Skip to main content
Log in

Steam Reforming of Methanol Over Cu/CeO2 Catalysts Studied in Comparison with Cu/ZnO and Cu/Zn(Al)O Catalysts

  • Published:
Topics in Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of Ce1-xCuxO2-δ mixed oxides were synthesized using a co-precipitation method and tested as catalysts for the steam reforming of methanol. XRD patterns of the Ce1-xCuxO2-δ mixed oxides indicated that Cu2+ ions were dissolved in CeO2 lattices to form a solid solution by calcination at 773K when x < 0.2. A TPR (temperature-programmed reduction) investigation showed that the CeO2 promotes the reduction of the Cu2+ species. Two reduction peaks were observed in the TPR profiles, which suggested that there were two different Cu2+ species in the Ce1-xCuxO2-δ mixed oxides. The TPR peak at low temperature is attributed to the bulk Cu2+ species which dissolved into the CeO2 lattices, and the peak at high temperature is due to the CuO species dispersed on the surface of CeO2. The Ce1-xCuxO2-δ mixed oxides were reduced to form Cu/CeO2 catalysts for steam reforming of methanol, and were compared with Cu/ZnO, Cu/Zn(Al)O and Cu/AL2O3 catalysts. All the Cu-containing catalysts tested in this study showed high selectivities to CO2 (over 97%) and H2. A 3.8wt% Cu/CeO2 catalyst showed a conversion of 53.9% for the steam reforming of methanol at 513K (W/F = 4.9 g h mol-1), which was higher than that over Cu/ZnO (37.9%), Cu/Zn(Al)O (32.3%) and Cu/AL2O3 (11.2%) with the same Cu loading under the same reaction conditions. It is likely that the high activity of the Cu/CeO2 catalysts may be due to the highly dispersed Cu metal particles and the strong metalsupport interaction between the Cu metal and CeO2 support. Slow deactivations were observed over the 3.8wt% Cu/CeO2 catalyst at 493 and 513K. The activity of the deactivated catalysts can be regenerated by calcination in air at 773K followed by reduction in H2 at 673K, which indicated that a carbonaceous deposit on the catalyst surface caused the catalyst deactivation. Using the TPO (temperature-programmed oxidation) method, the amounts of coke on the 3.8wt% Cu/CeO2 catalyst were 0.8wt% at 493K and 1.7wt% at 513K after 24h on stream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C. Amphlett, M.J. Evans, R.A. Jones, R.F. Mann and R.D. Weir, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 59 (1981) 720.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Shen, S. Fujita, S. Matsumoto and N. Takezawa, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 124 (1997) 123.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.J. Jiang, D.L. Trimm and M.S. Wainwright, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 97 (1993) 145.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.A. Peppley, J.C. Amphlett, L.M. Kearns and R.F. Mann, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 179 (1999) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Breen and J.R.H. Ross, Catal. Today 51 (1999) 521.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Trovareli, C. Leitenburg and G. Dolcetti, Chemtech June (1997) 32.

  7. M. Pijolat, M. Prin and M. Soustelle, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91 (1995) 3941.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Fornasiero, G. Balducci, R.D. Monte, J. Kaspar, V. Sergo, G. Gubitosa, A. Ferrero and M. Graziani, J. Catal. 164 (1996) 173.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fan and K. Fujimoto, J. Catal. 172 (1997) 238.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Liu and M.F. Stephanopoulos, J. Catal. 153 (1995) 304.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.M. Arias, R. Cataluna, J.C. Conesa and J. Soria, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 809.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Hocevar, J. Batista and J. Levec, J. Catal. 184 (1999) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Rodriguez, T. Jirsak, A. Freitag, J.C. Hanson, J.Z. Larese and S. Chaturredi, Catal. Lett. 62 (1999) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Velu, K. Suzuki and T. Osaki, Catal. Lett. 62 (1999) 159.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.F. Scholten and A. van Montfoort, J. Catal. 1 (1962) 85.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Inui, M. Suehiro and Y. Takegami, J. Japan Petrol. Inst. 25 (1982) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.J. Kokes and P.H. Emmett, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82 (1960) 1037.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.A. Dean, (ed.), in: Lang's Handbook of Chemistry, 23rd edn (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.E. Goodby and J.E. Pemberton, Appl. Spectrosc. 42 (1988) 754.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.R. Sheffer and T.S. King, J. Catal. 116 (1989) 488.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Apai, J.R. Monnier and D.R. Preuss, J. Catal. 98 (1986) 563.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Z. Xu, Z. Qian, L. Mao, K. Tanabe and H. Hattori, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 64 (1991) 1658.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Fujitani, M. Saito, Y. Kanai, T. Kakumoto and T. Watanabe, Catal. Lett. 25 (1994) 271.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.O. Idem and N.N. Bakhshi, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33 (1994) 2056.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Shiozaki, A.G. Anderson, T. Hayakawa, K. Suzuki, M. Shimizu and K. Takehira, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 93 (1997) 3235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Hayakawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Hayakawa, T., Tsunoda, T. et al. Steam Reforming of Methanol Over Cu/CeO2 Catalysts Studied in Comparison with Cu/ZnO and Cu/Zn(Al)O Catalysts. Topics in Catalysis 22, 205–213 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023519802373

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023519802373

Navigation