Skip to main content
Log in

Hyperfunction Quantum Field Theory: Localized Fields Without Localized Test Functions

  • Published:
Letters in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note addresses the problem of localization in quantum field theory; more specifically we contribute to the ongoing discussion about the most appropriate concept of localization which one should use in relativistic quantum field theory: through localized test functions or through the fields directly without localized test functions. In standard quantum field theory, i.e., in relativistic quantum field theory in terms of tempered distributions according to Gårding and Wightman, this is done through localized test functions. In hyperfunction quantum field theory (HFQFT), i.e., relativistic quantum field theory in terms of Fourier hyperfunctions this is done through the fields themselves. In support of the second approach we show here that it has a much wider range of applicability. It can even be applied to relativistic quantum field theories which do not admit compactly supported test functions at all. In our construction of explicit models we rely on basic results from the theory of quasi-analytic functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boas, R. P.: Entire Functions, Pure Appl. Math., Academic Press, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bogolubov, N. N., Logonov, A. A. and Todorov, I. T.: Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory, W. A. Benjamin, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brüning, E. and Nagamachi, S.: Hyperfunction quantum field theory: Basic structural results, J. Math. Physics 30 (1989), 2340–2359.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfand, I. and Silov, G.: Spaces of Fundamental and Generalized Functions, Vol. 2 of Generalized Functions, Academic Press, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grosse, H., Oberguggenberger, M. and Todorov, I. T.: Generalized functions for quantum fields obeying quadratic exchange relations, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 238 (2000), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hörmander, L.: The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 256, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nagamachi, S. and Brüning, E.: Hyperfunction quantum field theory: Analytic structure, modular aspects, and local observable algebras, J. Math. Phys. 42(1) (2001), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagamachi, S. and Mugibayashi, N.: Hyperfunction quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagamachi, S. and Mugibayashi, N.: Hyperfunction quantum field theory II. Euclidean Greens functions, Comm. Math. Phys. 49 (1976), 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nagamachi, S. and Mugibayashi, N.: Hyperfunctions and renormalization, J. Math. Phys. 27 (1986), 832–839.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rieckers, A.: Power series of the free field as operator-valued functionals on spaces of type S, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 4 (1971), 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Streater, R. F. and Wightman, A. S.: PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Treves, F.: Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels, Pure Appl. Math., Academic Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagamachi, S., Brüning, E. Hyperfunction Quantum Field Theory: Localized Fields Without Localized Test Functions. Letters in Mathematical Physics 63, 141–155 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023084312072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023084312072

Navigation