Abstract
One of the basic components of a medium influencing somatic embryogenesis of cereals from immature embryos is the type of auxin. According to some researchers, phytohormones can also play an important role during Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. In this first part of research, the influence of three types of auxins used alone or in combination of two on somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in three cereal species has been tested. Eight cultivars of barley, five cultivars of wheat and three cultivars of triticale have been used. Efficiency of plant development on two regeneration media, with and without growth regulators has been compared. Efficiency of regeneration characterized by frequency of explants that form embryogenic callus ranged from 25% for wheat cultivar Torka to 100% for two barley cultivars. Mean number of plantlets regenerating per explant differed significantly (from 2 to 58) depending on the type of auxin in inducing media, the type of regenerating media as well as cultivar. The biggest differences in regeneration efficiency were observed between barley cultivars, however regeneration of plants occurred in all combinations tested. The best regeneration coefficients for most barley cultivars were obtained after culture on dicamba or dicamba with 2,4-D. However, in the case of highly regenerating cv Scarlett, the most effective culture media contained picloram or 2,4-D alone. The highest values of regeneration coefficients for two triticale cultivars (Wanad and Kargo) were obtained on picloram (26.1 and 21.4, respectively) and for `Gabo' on picloram with dicamba (12.6). The range of mean number of regenerated plantlets was from 12 to 30. Dicamba alone or lower concentrations of picloram with 2,4-D were the best media influencing embryogenic callus formation in five wheat cultivars. However, the highest values of regeneration coefficients ranging from 10.6 to 26.8 were obtained at lower concentrations of picloram with 2,4-D or picloram with dicamba. R2 regeneration medium containing growth regulators was significantly better for plantlet development in several combinations (cultivar and induction medium) than the one without growth regulators. Generally, regeneration coefficients for all tested cultivars of three cereal species on the best media were high, ranging from 5.5 for barley cultivar Rodion to 51.6 for another barley cultivar Scarlett. Plantlets developed normally, flowering and setting seed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Ainsley PJ & Aryan AP (1998) Efficient plant regeneration system for immature embryos of Triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack). Plant Growth Regul. 24: 23-30
Arzani A & Mirodjagh S-S (1999) Response of durum wheat cultivars to immature embryo culture, callus induction and in vitro salt stress. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 58: 67-72
Bahieldin A, Dyer WE & Qu R (2000) Concentration effects of dicamba on shoot regeneration in wheat. Plant Breed. 119: 437-439
Barro F, Martin A, Lazzeri PA & Barcel P (1999) Medium optimization for efficient somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature inflorescences and immature scutella of elite cultivars of wheat, barley and tritordeum. Euphytica 108: 161-167
Becker D, Brettschneider R & Lorz H (1994) Fertile transgenic wheat from microprojectile bombardment of scutellar tissue. Plant J. 5: 299-307
Bregitzer P (1992) Plant regeneration and callus type in barley: effects of genotype and culture medium. Crop Sci. 32: 1108-1112
Bregitzer P, Campbell RD & Wu Y (1995) Plant regeneration from barley callus: Effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and phenylacetic acid. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 43: 229-235
Bregitzer P, Dahleen LS & Campbell RD (1998) Enhancement of plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of commercial barley cultivars. Plant Cell Rep. 17: 941-945
Castillo AM, Egana B, Sanz JM & Cistuo L (1998) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from barley cultivars grow in Spain. Plant Cell Rep. 17: 902-906
Chateau S, Sangwan RS & Sangwan-Norreel BS (2000) Competence of Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes and mutants for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer: Role of phytohormones. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1961-1968
Cheng M, Fry JE, Pang S, Zhou H, Hironaka CM, Duncan DR, Conner TW & Wan Y (1997) Genetic transformation of wheat mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol. 115: 971-980
Christou P, Ford TL & Kofron M (1991) Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important Indica and Japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bio/Technology 9: 957-962
Dale PJ & Deambrogio E (1979) A comparison of callus induction and plant regeneration from different explants of Hordeum vulgare. Z. Pflanzenphysiol 94: 65-77
Elena EB & Ginzo HD (1988) Effect of auxin levels on shoot formation with different embryo tissues from a cultivar and a commercial hybrid of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant Physiol. 132: 600-603
Fennell S, Bohorova N, Ginkel M van, Crossa J & Hoisington DA (1996) Plant regeneration from immature embryos of 48 elite CIMMYT bread wheats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 163-169
Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 50: 151-158
Goldstein CS & Kronstad WE (1986) Tissue culture and plant regeneration from immature embryo explants of barley, Hordeum vulgare L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 631-636
He DG, Yang YM & Scott KJ (1989) The effect of macroelements in the induction of embryogenic callus from immature embryos of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 64:251-258
Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T & Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 6: 271-282
Immonen AST (1996) Influence of media and growth regulators on somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration for production of primary Triticales. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 44: 45-52
Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T & Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature Biotech. 14: 745-750
