Abstract
In the atmospheric Čerenkov technique γ-rays are detected against the abundant background produced by hadronic showers. In order to improve the signal to noise ratio of theexperiment, it is necessary to reject a significant fraction of hadronic showers. Traditional background rejection methods based on image shape parameters have been extensively used for the data from imaging telescopes. However, non-imaging Čerenkov telescopes have to develop very different means of statistically identifying and removing cosmic ray events. Some of the parameters, which could be potentially important for non-imaging arrays, are the temporal and spectral differences, the lateral distributions and density fluctuations of Čerenkov photons generated by γ-ray and hadron primaries. Here we study the differences in fluctuations of Čerenkov photon density in the light pool at the observation level from showers initiated by photons and those initiated by protons or heavier nuclei. The database of simulated events for the PACT array has been used to evaluate the efficiency of the new technique. Various types of density fluctuations like the short range and medium range fluctuations as well as flatness parameter are studied. The estimated quality factors reflect the efficiencies with which the hadrons can be rejected from the data. Since some of these parameters are independent, the cuts may be applied in tandem and we demonstrate that the proton rejection efficiency of ∼90% can be achieved. Use of density fluctuations is particularly suited for wavefront sampling observations and it seems to be a good technique to improve the signal to noise ratio.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aharonian, F. A. et al.: 1989, 21st Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Adelaide, Australia, Vol. 4, pp. 246.
Aharonian, F. A. and Akerlof, C. W.: 1997, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47, 273.
Aharonian, F. A. et al.: 1997, High Energy Stereoscopic System, Letter of Intent, Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg.
Aharonian, F. A. et al.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 546, 898.
Arqueros, F. et al.: 1997, in O. C. de Jager (ed.), Towards a Major Atmospheric Čerenkov Detector -V, Berg-en-Dal, Kruger National Park, South Africa, pp. 240.
Arqueros, F. et al.: 2002, Astropart. Phys. 17, 293.
Badran H. M. and Weekes, T. C.: 1997, Astropart. Phys. 7, 307.
Bhat, P. N.: 1998, ‘High Energy Astronomy and Astrophysics’, in P. C. Agrawal and P. R. Vishwanath (eds), Proc. of the Int. Colloquium to Commemorate the Golden Jubilee Year of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, University Press, pp. 370.
Blanch, O. et al.: 1998, TheMAGIC Telescope for Gamma-ray Astrophysics above 10-30 GeV, Letter of Intent, Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich.
Bugayov, V. V. et al.: 2002, Astropart. Phys. 17, 41.
Catanese, M. and Weekes, T. C.: 1999, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 111, 1193.
Cawley, M. F. and Weekes, T. C.: 1995, Experimental Astronomy 6, 7.
’Celeste’ Proposal: 1996, http://wwwcenbg.in2p3.fr/Astroparticule.
Chitnis, V. R. and Bhat, P. N.: 1998, Astropart. Phys. 9, 45.
Chitnis, V. R. and Bhat, P. N.: 1999, Astropart. Phys. 12, 45.
Chitnis, V. R. and Bhat, P. N.: 2001, Astropart. Phys. 15, 29.
Chitnis, V. R. and Bhat, P. N.: 2002, Bull. Astr. Soc. India 30, 345.
Cronin, J. W., Gibbs, K. G. and Weekes, T. C.: 1993, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 883.
De Naurois, M. et al.: 2000, in D. A. Aharonian and H. H. Volk (eds), AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 558, pp. 540.
De Naurois, M. et al.: 2002, Astrophys. J. 566, 343.
Fegan, D. J.: 1997, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Particle Phys. 23, 1013.
Ford, R. L. and Nelsen, W.: 1978, SLAC Report #210.
Heck, D. et al.: 1998, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Report, FZKA 6019.
Hillas, A. M. and Patterson, J. R.: 1990, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Particle Phys. 16, 1271.
Hillas, A. M.: 1996, Space Sci. Rev. 75, 175.
Hofmann, W., Lampeitl, H., Konopelko, A. and Krawczynski, H.: 2000, Astropart. Phys. 12, 207.
Knapp, J. and Heck, D.: 1998, EAS Simulation with CORSIKA, V5.60: A User's Guide.
Linsley, J.: 1962, U.S. Standard Atmosphere, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington.
Majumdar, P. et al., Astropart. Phys. Astro-ph/0204112, (in press).
Nelson, W. R.: 1985, ‘The EGS4 Code System’, SLAC Report 265.
Ong, R. et al.: 1995, in M. Cresti (ed.), Towards a Major Atmospheric Čerenkov Detector - IV, Padova, pp. 261.
Ong, R.: 1996, Il Nuovo Cim. 19, 971.
Ong, R. and Covault, C. E.: 1997, in O. C. de Jager (ed.), Towards a Major Atmospheric Čerenkov Detector - V, Berg-en-Dal, Kruger National Park, South Africa, pp. 247.
Ong, R.: 1998, Phys. Rep. 305, 93.
Oser, S. et al.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 547, 949.
Rahman, M. A. et al.: 2001, Experimental Astron. 11, 113.
Rao, M. V. S. and Sinha, S.: 1988, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Particle Phys. 14, 811.
Roberts, M. D. et al.: 1998, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Particle Phys. 24, 225.
Tümer, O. T. et al.: 1990, Nucl. Phys. B. (Proc. Suppl.) 14A, 351.
Vishwanath, P. R.: 1993, in R. C. Lamb (ed.), Towards a Major Atmospheric Čerenkov Detector - II for TeV Astro/Particle Physics, Calgary, Canada, pp. 115.
Weekes, T. C.: 1988, Physics Reports 160, 1.
Weekes, T. C.: 1989, Astrophys. J. 342, 379.
Weekes, T. C.: 1996a, Space Sci. Rev. 75, 1.
Weekes, T. C. et al.: 1996b, Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System, (VERITAS), Proposal, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chitnis, V.R., Bhat, P.N. Gamma-Hadron Separation using Čerenkov Photon Density Fluctuations. Experimental Astronomy 13, 77–100 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023784403643
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023784403643