Abstract
In an optimally managed economy, green nationalexpenditure is equal to the linearization of the Hamiltonian from theproblem of maximizing discounted social utility. Herein, we utilize theadjoint conditions to add to the basis for viewing green NNP as an index ofsocial utility under ideal conditions and to show the equality of netnational income and expenditure. The results apply even when returns toscale are increasing or decreasing. Unpriced, net environmental benefitsshould be incorporated into comprehensive NNP in much the same way as thedisutility of labor. Otherwise, current practices of the national accountscan be defended, including the treatment of capital gains.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asheim, G. B. (1996), ‘Capital Gains and Net National Product in Open Economies’, Journal of Public Economics 59(3), 419-434.
Cairns, R. D. (2001), ‘Seeing the Trees as a Forest: What Counts in Green Accounting’, Ecological Economics 36, 61-69.
Costanza, R. et al. (1997), ‘The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital’, Nature (15 May) 387, 253-260.
Hartwick, J. M. (2000), National Accounting and Capital. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
Weitzman, M. L. (1976), ‘On the Welfare Significance of Net National Product’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 156-162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cairns, R.D. Reconciling the Green Accounts. Environmental and Resource Economics 25, 51–63 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023657029623
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023657029623