Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuropathology Considerations: Clinical and SEMG/Biofeedback Applications

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

SEMG investigation protocols are described within the neurological framework. A neuro- anatomic pathway is utilized including muscular disease, neuromuscular junction conditions, peripheral neuropathy, radiculopahy, myleopathy, brainstem disorders, cerebellar disorders, subcortical and cortical disease. SEMG findings within the clinical presentation of those pathologies are aimed at improving the diagnostic process and serve to focus the SEMG neuromuscular reeducation (biofeedback) component of the overall treatment plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, R., & Victor, M. (1989). Principles of neurology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Basmajian, J. V., Regeon, E., & Wolf, S. L. (1977). Developing strategies for biofeedback applications in neurologically handicapped patients. Physical Therapy, 57, 402-407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian, J. V., Gowland, C., Brandstater, M. E., Swanson, L., & Trotter, J. (1982). EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients. A pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 612-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykoushev, S. D., Baykousheva, V., & Rathkolb, O. (1990). Myobiofeedback in motor re-education of wrist and fingers after hemispherical stroke. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 30, 89-92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder-Macleod, S. A. (1983). Biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation. In J.V. Basmajian (Ed.), Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians (2nd ed. pp. 73-89). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, B. R., Baker, L. L., & Waters, R. L. (1979). Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: An automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 497-502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braddom, R. L. (Ed.). (1996). Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, W. G., Daroff, R. D., Fenichel, G. M., & Marsden, C. D. (1991). Neurology in clinical practice. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazis, P.W., Masdeu, J. C., & Biller, J. (1990). Localization in clinical neurology (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. J. (1992). A comparison of the abnormal patterns of cerebral activation associated with essential and neuropathic tremor. Neurology 42(Suppl. 3): 423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudny, J., Grynbaum, B. B., & Korein, J. (1974). Spasmodic torticollis: Treatment by feedback display of the EMG. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 55, 403-408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchthal, F., & Madsen, A. (1950). Synchronous activity in normal and atrophic muscle. ECG Clinical Neurophysiol, 2, 425-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauraugh, J. H., & Kim, S. (2002). Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke, 33, 1589-1594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cauraugh, J. H., Light, K., Kim, S., Thigpen, M., & Behrman, A. L. (2000). Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: Recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Journal of Stroke, 31, 1360-1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozean, C. V., Hubbell, S. L., & Pease, W. S. (1988). Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 401-405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Draizar, A. (1984). Clinical EMG feedback in motor speech disorders, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65, 481-484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, P. J. (Ed.). (1992). Peripheral neuropathy: New concepts and treatments, Neurological Clinics, 10, 601-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender, P., Finley, W., Niman, C., & Standley, J. (1976). Frontal EMG biofeedback training of athetoid cerebral palsy patients. A report of six cases. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 1, 169-182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. G. (1988). Congenital myasthenic syndromes, Journal of Child Neurological, 3, 233-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. G., Fukuoka, T., & Lang, B. (1987). Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome IgG: Early morphologic effects and immunolocalization at the motor endplate. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 505, 333-345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbain, D., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (1992). Chronic cervical pain: Radiculopathy or brachialgia, non-interventional treatment. Spine, 17(10S), 362-366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglsang-Fredriksen, A. (1981). Electrical activity and force during voluntary contraction of normal and diseased muscle. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica Supplement, 63, 83-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, J. J., & Sella, G. E. (2001). Inclinometry, SEMG and hand dynamometry in clinical and disability medicine. Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S., Bloedel, J. R., & Lechtenberg, R. (1981). Disorders of the Cerebellum. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haerer, A. (1992). Dejongís the neurologic examination, (5th ed.) Philadelphia: JB Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T. (1990). Current therapy in neurologic disease—3, Philadelphia: B. C. Decker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (1991). Principles of neural science, (3rd ed.). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, J. D. (1986). Neurophysiologic evaluation of patients with low back pain. Seminars in Neurology, 6, 372-375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, C. S. (Ed.). (1988). Advances in neuroimmunology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 540.

  • Riley, D. E. (1990). Cortical–basal ganglionic neck degeneration. Neurology, 40, 1203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rivest, J., & Marsden, C.D. (1990). Trunk and head tremor as isolated manifestations of dystonia. Movement Disorder, 5, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. N. (1991). Comprehensive neurology. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E. (1995). Neuro-muscular testing with surface EMG. Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E. (1997). Muscles in motion: S-EMG analysis of the range of motion of the human body (2nd ed.). Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E. (2000a). Muscular dynamics: Electromyographic assessment of energy and motion. Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E. (2000b). Guidelines for neuromuscular re-education with SEMG biofeedback. Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sella, G. E., & Finn, R. E. (2001). Myofascial pain syndrome: Manuel trigger point and SEMG biofeedback therapy methods. Martins Ferry, OH: GENMED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. (Ed.). (1988). Disorders of voluntary muscle (5th ed.) Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D., & Braunwald, E. (Eds.). (1991). Harrisonís principles of internal medicine (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

    G. E. Sella

Authors
  1. G. E. Sella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sella, G.E. Neuropathology Considerations: Clinical and SEMG/Biofeedback Applications. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28, 93–105 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023854423970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023854423970

Search

Navigation