Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 949–958 | Cite as

Oscillation of mRNA level and activity of granule-bound starch synthase I in Arabidopsis leaves during the day/night cycle

  • Germán Tenorio
  • Alicia Orea
  • José M. Romero
  • Ángel Mérida
Article

Abstract

Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) is one of the most extensively studied enzymes of the starch synthesis pathway and its role in the synthesis of amylose has been well established. However, few studies have been carried out to characterize the regulation of GBSSI gene. Regulation of starch synthesis genes is especially interesting in photosynthetic tissues, where starch is subjected to a periodical alternation of synthesis and degradation during the day/night cycle. In this report we show a circadian oscillation of GBSSI mRNA levels in leaves of Arabidopsis during the day/night cycle, and provide evidence that GBSSI expression is controlled by the transcription factors CCA1 and LHY. Over-expression of both CCA1 and LHY genes causes the elimination of GBSSI mRNA oscillation. Binding shift assays indicate that this control may be exerted through a direct interaction of those regulatory proteins with the GBSSI promoter. Oscillation is not observed on the GBSSI protein levels, which remains constant along the cycle. However, GBSSI activity shows a clear oscillation with a period of 24 h that is altered in transgenic plants over-expressing CCA1. Possible mechanisms controlling GBSSI activity during the day/night cycle are discussed.

