Personal ads are a potentially rich source of information on relationships, particularly mating strategies. Most research on personal ads has been limited to content analyses of naturally occurring ads. In this study, four “female seeking male” ads were placed on two large Internet bulletin boards specializing in such ads. The four ads, differing primarily in a few key words representing the manipulated independent variable, garnered over 500 e-mail responses in 6 weeks. Contrary to prior research and to our prediction, the most popular ad was one in which the woman described herself as “financially independent...; successful [and] ambitious,” producing over 50% more responses than the next most popular ad, one in which the woman described herself as “lovely...; very attractive and slim.” A content analysis of responses to the ads revealed that information provided varied as a function of the ad they were answering.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A., & Bernath, L. (1997). Resources, attractiveness, family commitment: Reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology, 103, 681699.
Baize, H. R., & Schroeder, J. E. (1995). Personality and mate selection in personal ads: Evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10, 517536.
Binik, Y. M. (2001). Sexuality and the Internet: Lots of hyp(otheses)—only a little data. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 281282.
Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 4751.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate selection: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 149.
Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559570.
Cicerello, A., & Sheehan, E. P. (1995). Personal advertisements: A content analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 751756.
Davis, S. (1990). Men as success objects and women as sex objects: A study of personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 23, 4350.
Deaux, K., & Hanna, R. (1984). Courtship in the personals column: The influence of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 11, 363375.
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981993
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125139.
Goode, E. (1996). Gender and courtship entitlement: Responses to personal ads. Sex Roles, 34, 144169.
Greenlees, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5972.
Harrison, A. A., & Saeed, L. (1977). Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 257264.
Koestner, R., & Wheeler, L. (1988). Selfpresentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 149160.
Lance, L. M. (1998). Gender differences in heterosexual dating: A content analysis of personal ads. Journal of Men's Studies, 6, 297305.
Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349357.
Lynn, M., & Bolig, R. (1985). Personal advertisements: Sources of data about relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 377383.
Matthews, T. D. (1999). A WorldWide Webbased research project. The Teaching of Psychology, 26, 227230.
Okami, P., & Shakelford, T. K. (2001). Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 186241.
Sitton, S., & Blanchard, S. (1995). Men's preferences in romantic partners: Obesity vs addiction. Psychological Reports, 77, 11851186.
Smith, J. E., Waldorf, V. A., & Trembath, D. L. (1990). “Single white male looking for thin, very attractive...” Sex Roles, 23, 675685.
Symons, D. (1979). Evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Symons, D. (1990). Adaptiveness and adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 427444.
Thiessen, D., Young, R. K., & Burroughs, R. (1993). Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 209229.
Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mateselection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241253.
Townsend, J. M., & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 149164.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 115124.
About this article
Cite this article
Strassberg, D.S., Holty, S. An Experimental Study of Women's Internet Personal Ads. Arch Sex Behav 32, 253–260 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023465601718
- personal ads
- Internet dating
- interpersonal attraction