Journal of Superconductivity

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 187–190 | Cite as

Study of Spin-Valve Operation in Permalloy–SiO2–Silicon Nanostructures

  • S. Hacia
  • T. Last
  • S. F. Fischer
  • U. Kunze


Magnetotransport studies are performed on nanoscale Permalloy(Py)–(Mg)–SiO2-degenerate Si(100) tunneling devices in spin-valve geometry with and without Mg interlayer. Highly remanent, single domain Py electrodes (15–100-μm length, 100–1000-nm width) are realized by electron-beam lithography, electron-beam evaporation, and subsequent lift-off. Different widths ensure subsequent switching of the Py nanoelectrodes in increasing magnetic fields. A suppression of spin-polarized current is expected for antiparallel magnetization configuration of source and drain contacts (i.e. positive magnetoresistance) if spin injection and detection have been successfully implemented. Magnetic hysteresis curves of Py nanowire arrays measured at temperatures from 5 K up to 300 K reveal increasing coercive fields (up to 40 mT) for decreased nanowire widths as required for device operation. Small positive magnetoresistance is observed for the spin-valve geometry with Mg interlayer at 4.2 K, contrary to the negative anisotropic magnetoresistance measured of single wires.

spin-polarized transport magnetotransport nanostructure silicon tunneling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awshalom, R. A. Buhrmann, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova and D. M. Treger, Science 294, 1488(2001).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. T. Filip, B. H. Hoving, F. J. Jedema, B. J. van Wees, B. Dutta, and S. Borghs, Phys. Rev. B 62, 9996(2000).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. I. Rashba, Phys. Rev. B 62(24), R16267(2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Meservey, D. Paraskevopoulos and P. M. Tedrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 858(1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Nadgorny, R. J. Soulen, M. S. Osofsky, I. I. Mazin, G. Labgrade, R. J. M. van de Veerdonk, A. A. Smits, S. F. Cheng, E. F. Skelton and S. B. Qadri, Phys. Rev. B 61, R3788(2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Hubert and R. Schäfer, Magnetic Domains (Springer, Berlin, 2000).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Q. Jia, R. C. Shi and S. Y. Chou, IEEE Trans. Mag. 32, 4707(1996).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. R. McGuire and R. I. Potter, IEEE Trans. Magn. 4, 1018(1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. LeClair, J. T. Kohlhepp, H. J. M Swagten, and W. J. M de Jonge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1066(2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Hacia
    • 1
  • T. Last
    • 1
  • S. F. Fischer
    • 1
  • U. Kunze
    • 1
  1. 1.Werkstoffe und NanoelektronikRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations