Skip to main content

Public Enterprise Reform in Fiji Islands

Abstract

Reforming the public sector has been on the agenda of nations throughout the world since the late 1970s. Fiji is no exception. It has embarked on reforming its commercial and industrial enterprises since the late 1980s. The government of Fiji has reformed most of its enterprises with an avowed objective of enhancing profitability, productivity, efficiency and accountability. This paper makes an attempt to share some of the experiences of public enterprise reform process in Fiji. It aims to analyze the background, process, contents and impact of the reform and examine the factors impeding the reform program. It highlights that (a) both internal and external factors were responsible for introducing reforms; (b) the reform efforts have not been able to produce desired results; (c) the structural inadequacies in institutions and organizations have created bottlenecks in the reform process; and (d) uncertainty in the political sphere has contributed further to policy shifts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB). (1998). Solomon Islands: 1997 Economic Report. Manila: ADB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, P.K. (1994). “Demystifying Privatization in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 7(3), 44‐55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulai, N. (1996).”Fiji”, in Asia Productivity Organization. Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises. Tokyo, Japan APO, pp. 110‐167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, K. (1999). Performance Management in the Public Sector in Fiji: Implications of Leadership, Culture and Competency on the Performance of Public Sector Organizations. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of the South Pacific.

  • Collier, B., and S. Pitkin, (eds.) (1999). Corporatization and Privatization in Australia. Sydney: CCH Australia Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P., and C. Kirkpatrick. (1998). “Privatization, Employment and Social Protection in Developing Countries.” In P. Cook, C. Kirkpatrick and F. Nixson (eds.), Privatization, Enterprise Development and Economic Reform: Experiences of Developing and Transitional Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 251‐264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common, R. (1998). “Convergence and Transfer: A Review of the Globalization of New Public Management.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 11(6), 440‐450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Secretariat (1991). Public Enterprise Management: Strategies for Success, Vols. 1 and 2. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. (1995). “Achieving Improvements in Economic Transitions: The Australian Experience.” Public Administration and Development 15(3), 237‐257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Public Enterprises. (1998). Towards a Better Fiji: The Public Enterprise Reform Program. Suva: Ministry of Commerce, Industry, Cooperatives and Public Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djerdour, M., and R. Patel. (2000). “Implementation of Quality Programs in Developing Countries: A Fiji Islands Case Study.” Total Quality Management 11(9), 25‐44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubsky, R. and R.D. Pathak, (2001). The Formula for Public Sector Reforms: Public Enterprise Reform in Fiji Islands and Good Governance in Oceania. Suva: University of South Pacific. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, I., and A. Bollard. (1992). Corporatization and Privatization: Lessons from New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferstenberg, P. (1993). “Downsizing: What is Your Game Plan?” Management Review 82(1), 45‐51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Fiji Islanda. (1996). Public Enterprise Act, 1996, Sava L.C.: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guslain, P. (1997). The Privatization Challenge: A Strategic, Legal and Institutional Analysis of International Experience. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M.S. (1996). “The Intellectual Crisis in Public Administration in the Current Epoch of Privatization.” Administration and Society 27(4), 510‐536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque M.S. (2001). “Privatization in Developing Countries: Formal Causes, Critical Reasons, and Adverse Impacts.” In A. Farazmand (ed.), Privatization or Public Enterprise Reform? International Case Studies with Implications for Public Management. Westport: Greenwood, pp. 217‐238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). “A Public Management for all Seasons?” Public Administration 69(1), 3‐19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, O.E. (1998). Public Management and Administration, 2nd. edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N. (1993), “Public Enterprise Reform: Managerial Autonomy, Accountability and Performance Contracts.” Public Administration and Development 13, 129‐152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M.H. (1989). “Corruption, Clientelism and Capitalist Development: An Analysis of State Intervention with a Special Reference to Bangladesh.” Ph.D. Thesis, Kings College, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiggundu, M.N. (1989). Managing Organizations in Developing Countries. Connecticut: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2001). “Aid Dependence and the Quality of Governance: Cross-Country Empirical Tests.” Southern Economic Journal 68(2), 310‐329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapman, B., and C. Saldanha. (1999). Reforms in the Pacific: An Assessment of the Asian Development Bank's Assistance for Reform Programs in the Pacific. Manila: ADB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Z., and D.H. Rosenbloom. (1992). “Editorial: Public Administration in Transition?” Public Administration Review 52(6), 535‐537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmour, P. (1997). Corruption and Governance in the South Pacific. Canberra: ANU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, B. (1998). “Good Governance and Pacific Island States.” In Peter Larmour (ed.), Governance and Reform in the South Pacific. Canberra: The Australian National University, pp. 21‐53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, N. (2001). “The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 676(2), 297‐312.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D., and S.M. Puffer. (1995). “Diamonds and Rust on Russia's Road to Privatization: The Profits and Pitfalls for Western Managers.” Columbia Journal of World Business 30(3), 56‐69.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D., and S.M. Puffer. (1997). “Mikromashina of Moscow: Problems and Opportunities of Privatization.” The Case Research Journal, Fall/Winter, pp. 43‐49.

  • McCourt, W. (1998). “Civil Service Reform Equals Retrenchment? The Experience of 'Right-Sizing' and Retrenchment in Ghana, Uganda and the UK.” In Minogue et al. (eds.), pp. 172‐187.

