Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social networks and risk of neural tube defects

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contribution of social support and social networks to risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) has not been explored, despite evidence that various aspects of the social environment contribute to their etiology. Using data from a population-based case–control study of deliveries occurring in California from 1989 to 1991, this study investigates whether social networks, as measured by the presence and frequency of various types of social contacts, are associated with NTD risk. In-person interviews were conducted with 538 (88% of eligible) mothers of NTD cases and with mothers of 539 non-malformed controls (88%) on average 5 months from the term delivery date. Unadjusted results indicate that women who reported having close friends, close relatives, or monthly contacts with close friends or relatives had 30–70% lower risks of having NTD-affected pregnancies, relative to women reporting ‘none’ to any of these measures. Only the presence of close friends was associated with reduced NTD risk after adjustment for other aspects of the social network and several potential covariates. This study is the first to investigate the association between social networks and risk of NTDs. Stronger inferences await replication and extension of these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cassel J. The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. Am J Epidemiol 1976; 104: 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: Anine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109: 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  3. House J, Robbins C, Metzner HL. The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: Prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116(1): 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glass TA, Mendes de Leon CF, Seeman TE, Berkman LF. Beyond single indicators of social networks: A Lisrel analysis of social ties among the elderly. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(10): 1503–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman T. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 843–857.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berkman LF. The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosom Med 1995; 57: 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Welin C, Lappas G, Wilhelmsen L. Independent importance of psychosocial factors for prognosis after myocardial infarction. J Internal Med 2000; 237: 629–639.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leserman J, Petitto JM, Golden RN, et al. Impact of stressful life events, depression, social support, coping, and cortisol on progression to AIDS. Am J Psychiatr 2000; 157: 1221–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney JM. Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 1997; 277: 1940–1944.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norbeck JS, DeJoseph JF, Smith RT. Arandomized trial of an empirically-derived social support intervention to prevent low birthweight among African American women. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 947–954.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oakley A, Rajan L, Grant A. Social support and pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collins NL, Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M, Scrimshaw SCM. Social support in pregnancy: Psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. J Personality Social Psychology 1993; 65(6): 1243–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seeman TE. Social ties and health: The benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol 1996; 6(5): 442–451.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: Areview with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 488–531.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elwood JM, Little J, Elwood JH. Epidemiology and control of neural tube defects. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wasserman CR, Shaw GM, Selvin S, Gould JB, Syme SL. Socioeconomic status, neighborhood social conditions, and neural tube defects. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1674–1680.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards JH. Congenital malformations of the central nervous system in Scotland. Brit J Prev Soc Med 1958; 12: 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bower C, Hobbs M, Carney A, Simpson D. Neural tube defects in Western Australia 1966-1981 and a review of Australian data 1942-1981. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1984; 38: 208–213.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bound JP, Harvey PW, Francis BJ, Awwad F, Gatrell AC. Involvement of deprivation and environmental lead in neural tube defects: Amatched case-control study. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw GM, Schaffer D, Velie EM, Morland K, Harris JA. Periconceptional vitamin use, dietary folate, and the occurrence of neural tube defects. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Croen LA, Shaw GM, Jensvold NJ, Harris JA. Birth defects monitoring in California: Aresource for epidemiologic research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1991; 5: 423–427.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 453–469.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Berkman LF. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: Afollow-up study of Alameda County residents. Doctoral dissertation. Berkeley: University of California, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seeman TE, Berkman LF. Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: Who provides support. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26(7): 737–749.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Feldman PJ, Dunkel-Schetter C, Sandman CA, Wadhwa PD. Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosom Med 2000; 62: 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman S, Hatch MC. Stress, social support and pregnancy outcome: Areassessment based on recent research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1996; 10: 380–405.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael YL, Berkman LF, Colditz GA, Kawachi I. Living arrangements, social integration, and change in functional health status. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153(2): 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seeman TE, McEwen BS. Impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation. Psychosom Med 1996; 58: 459–471.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carmichael SL, Shaw GM. Maternal life event stress and congenital anomalies. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hansen D, Lou HC, Olsen J. Serious life events and congenital malformations: Anational study with complete follow-up. Lancet 2000; 356: 875–880.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shaw GM, Todoroff K, Velie EM, Lammer EJ. Maternal illness, including fever, and medication use as risk factors for neural tube defects. Teratology 1998; 57: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berkman LF. Assessing social networks and social support in epidemiologic studies. Rev Epidem Sante Publ 1987; 35(1): 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oxman TE, Berkman LF. Assessment of social relationships in elderly patients. Int J Psychiatry Med 1990; 20(1): 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation/California Department of Health Services, Oakland, USA

    Suzan L. Carmichael, Gary M. Shaw & Eric Neri

  2. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, USA

    Donna M. Schaffer

  3. Divisions of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Steve Selvin

Authors
  1. Suzan L. Carmichael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gary M. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Neri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donna M. Schaffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steve Selvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmichael, S.L., Shaw, G.M., Neri, E. et al. Social networks and risk of neural tube defects. Eur J Epidemiol 18, 129–133 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023079326786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023079326786

Search

Navigation