Advertisement

Queers and Crips: Parallel Identity Development Processes for Persons with Nonvisible Disabilities and Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Persons

  • Elizabeth P. Cramer
  • Stephen F. Gilson
Article
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

Traditional models of identity development are inadequate when applied to lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons and persons with disabilities. The identity development and life experiences of persons with disabilities and LGB persons are similar in many respects including being raised/socialized by persons who are not a part of that group, and being educated to conform to the standards of behavior and appearance of the dominant culture. This article describes and critiques four models of identity development as applied to LGB persons and persons with nonvisible disabilities: stage/linear, issues/milestone experiences, social constructionist, and interactional. The authors propose an interactional identity development model for persons with disabilities and LGB persons that incorporates the significance of bio-psycho-social-cultural contexts, the influence of multiple identities, the fluidity of identity formation, and the importance of language.

identity development disability queer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. Asch, A., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (1988). Issue: Moving disability beyond “stigma” [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1).Google Scholar
  3. Bayer, R. (1981). Homosexuality and American psychiatry: The politics of diagnosis. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, R. M. (1990). Passing: Impact on quality of same-sex couple relationships. Social Work, 35(4), 328-332.Google Scholar
  5. Berzon, B. (Ed.). (1992). Positively gay: New approaches to gay and lesbian life. Berkeley: Celestial Arts.Google Scholar
  6. Bullough, B., Bullough, V., & Elias, J. (Eds.). (1997) Gender blending. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (1988). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 219-235.Google Scholar
  9. Cass, V. C. (1984a). Homosexual identity: A concept in need of definition. Journal of Homosexuality, 9(2/3), 105-126.Google Scholar
  10. Cass, V. C. (1984b). Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical model. Journal of Sex Research, 20(2), 143-167.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Cramer, E. P. (1996, June). Feminist perspectives on lesbian identities. Paper presented at the National Women's Studies Association conference. Saratoga Springs, NY.Google Scholar
  13. de Monteflores, C., & Schultz, S. S. (1978). Coming out: Similarities and differences for lesbians and gay men. Journal of Social Issues, 34(3), 59-72.Google Scholar
  14. D'Emilio, J., & Freedman, E. B. (1988). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  15. Eliason, M. J. (1996). An inclusive model of lesbian identity assumption. Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity, 1(1), 3-19.Google Scholar
  16. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Ewen, R. B. (1980). An introduction to theories of personality. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Faderman, L. (1984). The “new gay” lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(3/4), 85-95.Google Scholar
  19. Faderman, L. (1986). Love between women in 1928: Why progressivism is not always progress. Journal of Homosexuality, 12(3/4), 23-42.Google Scholar
  20. Faderman, L. (1991). Odd girls and twilight lovers: A history of lesbian life in twentieth-century America. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  21. Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-430, 102 Stat. 1619 (1988).Google Scholar
  22. Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to RuPaul. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gill, C. (1997). Four types of integration in disability identity development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9(1), 39-46.Google Scholar
  24. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gilson, S. F., Tusler, A., & Gill, C. (1997). Ethnographic research in disability identity: Self-determination and community. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9(1), 7-17.Google Scholar
  26. Hahn, H. (1993). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on Disability (pp. 37-42). (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.Google Scholar
  27. Hahn, H. (1997). An agenda for citizens with disabilities: Pursuing identity and empowerment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9(1), 31-37.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, W. S., Freedle, R., & Cross, W. E., Jr. (1972). Stages in the development of black identity. Iowa City: Research and Development Division, American College Testing Program.Google Scholar
  29. Hecht, A., & Gutman, V. (1997, August). Identity formation and self-esteem in deaf lesbians. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association conference.Google Scholar
  30. Hillyer, B. (1996). Teaching feminist lesbian disability studies. In B. Zimmerman and T. A. H. McNaron (Eds.), The new lesbian studies (pp. 115-119). New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  31. hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  32. Klein, F. (1978). The bisexual option: A concept of one-hundred percent intimacy. New York: Arbor House.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, L. (1984). The coming out process for lesbians. Integrating a stable identity. Social Work, 29(5), 464-469.Google Scholar
  34. Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  35. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Logan, S. M. L. (1990). Diversity among Black families: Assessing structure and function. In S. M. L. Logan, E.M. Freeman, & R. G. McRoy (Eds.). Social work practice with Black families: A culturally specific perspective (pp. 73-96). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. McDonald, G. J. (1982). Individual differences in the coming out process for gay men: Implications for theoretical models. Journal of Homosexuality, 8(1), 47-60.Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L (Eds.). (1997). The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nagler, M. (Ed.) (1993). Perspectives on disability (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.Google Scholar
  40. Oliver, M. (1996). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In L. Barton (Ed.) Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 18-42). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  41. Rust, P. C. (1993). “Coming out” in the age of social constructionism: Sexual identity formation among lesbian and bisexual women. Gender and Society, 7(1), 50-77.Google Scholar
  42. Swan, W. K. (1997). (Ed.). Gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender public policy issues: A citizen's and administrator's guide to the new cultural struggle. Binghamton, New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  43. Vicinus, M. (1992). “They wonder to which sex I belong”: The historical roots of the modern lesbian identity. Feminist Studies, 18(3), 467-497.Google Scholar
  44. Witkin, S. L. (1990). The implications of social constructionism for social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 4(2), 37-47.Google Scholar
  45. Wolff, C. (1977). Bisexuality—a study. New York: Quartet Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth P. Cramer
    • 1
  • Stephen F. Gilson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social WorkVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmond

Personalised recommendations