Skip to main content
Log in

Smoothing and Change Point Detection for Gamma Ray Count Data

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gamma ray detectors are used to measure the natural radioactivity of rocks. For a number of boreholes drilled at a site the gamma ray detector is lowered into each borehole and counts of gamma ray emissions at different depths are recorded as the instrument is gradually raised to ground level. The profile of gamma counts can be informative about the geology at each location. The raw count data are highly variable, and in this paper we describe the use of adaptive smoothing techniques and change point models in order to identify changes in the geology based on the gamma logs. We formulate all our models for the data in the framework of the class of generalized linear models, and describe computational methods for Bayesian inference and model selection for generalized linear models that improve on existing techniques. Application is made to gamma ray data from the Castelreagh Waste Management Centre which served as a hazardous waste disposal facility for the Sydney region between March 1974 and August 1998. Understanding the geological structure of this site is important for further modelling the transport of pollutants beneath the waste disposal area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Biller, C., 2000, Adaptive Bayesian regression splines in semiparametric generalized linear models: J. Comput. Graph. Stat., v. 9, no. 1, p. 122-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., 1998, Estimation and comparison of multiple change point models: J. Econometrics, v. 86, no. 2, p. 221-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., and Greenberg, E., 1995, Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm: Am. Statistician, v. 49, no. 4, p. 327-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, A. C., and McCann, D. M., 2000, The use of the natural gamma logs in engineering geological investigations: Eng. Geol., v. 55, no. 4, p. 313-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaportas, P., Forster, J., and Ntzoufras, I., 2002, On Bayesian model and variable selection using MCMC: Stat. Comput., v. 12, no. 1, p. 27-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. G. T., Mallick, B. K., and Smith, A. F. M., 1998, Automatic Bayesian curve fitting: J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, v. 60, no. 2, p. 333-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Matteo, I., Genovese, C. R., and Kass, R. E., 2001, Bayesian curve fitting with free-knot splines: Biometrika, v. 88, no. 4, p. 1055-1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. V., 1987, Well logging for earth scientists: Elsevier, New York, 532 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamerman, D., 1997, Sampling from the posterior distribution in generalized linear mixed models: Stat. Comput., v. 7, no. 1, p. 57-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B., 1995, Bayesian data analysis: Chapman and Hall, London, 526 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J., 1995, Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination: Biometrika, v. 82, no. 4, p. 711-732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J., and Silverman, B. W., 1994, Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: A roughness penalty approach: Chapman and Hally, London, 182 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeting, J., Madigan, D., Raftery, A., and Volinsky, C., 1999, Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial (with discussion): Stat. Sci., v. 14, no. 4, p. 382-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R. E., and Wasserman, L., 1995, A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwartz criterion: J. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 90, no. 3, p. 928-934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, R., Smith, M., and Chan, D., 2001, Nonparametric regression using linear combinations of basis functions: Stat. Comput., v. 11, no. 4, p. 313-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A., 1989, Generalized linear models, 2nd edn.: Chapman and Hall, London, 511 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntzoufras, I., Dellaportas, P., and Forster, J., 2003, Bayesian variable and link determination for generalised linaer models: J. Stat. Plann. Inference, v. 111, no. 1/2, p. 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • ó Runaidh, J. J. K., and Fitzgerald, W. J., 1996, Numerical Bayesian methods applied to signal processing: Springer, New York, 244 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, O., Baldwin, J., and Querin, J., 1980, Theory, interpretation, and practical application of natural gamma-ray spectroscopy: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Transactions Paper Q, 30p.

  • Smith, M., and Kohn, R., 1996, Nonparametric regression using Bayesian variable selection: J. Econometrics, v. 75, no. 2, p. 317-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. A., 1994, Bayesian retrospective multiple changepoint identification: Appl. Stat., v. 43, no. 1, p. 1159-1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsang, D., 1995, Environmental geophysics: A practical guide: Springer-Verlag, New York, 173 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M., 1985, Generalized linear models: Outlier accommodation, scale parameters and prior distributions, in Bernardo, J. M., Degroot, M. H., Smith, A. F. M., and Lindley, D. V., eds., Bayesian statistics 2: Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 531-538.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leonte, D., Nott, D.J. & Dunsmuir, W.T.M. Smoothing and Change Point Detection for Gamma Ray Count Data. Mathematical Geology 35, 175–194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023287521958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023287521958

Navigation