, A.J. Effect of movement on human spinal and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology, 1987, 37: 650-655.
Shimazu, H., Kaji, R., Murase, N., Kohara, N., Ikeda, A., Shibasaki, H., Kimura, J. and Rothwell, J.C. Pre-movement gating of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Neuroreport, 1999, 10: 2457-2460.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakata, H., Inui, K., Wasaka, T. et al. Mechanisms of Differences in Gating Effects on Short- and Long-Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Relating to Movement. Brain Topogr 15, 211–222 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023908707851
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023908707851