Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution and Relative Size of the Swim Bladder in Percina, With Comparisons to Etheostoma, Crystallaria, and Ammocrypta (Teleostei: Percidae)

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of the swim bladder was examined in 20 species representing all four genera (Percina, Etheostoma, Crystallaria, and Ammocrypta) of darters (Etheostomatini). Including data on species examined in other studies, swim bladders have been found in 15 of 17 species of Percina, but were absent in Crystallaria asprella, Ammocrypta pellucida, and the 18 species of Etheostoma examined. Relative swim bladder length in Percina was shown to be positively correlated with body size. Although not statistically significant, swim bladder size also correlates with habitat (riffle, run, or pool) and swimming behavior (midwater or benthic).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Bailey, R.M. & W.A. Gosline. 1955. Variation and systematic significance of vertebral counts in the American fishes of the family Percidae. Misc. Publ. Univ. Mich. Mus. Zool. 93: 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadias, E. & J.H. Gee. 1987. Variables affecting buoyancy in three species of Percina (Pisces). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 87: 275-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, C.N. 1941. A comparative study of the gross anatomy of the air-bladders of ten families of fishes of New York and other eastern states. J. Morph. 68: 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.H. 1974. Adjustment of buoyancy and excess internal pressure of swimbladder gases in some North American freshwater fishes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31: 1139-1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, W. 1975. Anatomy of Fishes. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. 612 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D.S. & H.E. Copeland. 1877. The sand darter. Amer. Nat. 11: 86-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.J. & H.W. Robinson. 1973. The Fishes of Oklahoma. Oklahoma State University Press, Stillwater. 246 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G.D. 1937. A study of the vestigial gas bladder in the darter (Catonotis flabellaris Rafinesque). J. Denison Univ. Sci. Lab. 31: 143-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, L.M. 1983. Handbook of Darters. TFH Publications, Neptune City. 271 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, L.M. 2000. Etheostomatinae. pp. 225-253. In: J.F. Craig (ed.) Percid Fishes: Systematics, Ecology and Exploitation, Fish and Aquatic Series 3, Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, L.M. & D.L. Swofford. 1984. Morphological correlates of ecological specialization in darters. Env. Biol. Fish. 11: 139-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, C., T.J. Near, & L.M. Page. 1998. Phylogenetic relations among percid fishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b DNA sequence data. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 10: 343-353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dallas Evans, J., Page, L.M. Distribution and Relative Size of the Swim Bladder in Percina, With Comparisons to Etheostoma, Crystallaria, and Ammocrypta (Teleostei: Percidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 66, 61–65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023238125892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023238125892

Navigation