Sex Roles

, Volume 48, Issue 9–10, pp 433–445 | Cite as

Not a Laughing Matter: Sexual Harassment as “Material” on Workplace-Based Situation Comedies

  • Beth Montemurro


In her book Sexual Harassment of Working Women Catherine MacKinnon (1979) suggested that “Trivialization of sexual harassment has been a major means through which its invisibility has been enforced. Humor, which may reflect unconscious hostility, has been a major form of that trivialization” (p. 52). In other words, making jokes at women's expense and treating sexual harassment as not serious have contributed to its persistence. Situation comedies can be seen as gauges for what is considered humorous in American culture. To explore the tone of and mood toward sexual harassment in contemporary American society, themes and content of “humorous” material on 56 episodes of five workplace-based situation comedies were examined. Results showed that although sexual harassment is rarely discussed on situation comedies, gender harassment is frequently used as “material,” which leads to further trivialization of a serious social problem.

sexual harassment gender harassment situation comedy television 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139-158.Google Scholar
  2. Charney, D. A., & Russell, R. C. (1994). An overview of sexual harassment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 10-17.Google Scholar
  3. De Judicibus, M., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Blaming the target of sexual harassment: Impact of gender role, sexist attitudes, and work role. Sex Roles, 44, 401-417.Google Scholar
  4. Douglas, S. (1996). Where the girls are: Growing up female with the mass media. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Dow, B. J. (1996). Prime-time feminism: Television, media culture and the women's movement since 1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L. M., Gold, Y., & Ormerod, M. (1988). Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholorly garb. Phychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 329-340.Google Scholar
  7. Ford, T. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094-1107.Google Scholar
  8. Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K. (2000). Television situation comedies: Female weight, male negative comments, and audience reactions. Sex Roles, 42, 925-932.Google Scholar
  9. Francis, L. E. (1994). Laughter, the best mediation: Humor as emotion management in interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 17, 147-163.Google Scholar
  10. Fung, A., & Ma, E. (2000). Formal vs. informal use of television and sex-role stereotyping in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 42, 57-81.Google Scholar
  11. Giles, H., Bourhis, R., Gadfield, N. J., Davies, G. J., & Davies, A. P. (1976). Cognitive aspects of humour in social interaction. In T. Chapman & H. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 139-154). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Reprinted 1996)Google Scholar
  12. Giuffre, P., & Williams, C. (1994). Boundary lines: Labeling sexual harassment in restaurants. Gender and Society, 8, 378-401.Google Scholar
  13. Grauerholz, E., & King, A. (1997). Prime time sexual harassment. Violence Against Women, 3, 129-148.Google Scholar
  14. Gunter, B. (1995). Television and gender representation. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  15. Gutek, B. (1985). Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. hooks, b. (1997). Cultural criticism and transformation. Northampton, MA: Media Education.Google Scholar
  17. Horan, P., & Semora, B. (1997, April). Sexual harassment in the workplace: What can sociological research contribute? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  18. Jhally, S. (1991). Dreamworlds: Desire, sex, power in rock video. Northampton, MA: Media Education.Google Scholar
  19. Kalof, L., Eby, K. K., Matheson, J. L., & Kroska, R. J. (2001). The influence of race and gender on student self-reports of sexual harassment by college professors. Gender & Society, 15, 282-302.Google Scholar
  20. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Marc, D. (1997). Comic visions: Television comedy and American culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Marin, A. J., & Guadagno, R. (1999). Perceptions of sexual harassment victims as a functioning of labeling and reporting. Sex Roles, 41, 921-940.Google Scholar
  25. Matchen, J., & De Souza, E. (2000). The sexual harassment of faculty members by students. Sex Roles, 42, 295-306.Google Scholar
  26. McKinley, E. G. (1997). Beverly Hills, 90210: Television, gender, and identity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  27. Milkie, M. A. (1994). Social world approach to cultural studies: Mass media and gender in the adolescent peer group. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 354-380.Google Scholar
  28. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2000). The experience of sexual harassment among grade school students: Early socialization of female subordination? Sex Roles, 43, 1-17.Google Scholar
  29. Paldui, M. A. (1996). Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  30. Press, A. (1991). Women watching television: Class, gender, and generation in the American television experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  31. Renzetti, C. M., & Curran, D. J. (1999). Women, men and society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  32. Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and consequences about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21, 341-360.Google Scholar
  33. TV Guide. (1997, September 13). Fall TV Preview.Google Scholar
  34. Vande Berg, L. R., & Streckfuss, D. (1992). Prime-time television's portrayal of women and the world of work: A demographic profile. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36, 195-208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth Montemurro
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Social SciencesPennsylvania State University, AbingtonAbington

Personalised recommendations