Abstract
This article uses urban middle school student's interviews to describe the instructional differences they faced each day and the effects of these differences on what they learned. Data from a cohort of nearly 200 students over two years revealed common definitions of how they wanted their teachers to act and the kinds of classroom activities they wanted to be engaged in. But more important, their observations revealed stark differences in their actual experiences. Too few students experienced the quality instruction they desired. Students praised teachers who were willing to help, were strict but nice, and were able to explain. They also wanted instructional settings where they were challenged by meaningful projects and experiments, worked more interdependently with their peers, and combined work with fun. We conclude from these student observations that reform efforts will be more successful in settings that nurture, maintain, and reinforce classrooms like those so aptly described by students and promote the spread of these classrooms by taking advantage of the talents of exemplary staff within buildings (i.e., “scaling within”).
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 1–26.
Fullan, M., with Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gandara, P. (Ed.) (In press). The Dimension of Time and the Challenge of School Reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gold, E., and Voss, C. (1996). Making Children Larger and Cracks Smaller: The Role of Participatory Evaluation in School Restructuring. Philadelphia: Research for Action.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corbett, H.D., Wilson, B.L. Scaling Within Rather Than Scaling Up: Implications from Students' Experiences in Reforming Urban Middle Schools. The Urban Review 30, 261–293 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023294501568
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023294501568