Abstract
The classical theory of cognitive dissonance suggests that when two related cognitions are mutually inconsistent, one of them will change to restore consistency. However, Billig suggests that inconsistency is primarily an interactional problem between subjects and not a cognitive problem within a subject. In the current paper, we adopt Billig's rhetorical approach to inconsistency and study inconsistency as an interactional problem in the context of political rhetoric. More specifically, we use Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis to identify the discursive strategies the former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, used to cope with the inconsistency between his national ideology and his contradictory behavior during his short term in office.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Aronson, E., &Carlsmith, J. M. (1963).Effect of severity of threat on the valuation of forbidden behavior,Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,66,584-588.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. lOxford: Clarendon Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. lAustin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. lCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory, In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 220-262). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of face in everyday life. lNew York, NY: Doubleday.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. lWashington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Harre, R., & Gillett, G. (1995). The discursive mind. lLondon: Sage.
McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitude and attitude change, In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. lReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Netanyahu, B. (1986). Terrorism, how the west can win. lNew York, NY: Avon.
Netanyahu, B. (1993). A place among the nations. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Netanyahu, B. (1994). The alternative is autonomy, The Jerusalem Post, April 8, p. 4.
Netanyahu, B. (1995). Twin keys to peace, The Jerusalem Post, March 3, p. 5.
Neuman, Y., Bekeman, Z., & Kaplan, A. (2002). Rhetoric as the contextual manipulation of self and non-self, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 93-113
Scher, S. J., & Cooper, J. (1989). Motivational basis of dissonance: The singular role of behavioral consequences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 899-906
Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26, 685-695
Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 591-602
Tracy, K. (1995). Action-implicative discourse analysis, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 195-215
Tracy, K., & Anderson, D. L. (1999). Relational positioning strategies in police calls: A dilemma, Discourse Studies, 1, 201-225
Vygotsky, I. S. (1986). Thought and language. lCambridge, MA: MIT Press
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations. lOxford: Basil Blackwell
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neuman, Y., Tabak, I. Inconsistency as an Interactional Problem: A Lesson from Political Rhetoric. J Psycholinguist Res 32, 251–267 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023569501293
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023569501293