Abstract
Americans believe that Congress' most important duties are passing laws and dealing with the nation's problems. A majority, however, disapprove of the way that these functions are carried out. Drawing on procedural justice literature, this article examines the role that process perceptions play relative to preferred outcome in people's legitimacy assessments. In particular, a controlled experiment tests the argument that the weight assigned to procedural justice considerations relative to policy considerations is in part a function of the information environment and the types of issues under deliberation.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barrett-Howard E., and Tyler, Tom (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 296–304.
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A. (1989). Issue Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chatterjee, Samprit, and Price, Bertram (1991). Regression Analysis by Example. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Domke, David, Shah, Dhavan V., and Wackman, Daniel B. (1998). Moral referendums: values, news media, and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication 15: 301–321.
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Durr, Robert H, Gilmour, John B., and Wolbrecht, Christina (1997). Explaining congressional approval. American Journal of Political Science 41: 175–207.
Fiorina, Morris (1996). Divided Government, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Folger, Robert, and Konovsky, Mary A. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victim's layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21: 630–650.
Hardin, Russel (1998). Trust in government. In Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi (eds.), Trust and Governance, pp. 9–27. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (1995). Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (1998). The media's role in public negativity toward Congress: distinguishing emotional reactions and cognitive evaluations. American Journal of Political Science 42: 475–498.
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (2001). Process preferences and American politics: what people want government to be. American Political Science Review 95: 145–153.
Lind, E. Allan, Tyler, Tom, and Huo, Yuen (1997). Procedural context and culture: variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 767–780.
Long, J. Scott (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde (2002).Of mood and morals: the dynamics of opinion on abortion and gay rights. In Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox (eds.), Understanding Public Opinion, pp. 121–148. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Rahn, Wendy, and Brehm, John (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41: 993–1023.
Sears, David, and Lau, Richard (1983). Inducing apparently self-interested political preferences, American Political Science Review 27: 223–252.
Thibaut, John, and Walker, Laurens (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tyler, Tom (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendant's evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review 18: 51–74.
Tyler, Tom (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 830–838.
Tyler, Tom (1990). Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tyler, Tom (1994). Governing and diversity: the effect of fair decisionmaking procedures on the legitimacy of government. Law and Society Review 28: pp. 809–831.
Tyler, Tom R., Boeckmann, Robert J., Smith, Heather J., and Huo, Yuen J. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tyler, Tom, and Degoey, Peter (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 482–97.
Tyler, Tom R., Rasinski, Kenneth K., and McGraw, K Kathleen (1985). The influence of perceived injustice on support for political authorities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15: 700–725.
Watts Mark DeWitt (1997). Framing congress: media coverage of the U.S. Congress and its impact on public opinion. Dissertation Thesis. University of Minnesota.
Weatherford, M. Stephen (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 86:146–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gangl, A. Procedural Justice Theory and Evaluations of the Lawmaking Process. Political Behavior 25, 119–149 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023847829172
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023847829172