Skip to main content
Log in

Neuron Activity in the Pedunculopontine Nucleus during an Operant Conditioned Defensive Reflex

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The activity of 109 neurons in the compact and diffuse zones of the pedunculopontine nucleus was studied in freely mobile rabbits during the acquisition and performance of a defensive operant conditioned reflex. A total of 47% of the neurons recorded showed responsive properties to the conditioned stimulus, which is evidence for the involvement of the pedunculopontine nucleus in operant learning. A significant predominance of excitatory conditioned reflex responses to the conditioned stimulus was demonstrated, showing that the nature of the influence of the pedunculopontine nucleus on projection structures during learning is mostly excitatory. The main patterns of cell responses to the conditioned stimulus were identified, these reflecting the nature of the influence of the conditioned stimulus on neuron activity, the structure of the behavioral act, and the properties of the reinforcement, suggesting a relationship between the pedunculopontine nucleus and the processes of attention, motor learning, and reinforcement. A significant decrease in the reactivity of neurons in the pedunculopontine nucleus to the conditioned stimulus as a result of specialization due to learning was demonstrated. Differences in the associative reactive properties of the compact and diffuse zones of the pedunculopontine nucleus to the conditioned stimulus were identified, which is evidence for the functional heterogeneity of this formation and suggests a leading role for the cholinergic compact zone in operant defensive behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. K. A. Bykhovskii and V. I. Maiorov, “A discriminator for extracting spikes of defined shape under visual control,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 37, No. 4, 785 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. Konorskii, The Integrative Activity of the Brain [in Russian], Mir, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Korshunov, “A compact micromanipulator for chronic extracellular recording of neuron activity in fixed and freely mobile animals,” Biol. Nauki, No. 5, 103 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. I. Kotlyar, V. I. Maiorov, N. O. Timofeeva, and V. V. Shul'govskii, Neuronal Organization of Conditioned Reflex Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. I. Kotlyar, N. O. Timofeeva, and I. I. Semikopnaya, “Dynamics of hippocampal neuron activity during formation of a conditioned avoidance reflex,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 31, No. 3, 521 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. I. Kotlyar, N. O. Timofeeva, and L. D. Popovich, “Conditioned reflex switching: neurophysiological mechanisms,” Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Ser. 16, Biologiya, No. 2, 3 (1985).

  7. R. Naatanen, Attention and Brain Function [in Russian], Moscow State University Press, Moscow (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Bechara and D. Van der Kooy, “A single brainstem substrate mediates the motivational effects of both opiates and food in nondeprived but not in deprived rats,” Behav. Neurosci., 106, 351 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.E. Brauth and J. Olds, “Midbrain unit activity during classical conditioning,” Brain Res., 134, 73 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Conde, J. F. Dormont, and D. Farin, “The role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in relation to conditioned motor performance in the cat. II. Effects of reversible inactivation by intracerebral microinjections,” Exptl. Brain Res., 121, No. 4, 411 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Dellu, W. Mayo, J. Cherkaoni, et al., “Learning disturbances following excitotoxic lesion of cholinergic pedunculopontine nucleus in the rat,” Brain Res., 544, 126 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. F. Dormont, H. Conde, and D. Farin, “The role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in relation to conditioned motor performance in the cat. I. Context-dependent and reinforcementrelated single unit activity,” Exptl. Brain Res., 121, No. 4, 401 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Fifkova and J. Marsala, “Stereotaxic atlases for the cat, rabbit and rat,” in: Electrophysiological Methods in Biological Research, J. Bures, M. Petran, and J. Zachar (eds.), Academic Press, New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Florio, A. Capozzo, E. Puglielly, et al., “The function of the pedunculopontine nucleus in the preparation and execution of an externally-cued bar pressing task in the rat,” Behav. Brain Res., 104, 95 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Gracia-Rill, “The pedunculopontine nucleus,” Progr. Neurobiol., 36, 363 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Inglis, J. S. Dunbar, and P. Winn, “Outflow from the nucleus accumbens to the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: dissociation between locomotor and the acquisition of the responding for conditioned reinforcement stimulated by d-amphetamine,” Neurosci., 62, 51 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Kock, “The neurobiology of startle,” Progr. Neurobiol., 59, 107 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Lepore and K. B. Franclin, “N-methyl-D-aspartate lesion of the pedunculopontine nucleus blocks acquisition and impairs maintenance of responding reinforced with brain stimulation,” J. Neurosci., 71, 147 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Matsumara, K. Watanabe, and Ch. Ohye, “Single-unit activity in the primate nucleus tegmenti pedunculopontinus related to voluntary arm movement,” Neurosci. Res., 28, No. 2, 155 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. M. Mesulam, E. J. Mufson, B. H. Wainer, and A. J. Levey, “Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: an overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1-Ch6),” Neurosci., 10, 1185 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Moruzzi and H. W. Magoun, “Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1, 459 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. P. Pascoe and B. S. Kapp, “Electrophysiology of the dorsolateral mesopontine reticular formation during Pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit,” J. Neurosci., 54, No. 3, 753 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. J. Olds and J. Olds, “Unit activity: motivation-dependent responses from midbrain neurons,” Science, 165, 1269 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Schultz, “Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons,” J. Neurophysiol., 80, 1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Steckler, W. Inglis, Ph. Winn, and A. Sahgal, “The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: a role in cognitive processes?” Brain Res. Rev., 19, No. 3, 298 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. F. Thompson, T. W. Berger, C. F. Cegavske, et al, “The search for the engram,” Amer. Psychol., 31, No. 2, 209 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivlieva, N.Y., Timofeeva, N.O. Neuron Activity in the Pedunculopontine Nucleus during an Operant Conditioned Defensive Reflex. Neurosci Behav Physiol 33, 499–506 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023419418869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023419418869

Keywords

Navigation