Abstract
In this paper we provide an overview of E-Alliance, a software infrastructure we are developing to support negotiation activities in concurrent inter-organisational alliances. Our baseline is to offer a collaboration framework which fully preserves the autonomy of organisations grouped in an alliance, while enabling concurrency of their activities, flexibility of their negotiations and dynamic evolution of their environment. We propose to support negotiation between the partners within such alliances by combining different technologies, such as software engineering techniques, middleware-level coordination facilities and multiagent systems support. We present our approach in the context of a sample scenario of an alliance where partners are printshops capable of (out/in) sourcing print jobs among them to better accomplish their customers' requests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alloui, I. and F. Oquendo. (2001). “Software Process Architecture = Process Components + Intentionbased Interactions,” Proceedings of PDPTA, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Andreoli, J. M. D. Arregui, F. Pacull, M. Riviere, J. Y. Vion-Dury, and J. Williamowski. (1999). “CLF/ Mekano: A Framework for Building Virtual-Enterprise Applications,” Proceedings of EDOC. Mannheim, Germany.
Andreoli, J.-M. and S. Castellani. (2001). “Towards a Flexible Middleware Negotiation Facility for Distributed Components,” Proceedings of “E-Negotiations” (DEXA). Munich, Germany.
Andreoli, J. M., S. Castellani, and M. Munier. (2000). “AllianceNet: Information Sharing, Negotiation and Decision-Making for Distributed Organizations,” Proceedings of EcWeb, Greenwich, U.K.
Barbuceanu, M. and Wai-Kau Lo. (2003). “Multi-attribute Utility Theoretic Negotiation for Electronic Commerce,” AMEC III, LNAI, 15-30.
Bui, V. and R. Kowalczyk. (2003). “On Constraint-based Reasoning in e-negotiation Agents,” AMEC III, LNAI, 31-46.
Carron, T., H. Proton, and O. Boissier. (1999). “A Temporal Agent Communication Language for Dynamic Multi-Agents Systems,” Proceedings of 9th MAAMAW, LNAI 1647.
Charles, J. (1999). “Middleware Moves to the Forefront,” IEEE Computer Magazine 32 (5): 17-19.
Dignum, F. and U. Cortes (eds.). (2001). AMEC III, LNAI. Springer Verlag.
Faratin, P. (2000). “Automated Service Negotiation Between Autonomous Computational Agents,” PhD thesis. Department of Electronic Engineering, Queen Mary & Westfield College.
Finin, T., Y. Chen, Y. Peng, and Y. Labrou. (2000). “A Negotiation-based Multi-agent System for Supply Chain Management,” Issues in Agent Communication, 178-192.
Grefen, P. and S. Angelov. (2001). B2B eContract Handling - A Survey of Projects, Papers and Standards. TR-01-21, CTIT, University of Twente.
Hubner, J., J. S. Sichman, and O. Boissier. (2002). “A Model for the Structural, Functional, and Deontic Specification of Organizations in Multiagent Systems,” Proceedings of SBIA'02, LNAI 2507. Porto de Galinhas, PE, Brazil, 118-128.
Hurwitz, S. M., W. P. (1998). Interoperable Infrastructures for Distributed Electronic Commerce. Nat. Inst. of Standards and Technology, http://www.atp.nist.gov/atp/98wp-ecc.htm.
Keeny, R. and H. Raiffa. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. JohnWilley & Sons.
McConnell, S. (1996). Negotiation Facility. Technical Report, OMG.
ProcessWise Integrator PML ReferenceManual. (1996). ICL/PW/635/0, Versions 4.1-4. 5, April.
Sichman, J. S., R. Conte, Y. Demazeau, and C. Castelfranchi. (1994). “A Social Reasoning Mechanism Based on Dependences Networks,” Proceedings of ECAI. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vercouter, L. (2000). “A Distributed Approach to Design Open Multi-agent Systems,” Proceedings of ESAW.
Wellman, M. P. and W. E. Walsh. (1999). “Modeling Supply Chain Formation in Multiagent Systems,” IJCAI-99 Workshop on AgentMediated Electronic Commerce.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castellani, S., Andreoli, J.M., Bratu, M. et al. E-Alliance: A Negotiation Infrastructure for Virtual Alliances. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 127–141 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023020905288
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023020905288