Kachhwaha S & Kothari SL (1996) Plant regeneration from immature embryo explants of Hordeum spontaneum and Hordeum vulgare. Cereal Res. Comm. 24: 27-32
Kachhwaha S, Varshney A & Kothari SL (1997) Somatic embryogenesis and long term high plant regeneration from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using picloram. Cereal Res. Comm. 25: 117-126
Koziel MG, Beland GL, Bowman C, Carozzi NB, Crenshaw R, Crossland L, Dawson J, Desai N, Hill M, Kadwell S, Launis K, Lewis K, Maddox D, McPerson K, Meghji MR, Merlin E, Rhodes R, Warren GW, Wright M & Evola SV (1993) Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived by Bacillus thuringiensis. Bio/Technology 11: 194-200
Lazar MD, Collins GB & Vian WE (1983) Genetic and environmental effects on the growth and differentiation of wheat somatic cell cultures. J. Hered. 74: 353-357
Linacero R & Vasquez AM (1990) Somatic embryogenesis from immature inflorescences of rye. Plant Sci. 72: 253-258
Lührs R & Lörz H (1987) Plant regeneration in vitro from embryogenic cultures of spring-and winter-type barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 16-25
Machii H, Mizuno H, Hirabayashi T, Li H & Hagio T (1998) Screening wheat genotypes for high callus induction and regeneration capability from anther and immature embryo cultures. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 53: 67-74
Maddock SE, Lancaster VA, Risiott R & Franklin J (1983) Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of 25 cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) J. Exp. Bot. 34: 915-926
Mathias RJ & Simpson ES (1986) The interaction of genotype and culture medium on the tissue culture responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) callus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 7: 31-37
Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497
Nadolska-Orczyk A, Orczyk W & Przetakiewicz A (2000) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereals - from technique development to its application. Acta Physiol. Plant. 22: 77-88
Nonohay JS, Mariath JEA & Winge H (1999) Histological analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Brazilian cultivars of barley, Hordeum vulgare vulgare Poaceae. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 929-934
Özgen M, Taret M, Altinok S & Sancak C (1998) Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryo culture of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 331-335
Ozias-Akins P & Vasil IK (1982) Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of Triticum aestivum L. (wheat): Evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasma 110: 95-105
Papenfuss JM & Carman JG (1987) Enhanced regeneration from wheat callus cultures using dicamba and kinetin. Crop Sci. 27: 588-593
Rakoczy-Trojanowska M & Malepszy S (1995) Genetic factors influencing the regeneration ability of rye (Secale cereale L.). II. Immature embryos. Euphytica 83: 233-239
Rashid A. & Vikrant (2001) Comparative study of somatic embryogenesis from immature and mature embryos and organogenesis from leaf-base of Triticale. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 64: 33-38
Redway FA, Vasil V, Lu D & Vasil IK (1990) Identification of callus types for long-term maintenance and regeneration from commercial cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 609-617
Rhodes CA, Green CE & Phillips RL (1986) Factors affecting culture initiation from maize tassels. Plant Sci. 46: 225-232
Rout JR & Lucas WJ (1996) Characterization and manipulation of embryogenic response from in vitro cultured immature inflorescences of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 198: 127-138
Ruiz ML, Rueda J, Peláez MI, Espino FJ, Candela M, Sendino AM & Vásques AM (1992) Somatic embryogenesis, plant regeneration and somaclonal variation in barley. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 28: 97-101
Sangwan RS, Bourgeois Y, Brown S, Vasseur G & Sangwan-Nor-reel BS (1992) Characterization of competent cells and early events of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 188: 439-456
Sears RG & Deckard EL (1982) Tissue culture variability in wheat: Callus induction and plant regeneration. Crop Sci. 22: 546-550
Shimada T (1978) Plant regeneration from the callus induced from wheat embryos. Jpn. J. Genet. 53: 371-374
Songstad DD, Petersen WL & Armstrong CL (1992) Establishment of friable embryogenic (type II) callus from immature tassels of Zea mays (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79: 761-764
Stolarz A & Lörz H (1986) Somatic embryogenesis, in vitro multiplication and plant regeneration from immature embryo explants of hexaploid Triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack). Z. Pflanzenzuchtung 96: 353-362
Thomas MR & Scott KJ (1985) Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis from callus initiated from immature embryos and immature inflorescences of Hordeum vulgare L. J. Plant Physiol. 121: 159-169
Tingay S, McElroy D, Kalla R, Fieg S, Wang M, Thornton S & Brettell R (1997) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation. Plant J. 11: 1369-1376
Varshney A, Kant T, Sharma VK, Rao A & Kothari SL (1996) High frequency plant regeneration from immature embryo cultures of Triticum aestivum and T. durum. Cereal Res. Comm. 24: 409-416
Wan Y & Leumax PG (1994) Generation of large numbers of independently transformed fertile barley plants. Plant Physiol. 104: 37-48
Weeks JT, Anderson OD & Blechl AE (1993) Rapid production of multiple independent lines of fertile transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. 102: 1077-1084
Zhang LJ & Seilleur P (1987) A simple and fast method to obtain high frequency of plant regeneration from mature and immature wheat embryos. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 22: 187-189
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Przetakiewicz, A., Orczyk, W. & Nadolska-Orczyk, A. The effect of auxin on plant regeneration of wheat, barley and triticale. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 73, 245–256 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023030511800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023030511800