Skip to main content
Log in

Susceptibility of European pear cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae using immature fruit and detached leaf assays

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The susceptibility of thirty-three pear cultivars and two pear rootstocks to four virulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae was evaluated by inoculating detached immature fruits and young leaves. The four strains were similarly virulent and did not show cultivar specificity although they were isolated from different pear cultivars and exhibited different biochemical profiles. The most frequently planted pear cultivars, Conference, Abate Fetel, General Leclerc, Williams, D. Comice, El Dorado, Alexandrine, B. Anjou, Passe Crassane and the rootstock OHxF 333 were susceptible to P. syringae pv. syringae. Maximal severity values were obtained on 'Preguystar' leaves (about 90%). The rootstock Winter Nelis was less susceptible. Results with immature fruit and detached leaf assays agreed with field observations on cultivar susceptibility to bacterial blast. However, the detached leaf test gave a more accurate prediction and has the advantages that symptoms develop quickly (48 h), and leaves are available for a longer period of time than fruits. This method is proposed as a rapid and reproducible screening system of cultivar susceptibility to bacterial blast of pear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen GL, Menkissoglou O and Lindow SE (1991) Occurrence and properties of copper-tolerant strains of Pseudomonas syringae isolated from fruit trees in California. Phytopathology 81: 648-656

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker BTP and Grove O (1914) A bacterial disease of fruit blossom. Annals of Applied Biology 1: 85-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Camele I and Iacobellis NS (1998) Presenza di Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae su pero in Basilicata. Informatore Fitopatologico 11: 25-28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye DW (1956) Blast of pear. The Orchardist (NZ) 29: 5-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvira-Recuenco M and Taylor JD (2001) Resistance to bacterial blight (Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi) in spanish pea (Pisum sativum) landraces. Euphytica 118: 305-311

    Google Scholar 

  • Endert E and Ritchie DF (1984) Detection of pathogenicity, measurement of virulence, and determination of strain virulence in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Plant Disease 68: 677-680

    Google Scholar 

  • English H, Devay JE and Ogawa JM (1980) Bacterial canker and blast of deciduous fruits. Leaflet 2155. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercolani GL (1967) Aspetti di Pseudomonas syringae nei fruitteti emiliani. Informatore Fitopatologico 17: 205-215

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy PC and Lloyd AB (1983) Pseudomonas: The fluorescent Pseudomonads. In: Fahy PC and Persley GJ (eds) Plant Bacterial Diseases-A Diagnostic Guide (pp 141-188) Academic Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Fett WF and Jones SB (1982) Role of bacterial immobilization in race-specific resistance of soybean to Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea. Phytopathology 72: 488-492

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross DC, Cody YS, Proebsting EL Jr, Radamaker GK and Spotts RA (1984) Ecotypes and pathogenicity of icenucleation-active Pseudomonas syringae isolated from deciduous fruit tree orchards. Phytopathology 74: 241-248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwiger LA and Webster DM (1984) Phytoalexin production in five cultivars of peas differentially resistant to three races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. Phytopathology 74: 1312-1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AL and Aldwinckle HS (1990) Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases, APS Press, St. Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • King EO, Ward MK and Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocianin and fluorescein. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 44: 301-307

    Google Scholar 

  • Latorre BA and Jones AL (1979) Pseudomonas morsprunorum, the cause of bacterial canker of sour cherry in Michigan and its epiphytic association with P. syringae. Phytopathology 69: 335-339

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelliot RA and Stead ED (1987) Methods in Plant Pathology, Vol 2, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luisetti J and Paulin JP (1972) Etudes sur les bactérioses des arbres fruitiers. III. Recherche du Pseudomonas syringae (Van Hall) à la surface des organs aériens du poirier et étude de ses variations quantitatives. Annals of Phytopathologie 4: 215-227

  • Manceau C, Lalande JC, Lachaud G, Chartier R and Paulin JP (1990) Bacterial colonization of flowers and leaf surface of pear trees. Acta Horticulturae 273: 73-81

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelt EL and Hatting MJ (1986) Bacterial blister bark and blight of fruit spurs of apple in south Africa caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Plant Disease 70: 403-405

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelt EL and Hatting MJ (1988) Resident populations of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on leaves, blossoms and fruits of apple and pear trees. Journal of Phytopathology 121: 135-142

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeen WE (1955) Pear blast in Vancouver Island. Phytopathology 45: 629-632

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos E and Vilardell P (1991) Relationships among population levels of Pseudomonas syringae, amount of ice nuclei, and incidence of blast of dormant flower buds in commercial pear orchards in Catalunya, Spain. Phytopathology 81: 113-119

    Google Scholar 

  • Moragrega C (1997) Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae-pear interaction. Affecting factors and activity of several phosphonate derivatives in disease development. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Girona.

  • Moragrega C, Manceau C and Montesinos E (1998) Evaluation of drench treatments with phosphonate derivatives against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on pear under controlled environment conditions. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104: 171-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Pscheidt JW (2001) Pear-Pseudomonas blossom blast and dieback, an online guide to plant disease control. Oregon State University Extension. Available at http://plantdisease. orst.edu/disease.cfm. (2001, January 1)

  • Ridé M and Sutic D (1957) Un dessèchement des pousses de poirier d'origine bactérienne. Comptes Rendus Acadademie Agricicole Française 44: 384-387

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross IMM and Hatting MJ (1986) Pathogenic Pseudomonas spp. in stone fruit buds. Phytophylactica 18: 7-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheck HJ, Canfield ML, Pscheidt JW and Moore LW (1997) Rapid evaluation of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae with a lilac tissue culture bioassay and syringomicin DNA probes. Plant Disease 81: 905-910

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholberg PL and Quamme HA (1999) Dieback of pome fruit rootstocks caused by Pseudomonas syringae. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 3: 387-394

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JD (1972) Races of Pseudomonas pisi and sources of resistance in field and garden peas. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15: 441-447

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EE (1934) A bacterial canker of pear trees new to California. Phytopathology 24: 534-537

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimalajeewa DLS and Flett JD (1985) A study of populations of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on stone fruits in Victoria. Plant Pathology 34: 248-254

    Google Scholar 

  • Yessad S, Manceau C and Luisetti J (1992) A detached leaf assay to evaluate virulence and pathogenicity of strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on pear. Plant Disease 76: 370-373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moragrega, C., Llorente, I., Manceau, C. et al. Susceptibility of European pear cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae using immature fruit and detached leaf assays. European Journal of Plant Pathology 109, 319–326 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023574219069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023574219069

Navigation