Skip to main content
Log in

Creating Accessible Queer Community: Intersections and Fractures with Dis/Ability Praxis

  • Published:
International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies

Abstract

This article explores the intersections and fractures that disability theory and activism present to queer community. The authors begin by drawing upon a multiple axis approach from feminist theory, then discuss the problem of defining “disability” and “queer.” They then explore the intersections and fractures of these identities and theories, hoping to raise awareness among queer activists and scholars and introduce them to conceptual and practical tools. In particular, disability studies offers a way to reconceptualize and ground theory and practice in the “messiness” of real bodies and to make visible the mythic “normate” against which cultural Others are defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Atkins, D. (1998). Introduction: Looking queer. In D. Atkins (Ed.), Looking queer: Body image and identity among lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender communities, (pp. xxix-li). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. (1996). Passing. In S. Tremain (Ed.), Pushing the limits, (pp. 166-167). Canada: Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, A. (1993). Deemed sexless. Utne Reader, March/April, 107-108.

  • Fries, K. (1998). The imperfections of beauty: On being gay and disabled. In D. Atkins (Ed.), Looking queer: Body image and identity among lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender communities, (pp. 315-322). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griscom, J. L. (1992). The case of Sharon Kowalski and Karen Thompson: Ableism, heterosexism, and sexism. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the U.S.: An integrated study, (pp. 215-224). New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. L. (1996). “... and I will have sex again.” In S. Tremain (Ed.), Pushing the limits. (pp. 72-76). Canada: Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1995). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In A. Kesselman, et al. (Eds.), Women, images, and realities: A multicultural anthology, (pp. 267-272). Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, M. K. (1996). Full day. In S. Tremain (Ed.), Pushing the limits, (pp. 70-71). Canada: Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. F. (1983). Voices from the shadows: Women with disabilities speak out. Toronto: Women's Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1998, July 27). An ad blitz seeks to convert gays. Newsweek, 27.

  • Mitchell, D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (1997). Introduction: Disability studies and the double bind of representation. In D. Mitchell and S. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 1-31). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, P. (1998). Pioneering field of disability studies challenges established approaches and attitudes. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan. 23, A15-A16.

  • Sandoval, C. (1984). Dis-illusionment and the poetry of the future: The making of oppositional consciousness. Ph.D. Qualifying Essay, University of California at Santa Cruz.

  • Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. P. (1994). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorile, M.. (1997). Life outside. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, S. (Ed.) (1996). Pushing the limits: Disabled dykes produce culture. Canada: Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troiden, R. R. (1985). Self, self-concept, identity, and homosexual identity: Constructs in need of definition and differentiation. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(3/4), 97-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia, 4(2), 104-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia, A. N. (1995). Feminist media studies in a global setting: Beyond binary contradictions and into multicultural spectrums. In A. N. Valdivia (Ed.), Feminism, multiculturalism, and the media: Global diversities. (pp. 7-29). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkins, D., Marston, C. Creating Accessible Queer Community: Intersections and Fractures with Dis/Ability Praxis. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 4, 3–21 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298223105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298223105

Navigation