Abstract
An urban school district is undergoing a process of change as proposed in the educational reform agenda introduced by a new superintendent. This qualitative research study provides insight into the concerns of some elementary school principals in the district during the initial phase of the reform as they deal with the transition from a historically bureaucratic to a decentralized system, attempt to make sense of their dilemmas, and seek new ways of managing in a restructured environment. Major issues revealed in this study indicate there are some basic considerations to be addressed in initiating a districtwide process of change and eliciting site administrator support (i.e., understanding the dilemmas of managing in a different power structure, providing opportunities for sufficient input, and devising a sound professional development program for principals to assist in reconceptualizing administrative roles). Implications suggest that it is essential for top school executives initiating change processes to develop good communication processes and gain an understanding of the cultural norms of a school system to gain the commitment of school principals and school constituencies. This study, which contributes to the empirically based literature on school reform, also illustrates that initiation of structural changes needs to be clearly related to the ultimate goal of improving student achievement so that all school constituencies understand the focus of the reform agenda. Consideration of these issues in devising plans for educational change may enhance actualization of desired outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baldridge, J. V. (1983). Rules for a Machiavellian change agent: Transforming the entrenched professional organization. In J. V. Baldridge and T. E. Deal (Eds.), The Dynamics of Educational Change in Education (pp.209–219). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Baldridge, J. V., and Deal, T. E. (Eds.) (1983). The Dynamics of Educational Change in Education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Bunker, B. (1989). Leading school systems through transitions. In J. J. Mauriel (Ed.), Strategic Leadership for Schools: Creating and Sustaining Productive Change (pp.261–286). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cunningham, W. G., Gresso, D. W. (1993). Cultural Leadership: The Culture of Excellence in Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Elmore, R., Peterson, P., and McCarthey, S. J. (1996). Restructuring in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning, and School Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (1992). Successful School Improvement: The Implementation Perspective and Beyond. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Fullan, M., Stielgebauer, S. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., and Hausman, C. (1992, August). Restructuring schools: Principals' perceptions of fundamental educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly 28(3): 330–349.
Hatry, H. P., Morley, E., Ashford, B., and Wyatt, T. M. (1993). Implementing School-Based Management: Insights into Decentralization from Science and Mathematics Departments. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Hess, G. A., Jr. (Ed.) (1991). School Restructuring, Chicago Style. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Hornbeck, D. W. (1994). Children Achieving: Action Design 1995–1999. Philadelphia: School District of Philadelphia.
Johnson, S. M. (1990). Redesigning teachers' work. In R. F. Elmore et al. (Eds.), Restructuring Schools: The Next Generation of Educational Reform (pp. 125–151). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leithwood, K., Begley, P. T., and Cousins, J. B. (1992). Developing Expert Leadership for Future Schools. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Lichtenstein, G., McLaughlin, M. W., and Knudsen, J. (1992). Teacher empowerment and professional knowledge. In A. Lieberman, and K. J. Rehage (Eds.), The Changing Contexts of Teaching: Ninety-first Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part I) (pp.11–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindgren, H. C. (1959). Psychology of Personal and Social Adjustment (2nd ed.). New York: American Book Company.
Malen, B., Ogawa R. T., and Kranz, J. (1990, February). Site-based management: Unfulfilled promises. School Administrator 4(2): 30, 32, 53–56, 59.
Mauriel, J. J. (1989). Strategic Leadership for Schools: Creating and Sustaining Productive Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mezzacappa, D. (1995, February 12). The two key players in school reform bid. Inquirer, pp. C1, 2.
Murphy, J. and Louis, K. S. (1994). Reshaping the Principalship: Insights from Transformational Reform Efforts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Newall, C. A. (1978). Human Behavior in Educational Administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Raywid, M. A. (1990). Rethinking school governance. In Richard F. Elmore et al. (Eds.), Restructuring Schools: The Next Generation of Educational Reform (pp. 152–206). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Scheurich, J. J. and Imber, M. (1991, August). Educational reforms can reproduce societal inequities: A case study. Educational Administration Quarterly 27(3): 297–320.
Useem, E. L. (1994). Renewing Schools: A Report on the Cluster Initiative in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Paths/Prism.
Weiss, C. H. (1993, Fall). Shared decision making about what? A comparison of schools with and without teacher participation. Teachers College Record 95(1): 69–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, A.M. A Response to Restructuring: The Dilemmas of School Principals in a Process of Change. The Urban Review 30, 309–332 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298602477
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298602477