Skip to main content
Log in

Probability Transformations In The Study Of Behavior Toward Risk

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probability transformation functions were introduced into modelsof behavior toward risk to allow them to accommodate violations of the expected utility hypothesis.This paper examines the shape of the probability transformation function, its interpretation asoptimism or pessimism, and how the ranking of outcomes becomes important when probability transformationsare used. It also explores two behavioral implications: the overweighting of unlikely, extremeoutcomes, and intertia around certainty. Finally, the rationality of transforming the probabilitydistribution is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abdellaoui, M.: 2000, 'Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions', Management Science 46, 1497–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J.: 1974, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battalio, R. C., J. H. Kagel, and K. Jiranyakul: 1990, 'Testing between Alternative Models of Choice under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S.: 1968, 'Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach', Journal of Political Economy 76, 169–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, M.: 1998, 'Tax Evasion and Orders of Risk Aversion', Journal of Public Economics 67, 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt, H. and J. L. Pinto: 2000, 'A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis', Management Science 46, 1485–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F.: 1989, 'An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 61–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. and T. H. Ho: 1994, 'Violations of the betweenness Axiom and Nonlinearity in Probability', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8, 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, J.: 1989, 'Three Variants on the Allais Example', American Economic Review 79, 392–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. and G. Wu: 1999, 'On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function', Cognitive Psychology 38, 129–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D. M. and C. R. Plott: 1979, 'Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon', American Economic Review 69, 623–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J. and W. R. Russell: 1969, 'Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects', American Economic Review 59, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa, J.: 1977, 'Risk, Probabilities, and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility', Journal of Political Economy 85, 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W. T., K. Krause, and L. Vesterlund: 2002, 'Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses', Experimental Economics 5, 53–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, J. C., H. C. Kunreuther, and P. J. H. Schoemaker: 1982, 'Sources of Bias in Assessment Procedures for Utility Functions', Management Science 38, 936–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk', Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmarker, U. S.: 1978, 'Subjectively Weighted Utility: A Descriptive Extension of the Expected Utility Model', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 21, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. and P. Slovic: 1971, 'Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions', Journal of Experimental Psychology 89, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, W. and J. Stowe: 2002, 'A Further Examination of Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameterizations', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W.: 1964, 'Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large', Econometrica 32, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D.: 1998, 'The Probability Weighting Function', Econometrica 66, 497–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J.: 1982, 'A Theory of Anticipated Utility', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M.: 1974, 'Searching for the Lowest Price when the Distribution of Prices is Unknown', Journal of Political Economy 82, 689–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D.: 1989, 'Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity', Econometrica 57, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. and A. Spivak: 1990, 'First Order versus Second Order Risk Aversion', Journal of Economic Theory 51, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1981, 'The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice', Science 211, 453–458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1992, 'Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., P. Slovic, and D. Kahneman: 1990, 'The Causes of Preference Reversal', American Economic Review 80, 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G. and R. Gonzalez: 1996, 'Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function', Management Science 42, 1676–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. E.: 1987, 'The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk', Econometrica 55, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neilson, W.S. Probability Transformations In The Study Of Behavior Toward Risk. Synthese 135, 171–192 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023408906789

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023408906789

Keywords

Navigation