Skip to main content
Log in

From Unfulfilled Wants to the Experience of Injustice: Women's Sense of Injustice Regarding the Lopsided Division of Household Labor

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research deals with factors that contribute to women's sense of injustice regarding the lopsided division of household labor. The proposed model of perceived injustice combines elements of the distributive justice framework of Major (1993) and Thompson (1991), the two-factor model of relative deprivation (Crosby, 1982), and the attribution-of-blame model of judgments of injustice (Mikula, 1993). The results of a study with 132 employed women are consistent with the proposed model and show that unfulfilled wants, perceived violations of entitlement, and attributions of blame directly affect women's perceptions of being unjustly treated by their partners. Beyond that, women's judgments of injustice were indirectly affected by the outcomes of various comparison processes through their impact on perceived violations of entitlement. Finally, attributions of responsibility and perceived lack of justifications contributed indirectly to the experience of injustice through their impact on the amount of blame attributed to the partner. The findings provide evidence for the usefulness of the theories considered in this study to understand and predict women's sense of injustice, and their integration into a single model of perceived injustice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Benin, M. H., and Agostinelli, J. (1988). Husbands' and wives' satisfaction with the division of labor. J. Marr. Fam. 50: 349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. F. (1985). The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., and Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives' perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. J. Marr. Fam. 54: 570–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative Deprivation and Working Women. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., and Gonzales-Intal, A. M. (1984). Relative deprivation and equity theories. In Folger, R. (ed.), The Sense of Injustice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., Muehrer, P., & Loewenstein, G. (1986). Relative deprivation and explanation: Models and concepts. In Olson, H., Herman, C. P., and Zanna, M. P. (eds.), Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris A., and Longmore, M. A. (1996). Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. Soc. Forces 74: 1043–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demo D. H., and Acock, A. C. (1993). Family diversity and the division of domestic labor: How much have things really changed? Fam. Rel. 42: 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Soc. Forces 74: 1029–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. J., Marshall, C. M., and Meiners, K. M. (1995). Exploring wives' sense of fairness about family work. J. Fam. Issues 16: 693–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software International, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, D., Shelton, B. A., and Luschen, K. (1995). Race, ethnicity, gender and perceptions of fairness. J. Fam. Issues 16: 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M. C., and Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. Am. J. Sociol. 100: 506–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. J. Pers. 45: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Soc. Justice Res. 1: 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1991). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement. In Vermunt, R., and Steensma, H. (eds.), Social Justice in Human Relations, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. Rev. Pers. Soc. Psych. 7: 124–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor. J. Soc. Issues 49: 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparison, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 26: 293–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mederer, H. J. (1993). Division of labor in two-earner homes: Task accomplishment versus household management as critical variables in perceptions about family work. J. Marr. Fam. 55: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1993). On the experience of injustice. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 4: 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1998). Division of household labor and perceived justice: A growing field of research. Soc. Justice Res. 11: 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula G., Freudenthaler, H. H. Brennacher-Kröll, S., and Brunschko, B. (1997). Division of household labor, perceived justice, and satisfaction in student-households. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 19: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1991). Coping with life stress. Injustice and the question “who is responsible?” In Steensma, H., and Vermunt, R. (eds.), Social Justice in Human Relations, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1994). SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1, SPSS, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1985). Working wives/Working husbands, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and Spitze, G. (1992). Whistle while you work? The effect of household task performance on women's and men's well-being. Soc. Sci. Quart. 73: 844–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L. (1994). Gender, labor allocations, and the psychology of entitlement within the home. Soc. Forces 73: 533–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., and John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Ann. Rev Sociol. 22: 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, G. (1988). Women's employment and family relations: A review. J. Marr. Fam. 50: 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1991), Family work: Women's sense of fairness. J. Fam. Issues 12: 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., and Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. J. Marr. Fam. 51: 845–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. A. (1993). Marital happiness and household equity in later life. J. Marr. Fam. 55: 427–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. K., and Brinkerhoff, D. B. (1981). Children's work in the family: Its significance and meaning. J. Marr. Fam. 43: 789–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, G. M., and Clark, M. S. (1989). The communal/exchange distinction and some implications for understanding justice in families. Soc. Justice Res. 3: 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yogev, S. (1981). Do professional women have egalitarian marriage relationships? J. Marr. Fam. 43: 865–871.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heribert H. Freudenthaler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freudenthaler, H.H., Mikula, G. From Unfulfilled Wants to the Experience of Injustice: Women's Sense of Injustice Regarding the Lopsided Division of Household Labor. Social Justice Research 11, 289–312 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023238900697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023238900697

Navigation