Abstract
The present study investigates the relationship between gender processing and the properties of speech errors. Studying German noun substitution errors it was found that intended and intruded nouns were more often of the same grammatical gender than one would expect by chance (“identical gender effect”). In the present study, German slips of the tongue were investigated on the assumption that the occurrence of the identical gender effect depends on the processing level, where the error arises. The syntactic context preceding errors of nonidentical gender was also explored. In the German language, interactions of nonidentical gender nouns often result in agreement violations. It can be shown that gender congruency between nouns and preceding articles also depends on the processing level at which the noun error occurs. The results are consistent with two-stage models of lexical retrieval and speech production, according to which the syntactic information of a noun is only represented during the first stage of lexical access.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificial elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391.
Berg, Th. (1992). Prelexical and postlexical features in language production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 199-235.
van Berkum, J. J. A. (1996). The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A., & Boehnke, K. (1990). Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Berlin: Springer.
Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 103-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the 'tip of the tongue' phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343.
Cutler, A. (1982). The reliability of speech error data. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production. Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter.
Cutler, A. (1988). The perfect speech error. In L. M. Hyman & Ch. N. Li (Eds.), Language, speech and mind: studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin (pp. 209-223). New York: Routledge.
Cutler, A., & Fay, D. A. (1982). One mental lexicon, phonologically arranged: Comments on Hurford's comments. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 1.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283-321.
Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
Fay, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon, Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505-520.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The nonanomalous nature of anomalous utterance. Language, 47, 27-52.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Pychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 9 (pp. 133-175). New York: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sentence production. In R. J. Wales & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanismus (pp. 231-255). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Garrett, M. F. (1980a). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1 (pp. 177-220). London: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1980b). The limits of accommodation: arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 263-271). London: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions (pp. 19-76). London: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production. Applications to aphasic speech. In D. Caplan, A. R. Lecours, & A. Smith (Eds.), Biological perspectives on language (pp. 172-193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 69-96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1990). Sentence processing. In D. N. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), Language. An invitation to cognitive science, Vol. 1 (pp. 133-175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1992a). Lexical retrieval processes: Semantic field effects. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 377-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Garrett, M. F. (1992b). Disorders of lexical selection. Cognition, 42, 143-180.
Garrett, M. F. (1993). Errors and their relevance for models of language production. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. Marshall, & C. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 72-92). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hurford, J. R. (1981). Malapropismus, left-to-right listing, and lexicalism. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(3), 419-423.
Jescheniak, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824-843.
Köpcke, K.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, Th., & Havinga, J. (1991a). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review 98, 122-142.
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, Th., & Havinga, J. (1991b). Normal and deviant lexical processing: Reply to Dell and O'Seaghdha (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 615-618.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
Marx, E. (1998). Versprecher und Genusverarbeitung (Speech errors and gender processing). Unpublished inaugural dissertation. Köln.
Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246-251.
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking. Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69, 219-230.
Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
van Turenhout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Language, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787-806.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186-215.
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italien tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Martin, R. C., & Garrett, M. F. (1999). Is 'count' and 'mass' information available when the noun is not? An investigation of the tip of the tongue states and anomia (submitted).
Zubin, D. A. & Köpcke, K. M. (1986). Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical and lexical categorization. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 139-180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marx, E. Gender Processing in Speech Production: Evidence from German Speech Errors. J Psycholinguist Res 28, 601–621 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023216927241
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023216927241