This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Brown, A. (1999). The Darwin Wars: How Stupid Genes Became Selfish Gods. London, UK: Simon & Schuster.
Gintis, H. (2002). Review of “Dawkins vs. Gould.” Human Nature Review 2:3.
Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 205: 581-598.
Morris, R. (2001). The Evolutionists: The Struggle for Darwin's Soul. New York: Freeman.
Ruse, M. (1999). Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction? Cambridge, MA, UK: Harvard University Press.
Segerstråle, U. (2000). Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sterelny, K. & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mysterud, I. Book Review: Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the Fittest. Kim Sterelny. Cambridge: Icon Books/Totem Books, 2001. ISBN 1-84046-249-3. 156 pp.. Population and Environment 24, 445–447 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023647009024
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023647009024