Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 25–39 | Cite as

Why You Can't Kick the Bucket as You Slowly Die: Verbs in Idiom Comprehension

  • Jennifer L. Hamblin
  • Raymond W. GibbsJr.
Article

Abstract

Idiomatic phrases differ in their degree of analyzability. Some idioms are highly decomposable with their parts independently contributing to their overall figurative meaning (e.g. pop the question) while other idioms are nondecomposable with parts that do not contribute to their idiomatic meaning (e.g. kick the bucket). Nonetheless, even the parts of nondecomposable idioms might have a role in determining what they specifically mean. For example, the verb kick, in kick the bucket implies a quickness or suddenness to the death such that kick the bucket means “to die suddenly” rather than “to die slowly.” We report the findings of three experiments showing, in different ways, how the action of the verb contributes to the overall figurative meaning for some nondecomposable idioms. Together, these studies suggest that even nondecomposable idioms are not truly frozen as, at least, part of their overall figurative meanings are shaped by the particular verbs used in these phrases.

Keywords

Cognitive Psychology Figurative Meaning Idiomatic Phrase Idiomatic Meaning Nondecomposable Idiom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Boatner, M., Gates, J., & Makkai, A. (1975). A dictionary of American idioms. New York: Baron's Educational Series.Google Scholar
  2. Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Understanding idiomatic expressions: The contribution of word meanings. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 217-240). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, C. W. (Ed.). (1989). Webster's new thesaurus. New York: Windsor Court.Google Scholar
  5. Fraser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language, 6, 22-42.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1991). Semantic analyzability in children's understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 613-620.Google Scholar
  7. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 485-506.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1993). Process and products in making sense of tropes. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 252-276). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1995). Idiomaticity and human cognition. In M. Everhaert, E. J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 97-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Nayak, N. P. (1989). Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 100-138.Google Scholar
  12. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., Bolton, J. L., & Keppel, M. E. (1989). Speakers' assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory & Cognition, 17, 58-68.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576-593.Google Scholar
  14. Glucksberg, S. (1993). Idiom meaning and allusional content. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 3-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Katz, J. (1973). Compositionality, idiomaticity, and lexical substitution. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 357-376). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  16. Kreuz, R. J., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). Aspects of idiom interpretation: Comment on Nayak and Gibbs. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 120, 90-92.Google Scholar
  17. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Long, T., & Summers, D. (1979). Longman dictionary of English idioms. London, England: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Makkai, A., Boatner, M. T., & Gates, J. E. (1991). Handbook of commonly used American idioms. New York: Barrons.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, J. A., Bradley, H., Craigie, W. A., & Onions, C. T. (Eds.). (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed. prepared by J. A. Simpson, & E. S. C. Weiner). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nunberg, G. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Hamblin
    • 1
  • Raymond W. GibbsJr.
  1. 1.University of California, Santa CruzSanta Cruz

Personalised recommendations