  • McKinlay, P. (1998). “State-Owned Enterprises and Crown Companies in New Zealand.” Public Administration and Development 18(3), 229‐242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance and Public Enterprise. (1994). Privatization Policy and Strategy for Fiji: Supplement to the 1994 Budget Address. Suva: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minogue, M. (1998). “Changing the State: Concepts and Practice in the Reform of the Public Sector.” In M. Minogue et al. (eds.), pp. 17‐37.

  • Minogue, M., C. Polidano, and D. Hulme. (eds.) (1998). Beyond the New Public Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Miranda, R., and A. Lerner. (1995), “Bureaucracy, Organizational Redundancy, and the Privatization of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 55(2), 193‐200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monga, A.K. (2001). “Public Enterprise Reforms and Privatization in India.” In A. Farazmand(ed.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 459‐472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Marie-Laure, and C. Vicens. (2001). “Redundancy, Business Flexibility and Workers Security: Findings of a Comparative European Survey.” International Labor Review 140(1), 45‐67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhith, A. (1993). “Privatization in Bangladesh.” In Ramanadham (ed.), pp. 445‐458.

  • Nath, N., and G. Chand. (1998). “Smallness, Backwardness and Public Accountability: Public Sector Audit in Fiji and Western Samoa.” A paper presented at the ISLANDS V Conference, Mauritius, 1‐5 July.

  • New Zealand Overseas Development Assistance (NZODA) (1997). Cook Islands: Economic Reforms— Social Impact Assessment. Wellington: NZODA.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1995). “The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development.” In J. Harriss, J. Hunter and C. Lewis (eds.), The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge, pp. 17‐48.

  • Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perevalov, Y., I. Gimadii, and V. Dobrodei. (2000). “Does Privatization Improve Performance of Industrial Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from Russia.” Post-Communist Economies 12(3), 337‐363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polidano, C. (1999). “The New Public Management in Developing Countries.” PPM Working paper No. 13, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

  • Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and Public Services: The Anglo-American Experiences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Enterprise Unit. (1992). Public Enterprise Sector Reform: Supplement to the 1993 Budget Address. Suva: Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Service Commission. Fiji (1993). Management in the Public Sector. Suva: Public Service Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanadham, V. (1993). “Concluding Review.” In V.V. Ramanadham (ed.), pp. 526‐591.

  • Ramanadham, V. (ed.) (1993). Privatization: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, B. (1999). “Good Governance, Administrative Reform and Socio-Economic Realities: A South Pacific Perspective.” International Journal of Social Economics 26(1, 2, 3) 354‐369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, N. (1997). The Implications of Public Sector Reforms on Human Resource Management in the South Pacific: The Case of Fiji.'' A paper presented at the conference on Human Resources and Future Generations in Islands and Small States', 6‐8 November, University of Malta, Valletta, Malta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, N. (1998). “Culture Change in Corporatized Organizations in Fiji.'' A paper presented at the Sietar Congress '98, on Dialogue for Creating a Global Vision, 20‐24 November, Reitaku University, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, N. (2001). “Public Sector Reforms in Fiji Revisited: Policy Makers' Dilemma in an Environment of Political Uncertainty.'' Paper presented at Pan Pacific Conference XVIII, May 2001, Chile.

  • Saez, L., and J. Yang. (2001). “The Deregulation of State-Owned Enterprises in India and China.” Comparative Economic Studies XLlll (3) 69‐97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, A.E., and R.D. Pathak. (2000). “New Public Management: An Analytical Review.” Productivity 41(1), 56‐65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (1998). “Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand's Reforms.” The World Bank Research Observer 13(1), 123‐131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. (1993). “Public Sector Reform: A Critical Overview.'' In Ian Scott and Ian Thynne (eds.), Public Sector Reform: Critical Issues and Perspectives. Hong Kong: AJPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, M.M. (1999). “Bureaucrats in Business: The Roles of Privatization Versus Corporatization in State-owned Enterprise Reform.” World Development 27(1), 115‐136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W. (1998). Pacific Islands Stakeholder Participation in Development: Fiji. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fiji Times (Newspaper), Suva, Issues: 19.6.1999; 21.7.199; 15.9.1999; 7.12.2000; 8.12.2000.

  • The Daily Post (Newspaper), Suva, Issue: 30.11.2001.

  • Turner, M., and D. Hulme. (1997). Governance, Administration and Development. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, S. (1996). “The Human Resources Crisis in Fiji's Public Sector: Trouble in Paradise?” Public Administration and Development 16(1), 91‐103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J., and G. Yarrow. (1988). Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993). Pacific Island Economies: Towards Efficient and Sustainable Economic Growth—Volume 2: Fiji: Country Economic Memorandum. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiping, Huang, and K.P. Kalirajan. (1998). “Enterprise Reform and Technical Efficiency of China's State-Owned Enterprises.” Applied Economics 30(5), 585‐592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, T. (1999). “China's Corporatization Drive: An Evaluation and Policy Implications.” Contemporary Economic Policy 17(4), 530‐539.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SARKER, A., PATHAK, R. Public Enterprise Reform in Fiji Islands. Public Organization Review 3, 55–75 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023048011336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023048011336

  • public enterprise
  • reform
  • privatization
  • corporatization
  • developing countries
  • Fiji islands