Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trusted Software's Holy Grail

  • Published:
Software Quality Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss what I believe is the grand challenge facing the software quality research community: the ability to accurately determine, in the very earliest stages of development, the techniques that will be needed to achieve desired levels of non-functional attributes such as: reliability, availability, fault tolerance, testability, maintainability, performance, software safety, and software security. I will further consider the associated technical and economic tradeoffs that must be made in order to: (1) achieve these desired qualities, and (2) to certify that these qualities will be exhibited when the software is deployed. And I will also take into account the fact that satisfying a particular level of each attribute requires specific expenditures, some of these attributes conflict with each other, and when the environment or usage profile of the software is modified, all guarantees or claims of quality should be viewed suspiciously until additional evidence is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Morell, L. and Voas, J. 1993. A framework for defining semantic metrics, J. of Systems and Software 20: 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viega, J. and McGraw, G. 2001. Building Secure Software, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. 1997. Can clean pipes produce dirty water?, IEEE Software 14(4): 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. 1998. Certifying off-the-shelf software components, IEEE Computer 31(6): 53–59. (Translated into Japanese and reprinted in Nikkei Computer magazine.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. 1998. Maintaining component-based systems, IEEE Software 15(4): 22–27. (Reprinted in the Moscow Open Systems Journal, Volume 6, 1998.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. 2000. Can chaotic methods improve software quality predictions?, Quality Time Column, IEEE Software 17(5): 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. 2000. Toward a usage-based software certification process, IEEE Computer 33(8): 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. 2001. Faster, better, and cheaper, Quality Time Column, IEEE Software 18(3): 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. and Miller, K. 1995. Software testability: the new verification, IEEE Software 12(3): 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cigital, Inc., 21351 Ridgetop Circle, Suite 400, Dulles, VA, 20165, USA

    Jeffrey Voas

Authors
  1. Jeffrey Voas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voas, J. Trusted Software's Holy Grail. Software Quality Journal 11, 9–17 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023679926998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023679926998

Search

Navigation