Skip to main content
Log in

Nondirectiveness and Its Lay Interpretations: The Effect of Counseling Style, Ethnicity and Culture on Attitudes Towards Genetic Counseling Among Jewish and Bedouin Respondents in Israel

  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of ethnicity, culture, and counseling style on the interpretation of nondirectiveness in genetic counseling, a questionnaire containing premarital and prenatal case vignettes in two versions (pessimistic/optimistic) was administered to 281 Jewish and 133 Bedouin respondents. The first study population was comprised of Jewish students enrolled in a university and a community college in the Negev (southern part of Israel). The second study population was comprised of Muslim-Bedouin college students from the same area. The majority of Jewish respondents interpreted the nondirective message as intended by counselors, while the majority of Bedouin respondents did not. Counseling style was found to have a statistically significant effect on the interpretation of the general role of counseling. Gender and susceptibility were not found to have a significant effect on interpretation. Group differences are analyzed through a cultural lens in which different interpretive norms can generate expectations for either nondirectiveness or directiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeliovich, D., Quint, A., Weinberg, N., Verchezon, G., Lerer, I., Eckstein, J., et al. (1996). Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in the orthodox community of Ashkenazi Jews: The Dor Yesharim approach and heterozygote frequency. Eur J Hum Genet, 4, 77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, L. (1994). Public choices and private choices: Legal regulation of genetic testing. In T. Murphy, & M. Lappé (Eds.), Justice and the human genome project (pp. 46-75.) Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angastiniotis, M. A., & Hadjiminas, M. G. (1981). Prevention of thalassemia in Cyprus. Lancet, 1, 369-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angastiniotis, M. A., Kyriakidou, S., & Hadjiminas, M. (1986). How thalassemia was controlled in Cyprus. World Health Forum, 7, 291-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, D. (2000). Analysis and integration of definitions of community genetics. Community Genet, 3, 99-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B., & Pellegrini, A. (1991). Narrative thought and narrative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broide, E., Zeigler, M., Eckstein, J., Bach, G. (1993). Screening for carriers of Tay-Sachs disease in the ultraorthodox Ashkenazi Jewish community in Israel. Am J Med Genet, 47, 21-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, B., & Kolker, A. (1994). Directiveness in prenatal genetic counseling. Women Health, 22, 31-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi, R., Elbedour, K., Weitzman, D., Sheffield V., & Shoham-Vardi, I. (1998). Lowering the burden of hereditary diseases in a traditional inbred community: Ethical aspects of genetic research and its application. Science Context, 11, (3/4), 391-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R. (1998). Can genetic counseling avoid the charge of eugenics? Sci Context, 11, (3/4), 471-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R., Darren, S., ten Have, H., & U. Wiesing (Eds.). (1999). The ethics of genetic screening. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, A., Campion, P., & May, C. (1997). Clinical terminology: Anxiety and confusion amongst families undergoing genetic counseling. Patient Educ Counsel, 32, 81-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, A., & May, C. (1996). Genetic knowledge and family relationships: Two case studies. Health Soc Care Community, 4(3), 166-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. (1992). Ethics are local: Engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research. Soc Sci Med, 35, 1079-1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1991). Is non-directive genetic counselling possible? (Editorial) The Lancet, 338(8773), 998(4).

