Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguishing Between Conceptualizations of Attachment: Clinical Implications in Marriage and Family Therapy

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Authors described four distinct conceptualizations of the construct of attachment and identified clinical implications associated with each. Three of the conceptualizations, which are influenced by the work of Bowlby and Ainsworth, seem to have some empirical support; these conceptualizations are compatible with systemic and social constructionist approaches to family therapy. The other conceptualization— Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD)—contradicts the extensive body of literature associated with the Bowlby/Ainsworth traditions and tends to pathologize children. Therefore, family therapists interested in attachment are encouraged to maintain conceptual clarity in their clinical work and are further encouraged to rely on clinical conceptualizations and interventions that are consistent with the work of Bowlby and Ainsworth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachment beyond intimacy. American Psychologist, 44,709–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Waters, E.,& Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Ed., Text Rev. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Booth, P. B.,& Wark, L. (2001, March). Consumer update: Children's attachment relationships. Washington, DC: American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, Item I066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng-Hall, J. (1991). An appreciation of John Bowlby: His significance for family Therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng-Hall, J. (1995). Creating a secure family base: Some implications of attachment theory for family therapy. Family Process, 34, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng-Hall, J. (1999). Family therapy and couple therapy: Toward greater security. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 625–645). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child's ties. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp.3–20). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1984). Adult Attachment Interview Protocol. Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Berkeley.

  • Hanson, R. F., & Spratt, E. G. (2000). Reactive attachment disorder: What we know About the disorder and implications for treatment. Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, 5(2), 132–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M., & Greenberg, L. S. (1995). The emotionally focused approach to problems in adult attachment. In N. S. Jacobson & A. S. Gurman (Eds.), The clinical handbook of marital therapy (2nd ed., pp. 121–141). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M., & Millikin, J. (2001). Attachment injuries in couples relationships: A new perspective on impasses in couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M., & Whiffen, V. (1999). Made to measure: Attachment styles in couples therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 6, 366–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karen, R. (1990, February). Becoming attached. The Atlantic Monthly, 35–70.

  • Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., & Somolon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/ disoriented during the Ainsworth strange situation. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E.M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 121–160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, K. (1996). Children at risk for reactive attachment disorder: Assessment, diagnosis and treatment. Progress: Family Systems Research and Therapy, 5, 83–98. Encino, CA: Phillips Graduate Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. & O'Connor, T. G. (1999). Implications of attachment theory for child care policies. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 823–844). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (1998). Attachment in adulthood. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 3–21). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. A. (1999). Early attachment and later development. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 265–286). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. E. & Marwell, G. (1976). Self-esteem. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Wilson, R. J., & Murphy, M. J. (1999). Distancing strategies. In C. A. Smith (Ed.), The encyclopedia of parenting theory and research (pp. 374–376). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeanah, C. H. (1996). Beyond insecurity: A reconceptualizaton of attachment disorders of infancy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werner-Wilson, R.J., Davenport, B.R. Distinguishing Between Conceptualizations of Attachment: Clinical Implications in Marriage and Family Therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy 25, 179–193 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023620117087

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023620117087

Navigation