Skip to main content

SEMG Evaluations: An Overview

Abstract

This article reviews the current techniques of surface electromyography (SEMG) assessment. Discussed are static, dynamic, and combination assessment techniques and the rational for their use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Basmajian, J. (1967). Muscles alive: Their function revealed by Electromyography (2nd ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, J., & DeLuca, C. (1985). Muscles alive: Their function revealed by electromyography (5th ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T., Stoyva, J., Adler, C., & Mullaney, D. (1973). EMG biofeedback and tension headache: A controlled outcome study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 35, 484-496.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Andrews, J., & Johnson, R. J. (1986). Electrodiagnosis: An anatomical and clinical approach. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colloca, C. J., & Keller, T. S. (2001). Electromyographic reflex responses to mechanical force, manually assisted spinal manipulative therapy. Spine, 26, 1117-1124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cram, J. R. (1986). Clinical EMG: Muscle scanning and diagnostic manual for surface recordings. Seattle, WA: Clinical Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, J. R., & Engstrom, D. (1986). Patterns of neuromuscular activity in pain and non-pain patients. Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 9, 55-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, J., Kasman, G., & Holtz, J. (1998). Introduction to surface electromyography. Maryland: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, C. C. S., & Donaldson, M. (1990). Multi-channel EMG assessment and treatment techniques. In J. Cram (Ed.), Clinical EMG for surface recordings (Vol. 2). Seattle, WA: Clinical Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, C. C. S., Skubick, D., Clasby, R., & Cram, J. (1994). The evaluation of trigger-point activity using dynamic EMG techniques. American Journal of Pain Management, 4, 118-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, C. C. S., Snelling, L. S., MacInnis, A. L., Sella, G. E., & Mueller, H. H. (2002). Diffuse muscular coactivation (DMC) as a potential source of pain in fibromyalgia—Part 1. NeuroRehabilitation, 17.

  • Keller, T. S., & Colloca, C. J. (2000). Mechanical force spinal manipulation increases trunk muscle strength assessed by electromyography: A comparative clinical trial. Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapy, 23, 585-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, C., Moritani, H., Hirschfeld, & Forssberg, H. (1990). Deficits in reciporal inhibition of children with cerebral palsy as revealed by H reflex testing. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 32, 974-984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. J. (1995). The validity of thoracolumbar paraspinal scanning EMG as a diagnostic test: An examination of the current literature. Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapy, 18, 482-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E. (2000a). Muscular dynamics: Electromyography assessment of energy and motion. Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E. (2000b). Surface electromyography testing: Sensitivity, specificy, positive and negative predicitive values. Europa Medico-physica, 36, 183-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sihvonen, T., Partanen, J., Hanninen, O., & Soimaakallio, S. (1991). Electric behavior of low back muscles during lumbar pelvic rhythm in low back pain patients and healthy controls. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 72, 1080-1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skubick, D., Clasby, R., Donaldson, C. C. S., & Marshall, W. (1993). Carpal tunnel syndrome as an expression of muscular dysfunction in the neck. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 3, 31-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travell, J., & Simons, D. (1983). Myofascial pain and dysfunction: The trigger point manual. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triano, J. J. (1994). The validity of thoracolumbar paraspinal scanning EMG as a diagnostic test: Examination of the current literature. Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapy, 17, 539-551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. L., & Basmajian, J. V. (1978). Assessment of paraspinal electromyographic activity in normal subjects and in chronic back pain patients using a muscle biofeedback device. In E. Asmussen & K. Jorgensen (Eds.), International series on biomechanics (VIB, pp. 319-324).

  • Wolf, S. L., Nacht, M., & Kelly, J. L. (1982). EMG feedback training during dynamic movement for low back pain patients. Behavior Therapy, 13, 395-406.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Donaldson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donaldson, S., Donaldson, M. & Snelling, L. SEMG Evaluations: An Overview. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28, 121–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023858524879

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023858524879

  • surface electromyography
  • assessment
  • static
  • dynamic
  • review