  • Clarke, A., & Parsons, E. (Eds.). (1996). Culture, kinship and genes: Towards cross-cultural genetics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, A. (1996). Consanguineous marriage and genetics: A positive relationship. In A. Clarke & E. Parsons (Eds.), Culture, kinship and genes pp. 83-97 London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, B., et al. (1994). Prenatal testing for Down syndrome in the Jewish and non-Jewish populations in Israel. Israel J Med Sci, 30, 629-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, C., & Warren, C. (1998). Lethal autonomy: The malfunction of the informed consent mechanism within the context of prenatal diagnosis of genetic variants. Issues Law Med, 14(2), 165-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?—The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, F. (1974). Genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet, 26, 636-659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, H. (2000). Simulated dreams: Jewish youth and Zionism. London: Berghan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoedemaeker, R., & ten Have, H. (1998). Geneticization: The Cyprus case. J Med Philos, 23(3), 274-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino, K. (Ed.). (1997). Japanese and western bioethics: Studies in moral diversity. Dodrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, P. (1999). Thalassemia prevention in Cyprus. In R. Chadwick et al. (Eds.), The ethics of genetic screening (pp. 55-67) Dodrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katriel, T. (1986). Talking straight: Dugri speech in Jewish Sabra culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1992). The past as prologue: Race, class, and gene discrimination. In G. Annas & S. Elias (Eds.). Gene mapping: Using law and ethics as guides (pp. 94-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kressel, G. (1992). Shame and Gender. Anthropol Q, 65(1), 34-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kressel, G. (1986). Prespective patrilateral parallel cousin marriage: The perspective of thebride's father and brothers. Ethnology, 25, 163-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewando-Hundt, G., Shoham-Vardi, I., Beckerelg, I., Belmaker, I., Kassem F., & Abu Jaafar, A. (2001). Knowledge, action and resistance: The selective use of prenatal screening among Bedouin women of the Negev, Israel. Soc Sci Med, 52, 561-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, A. (1997). As Nomadism ends: The Bedouin of the Negev. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mernissi, F. (1987). Beyond the veil: Male–female dynamics in modem Muslim society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittman, I., Crombleholme, W., Green, J., & Golbus, M. (1998). Reproductive genetic counseling to Asian-Pacific and Latin American immigrants. J Genet Counsel, 7(1): 49-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council [NAS]. (1975). Genetic screening: Programs, principles and research. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (United States) [NIH]—Working Group on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of the Human Genome Research [ELSI] Task Force on genetic testing (Neil A. Holtzman, chair). (1997). Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States: Principles and recommendations. National Institutes of Health.

  • National Society of Genetic Counselors, US. (1997). What is genetic counseling? Wallingford, PA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panter-Brick, C. (1991). Parental responses to consanguinity and genetic disease in Saudi-Arabia. Soc Sci Med, 33, 1295-1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parens, E, & Asch, A. (Eds.). (2000). Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilnick, A. (2002). There are no rights and wrongs in these situations: Identifying interactional difficulties in genetic counseling. Sociol Health Illness, 24(1), 66-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions. (1983). The ethical, social and legal implications of genetic screening, counseling, and education programs (18). Washington, D.C.

  • Raz, A. (in press). Status disclosure: Genetic counseling as an arena for negotiation. Stud Symbolic Interaction, 26, 147-167.

  • Raz, A. (in press). Aysha: Genetics education and community engagement in a consanguineous Arab-Bedouin population in Israel. Health: Interdisciplin J Soc Study Health Illness.

  • Resta, R. (1997). Eugenics and nondirectiveness in genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel, 6, 255-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R., & Foster, M. (2000). Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics, 28(1), 41-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh, S., et al. (1995). Premarital genetic counseling to consanguineous couples. Soc Sci Med, 41(9), 1301-1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatoyannopoulos, G. (1974). Problems of screening and counselling in the hemoglobinopathies. In: A. G. Motulsky & W, Lenz (Eds.), Birth defects. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D., & Sue, D. (1990). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Alora, A., & Lumitao, J. M. (Eds.). (2001). Beyond a western bioethics: Voices from the developing world. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, V., & Marsh, F. (1992). Ethical principles and cultural integrity in health care delivery: Asian ethnocultural perspectives in genetic services. J Genet Counsel, 1, 81-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J. (2001). Multicultural education and genetic counseling. Clin Genet, 59, 143-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J., & Mittman, I. (1993). A teaching framework for cross-cultural genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel, 2(3), 159-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, D., Shoham-Vardi, I., ElBedour, K., Belmaker, I., Siton, Y., & Carmi, R. (2000). Factors affecting utilization of prenatal testing for fetal abnormalities in a traditional society. Community Genet 3(2), 45-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, D., & Fletcher, J. (1989). Ethics and human genetics: A cross-cultural perspective. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, D. (1998). Eugenics is alive and well: A survey of genetic professionals around the world. Science Context, 11(3/4), 493-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1985). Community approaches to the control of hereditary diseases (Unpublished WHO document HMG/AG/85.10). Geneva: Hereditary Diseases Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1997). Community control of genetic and congenital disorders (EMRO Technical Publications, Series 24). Alexandria: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2002). Genomics and world health: Report of the advisory committee on Health Research Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, G., & Jung, C. (1995). Nondirectiveness and genetic counseling. J Gen Counsel, 4, 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aviad E. Raz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raz, A.E., Atar, M. Nondirectiveness and Its Lay Interpretations: The Effect of Counseling Style, Ethnicity and Culture on Attitudes Towards Genetic Counseling Among Jewish and Bedouin Respondents in Israel. Journal of Genetic Counseling 12, 313–332 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023901005451

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023901005451

Navigation