Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Approach of Targeted Ablation of Mammary Carcinoma Cells Through Luteinizing Hormone Receptors using Hecate-CGβ Conjugate

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that human and animal mammary gland carcinoma cell line express luteinizing hormone receptors (LHRs). We have examined the cytotoxic effect of Hecate-CGβ conjugate, that is, fusion of a lytic peptide (Hecate) and a 15-amino acid fragment of the CGβ-chain in vitro. To test the hypothesis that the Hecate-CGβ conjugate selectively abolishes cells possessing LHR, estrogen dependent and independent human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7; MDA-MB-231) and a mouse Leydig tumor cell line (BLT-1) were treated in vitro with Hecate-CGβ conjugate and Hecate alone. Cytotoxic effects of the Hecate-CGβ conjugate and the Hecate alone was measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release immediately after treatment. We observed that the Hecate-CGβ conjugate selectively, in dose-dependent manner destroys cells possessing LHR in lower concentrations of preparate comparing to the Hecate alone and that the cytotoxic effect is strongly correlated with the number of LHR. Using Western blot analysis we characterized the LHR on membranes of MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 and BLT-1 tumor cell lines. In addition, we showed the evaluation of inhibition potential of the Hecate-CGβ conjugate to LHR. At a concentration of 33 µM the conjugate inhibited (50%; IC50) the binding of CG to LHR.

We suggest further development of this novel approach for the treatment of breast cancer by the Hecate-CGβ for in vivo trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM: ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 9: 624–628, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  2. Santen RJ, Manni A, Harvey H, Redmond C: Endocrine treatment of breast cancer in women. Endocr Rev 11: 221–265, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saphner T, Tormey DC, Gray R: Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy. J Clin Oncol 14: 2738–2746, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bange J, Zwick E, Ullrich A: Molecular targets for breast cancer therapy and prevention. Nat Med 7: 548–552, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  5. Magrath T: Targeted approaches to cancer therapy. Int J Cancer 56: 163–166, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pierce JG, Parsons TF: Glycoprotein hormones: structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 50: 466–495, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ziecik AJ, Stanchev PD, Tilton JE: Evidence for the presence of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropinbinding sites in the porcine uterus. Endocrinology 119: 1159–1163, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rao CV: The beginning of a new era in reproductive biology and medicine: expression of low levels of functional luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptors in nongonadal tissue. J Physiol Pharmacol 47: 41–53, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lojun S, Bao S, Lei ZM, Rao CV: Presence of functional luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin (CG) receptors in human breast cell lines: implications supporting the premise that CG protects women against breast cancer. Biol Reprod 57: 1202–1210, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meduri G, Charnaux N, Loosfelt H, Jolivet A, Spyratos F, Brailly S, Milgrom E: Luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptors in breast cancer. Cancer Res 1: 857–864, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tao YX, Lei ZM, Rao CV: The presence of luteinizing hormone/ human chorionic gonadotropin receptors in lactating rat mammary glands. Life Sci 60: 1297–1303, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarado MV, Alvarado NE, Russo J, Russo IH: Human chorionic gonadotropin inhibits proliferation and induces expression of inhibin in human breast epithelial cells in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 30: 4–8, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Russo IH, Koszalka M, Russo J: Human chorionic gonadotropin and rat mammary cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 1: 1286–1289, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russo IH, Koszalka M, Russo J: Comparative study of the influence of pregnancy and hormonal treatment on mammary carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 64: 481–484, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrlich P: The relationship existing between chemical constitution, distribution, and pharmacological action. In: Himmelweite F, Marquardt M, Dale H (eds) The Collected Papers of Paul Ehrlich. Vol. 1, Pergamon, Elmsford, New York: 1956, pp 596–618

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hertler AA, Frankel AE: Immunotoxins: a clinical review of their use in the treatment of malignancies. J Clin Oncol 7: 1932–1942, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pastan I, FitzGerald D: Recombinant toxins for cancer treatment. Science 22: 1173–1177, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. FitzGerald D, Pastan I: Targeted toxin therapy for the treatment of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 4: 1455–1463, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh V, Sairam MR, Bhargavi GN, Akhras RG: Hormonotoxins. Preparation and characterization of ovine luteinizing hormone-gelonin conjugate. J Biol Chem 25: 3089–3095, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boman HG: Antibacterial peptides: key components needed in immunity. Cell 65: 205–207, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zasloff M: Antibiotic peptides as mediators of innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 4: 3–7, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JY, Boman A, Sun CX, Andersson M, Jornvall H, Mutt V, Boman HG: Antibacterial peptides from pig intestine: isolation of a mammalian cecropin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 9159–9162, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dempsey CE: The actions of melittin on membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 7: 143–161, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weaver AJ, Kemple MD, Brauner JW, Mendelsohn R, Prendergast FG: Fluorescence, CD, attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FTIR, and 13C NMR characterization of the structure and dynamics of synthetic melittin and melittin analogues in lipid environments. Biochemistry 11: 1301–1313, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tosteson MT, Alvarez O, Hubbell W, Bieganski RM, Attenbach C, Caporales LH, Levy JJ, Nutt RF, Rosenblatt M, Tosteson DC: Primary structure of peptides and ion channels. role of amino acid side chains in voltage gating of melittin channels. Biophys J 58: 1367–1375, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henk WG, Todd WJ, Enright FM, Mitchell PS: The morphological effects of two antimicrobial peptides, hecate-1 and melittin on Escherichia coli. Scanning Microsc 9: 501–507, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morbeck DE, Roche PC, Keutmann HT, McCormick DJ: A receptor binding site identified in the region 81-95 of the betasubunit of human luteinizing hormone (LH) and chorionic gonadotropin (CG). Mol Cell Endocrinol 97: 173–181, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leuschner C, Enright FM, Melrose PA, Hansel W: Targeted destruction of androgen-sensitive and-insensitive prostate cancer cells and xenografts through luteinizing hormone receptors. Prostate 46: 116–125, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kananen K, Markkula M, El-Hefnawy T, Zhang FP, Paukku T, Su JG, Hsueh AJ, Huhtaniemi I: The mouse inhibin alphasubunit promoter directs SV40 T-antigen to Leydig cells in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol 119: 135–146, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Faar AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275: 1951

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ferguson KM, Hayes MM, Jeffcoate SL: In: Hunter WM, Corrie JE (eds) Preparation of tracer LH and FSH for multicenter use, Immunoassays for Clinical Chemistry, Churchil-Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1983, pp 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Daly M, Wieand S, Tan-Chiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N: Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 16: 1371–1388, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gail MH, Costantino JP, Bryant J, Croyle R, Freedman L, Helzlsouer K, Vogel V: Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 3: 1829–1846, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  34. Russo IH, Koszalka M, Gimotty PA, Russo J: Protective effect of chorionic gonadotropin on DMBA-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 62: 243–247, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  35. MacMahon B, Cole P, Lin TM, Lowe CR, Mirra AP, Ravnihar B, Salber EJ, Valaoras VG, Yuasa S: Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull World Health Organ 43: 209–221, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kelsey JL, Gammon MD: Epidemiology of breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 12: 228–240, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bigsby RM, Caperell-Grant A, Madhukar BV: Xenobiotics released from fat during fasting produce estrogenic effects in ovariectomized mice. Cancer Res 1: 865–869, 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bodek, G., Ahmed Rahman, N., Zaleska, M. et al. A Novel Approach of Targeted Ablation of Mammary Carcinoma Cells Through Luteinizing Hormone Receptors using Hecate-CGβ Conjugate. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79, 1–10 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023351819956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023351819956

Navigation