activity regulation circadian-clock regulation starch waxy gene 

References

  1. Alabadi, D., Oyama, T., Yanovsky, M.J., Harmon, F.G., Mas, P. and Kay, S.A. 2001. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293: 880–883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alabadí, D., Yanovsky, M.J., Más, P., Harmer, S.L. and Kay, S. 2002. Critical role for CCA1 and LHY in maintaining circadian rhythmicity in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 12: 757–761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A. and Struhl, K. (Eds.). 1987. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Willey-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S.G., van de Wal, M.H.B.J. and Visser, R.G.F. 1998. Progress in understanding the biosynthesis of amylose. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 462–467.Google Scholar
  5. Bernier, G., Havelange, A., Houssa, C., Petitjean, A. and Lejeune, P. 1993. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5: 1147–1155.Google Scholar
  6. Delrue, B., Fontaine, T., Routier, F., Decq, A., Wieruszeski, J.M., van der Koornhuyse, N., Maddelein, M.L., Fournet, B. and Ball, S. 1992. Waxy Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: monocelular algal mutants defective in amylose biosynthesis and granulebound starch synthase activity accumulate a structurally modified amylopectin J. Bact. 174: 3612–3620.Google Scholar
  7. Denyer, K., Barber, L.M., Burton, R., Hedley, C.L. Hylton, C.M., Johnson, S., Jones, D.A., Marshall, J., Smith, A.M., Tatge, H., Tomlison, K. and Wang, T.L. 1995. The isolation and characterization of novel low-amylose mutants of Pisum sativum L. Plant Cell Environ. 18: 1019–1026.Google Scholar
  8. Denyer, K., Barber, L.M., Edward, E.A., Smith, A.M. and Wang, T.L. 1997. Two isoforms of the GBSSI class of granule-bound starch synthase are differentially expressed in the pea plant (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Environ. 20: 1566–1572.Google Scholar
  9. Denyer, K., Johnson, P., Zeeman, S. and Smith, A.M. 2001.The control of amylose synthesis. J. Plant Physiol 158: 479–487.Google Scholar
  10. Harmer, S.L., Hogenesc, L.B., Straume, M., Chang, H.S., Han, B., Zhu, T., Wang, X., Kreps, J.A. and Kay, S.A. 2000. Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290: 2110–2113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirano, H.Y. and Sano, Y. 1991. Molecular characterization of the waxy locus of rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Cell Physiol. 32: 989–997.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, T.L. and Ort, D.R. 1997. Circadian regulation of sucrose phosphate synthase activity in tomato by protein phosphatase activity. Plant Physiol. 113: 1167–1175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Khoshnoodi, J., Larsson, C.T., Larsson, H. and Rask, L. 1998. Differential accumulation of Arabidopsis thaliana Sbe2.1 and Sbe2.2 transcripts in response to light. Plant Sci. 135: 183–193.Google Scholar
  14. LaGrandeur, T.E., Hüttenhofer, A, Noller, H.F. and Pace, N.R. 1994. Phylogenetic comparative chemical footprint analysis of the interaction between ribonuclease P RNA and tRNA. EMBO J. 13: 3945–3952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lillo, C., Meyer, C. and Ruoff, P. 2001. The nitrate reductase circadian system. The central clock dogma contra multiple oscillatory feedback loops. Plant Physiol. 125: 1554–1557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Makino, S., Matsushika, A., Kojima, M., Yamashino, T. and Mizuno, T. 2002. The APRR1/TOC1 quintent implicated in circadian rhythms of Arabidopsis thaliana. 1. Characterization with APRR1-overexpressing plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 58–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsushika, A., Makino, S., Kojima, M., Yamashino, T. and Mizuno. 2002. The APRR1/TOC1 quintent implicated in circadian rhythms of Arabidopsis thaliana. 2. Characterization with CCA1-overexpressing plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 118–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mérida, A., Rodríguez-Galán, J.M., Vincent, C. and Romero, J.M. 1999. Expression of the granule-bound starch synthase I (waxy) gene from snapdragon is developmentally and circadian-clock regulated. Plant Physiol. 120: 401–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mizoguchi, T., Wheatley, K., Hanzawa, Y., Wright, L., Mizoguchi, M., Song, H.R., Carré I.A. and Coupland. G. 2002. LHY and CCA1 are partially redundant genes required to maintain circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 2: 629–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moorhead, G., Douglas, P., Cotelle, V., Harthill, J., Morrice, N., Meek, S., Deiting, U., Stitt, M., Scarabel, M., Aitken, A. and Mackintosh, C. 1999. Phosphorylation-dependent interactions between enzymes of plant metabolism and 14–3-3 proteins. Plant J. 18: 1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, O. and Pan, D. 1995. Starch synthesis in maize endosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 475–496.Google Scholar
  22. Prescott, A. and Martin, C. 1987. A rapid method for the quantitative assessment of levels of specific mRNAs in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 4: 219–224.Google Scholar
  23. Rook, F., Corke, F., Card, R., Munz, G., Smith, C. and Bevan, M.W. 2001. Impaired sucrose-induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar-induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling. Plant J. 26: 421–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schaffer, R., Ramsay, N., Samach, A., Corden, S., Putterill, J., Carré, I.A. and Coupland, G. 1998. The late elongated hypocotyl mutation of Arabidopsis disrupts circadian rhythms and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Cell 23: 1219–1229.Google Scholar
  25. Schulze, W., Schulze, E.D., Stadler, J., Heilmeier, H., Stitt, M. and Mooney, H.A. 1994. Growth and reproduction of Arabidopsis thaliana in relation to storage of starch and nitrate in the wildtype and in starch-deficient and nitrate-uptake-deficient mutants. Plant Cell Environ. 17: 795–809.Google Scholar
  26. Sehnke, P.C., Chung, H.J., Wu, K. and Ferl, R.J. 2001. Regulation of starch accumulation by granule-associated plant 14–3-3 proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 765–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sivak, M.N., and Preiss, J. 1998. Starch: Basic Science to Biotechnology. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, vol. 41. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, A.M. 1990. Evidence that the waxy protein of pea (Pisum sativum L.) is not the major starch granule-bound starch synthase. Planta 182: 599–604.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, A.M., Denyer, K. and Martin, C. 1997. The synthesis of the starch granule Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 67–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sokolov, L.N., Dejardin, A. and Kleczkowski, L.A. 1998. Sugars and light/dark exposure trigger differential regulation of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana (thalecress). Biochem. J. 336: 681–687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Somers, D.E., Webb, A.A.R., Pearson, M. and Kay, S.A. 1998. The short-period mutant, toc1–1, alters circadian clock regulation of multiple outputs throughout development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125: 485–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun, L., Doxsee, R.A., Harel, E. and Tobin, E.M. 1993. CA-1, a novel phosphoprotein, interacts with the promoter of the cab140 gene in Arabidopsis and is undetectable in det1 mutant seedlings. Plant Cell 5:109–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Visser, R.G.F., Hergersberg, M., van der Leij, F.R., Jacobsen, E., Withol, B. and Feenstra, W.J. 1989. Molecular cloning and partial characterization of the gene for granule-bound starch synthase from a wild-type and amylose-free potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Sci. 64: 185–192.Google Scholar
  34. Visser, R.G.F., Stolte, A. and Jacobsen, E. 1991. Expression of a chimaeric granule-bound starch synthase-GUS gene in transgenic potato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 691–699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vrinten, P.L. and Nakamura, T. 2000. Wheat granule-bound starch synthase I and II are encoded by separates genes that are expressed in different tissues. Plant Physiol. 122: 255–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, S.J., Yeh, K.W. and Tsai, C.Y. 2001. Regulation of starch granule-bound starch synthase I gene expression by circadian clock and sucrose in the source tissue of sweet potato. Plant Sci. 161: 635–644.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, Z.Y. and Tobin, E.M. 1998. Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 23: 1207–1217.Google Scholar
  38. Wang, Z.Y., Kenigsbuch, D., Sun, L., Hare,l E., Ong, M.S. and Tobin, E.M. 1997. A myb-related transcription factor is involved in the phytochrome regulation of an Arabidopsis Lhcb gene. Plant Cell 9: 491–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wingler, A., Fritzius, T., Wiemken, A., Boller, T. and Aeschbacher, R.A. 2000. Trehalose induces the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene, ApL3, and starch synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 124: 105–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yanovsky, M.J. and Kay, S.A. 2001. Signaling networks in the plant circadian system. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 429–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zabawinski, C, van den Koornhuyse, N., D'Hulst, C., Schlichting, R., Giersch, C., Delrue, B., Lacroix, J.M., Preiss, J. and Ball, S. 2001. Starchless mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii lack the small subunit of a heterotetrameric ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. J. Bact. 183: 1069–1077.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Germán Tenorio
    • 1
  • Alicia Orea
    • 1
  • José M. Romero
    • 1
  • Ángel Mérida
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis CSIC-USESpain

Personalised recommendations