Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Physician/Patient Encounter from a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) offers benefit in rehabilitation, particularly with pain problems. Its conceptual basis and certain of its techniques fit well with the type of occupational rehabilitation that encourages patient involvement and comprehensive attention to impediments to reaching functional goals. The physician-patient encounter remains a pivotal force from the onset of illness or injury through rehabilitation and resolution. Communications within these encounters have been studied and linked to patient attitudes, perceptions, and health- related outcomes. There appears to be potentially useful conjunction between CBT principles and parameters of interest in the physician-patient encounter. Scientific attention to this conjunction is largely lacking. However, suggestions are offered that may enable physicians and other health care providers to apply CBT early in the course of illness, interact more effectively in a multi disciplinary team using CBT, or make more fruitful referrals to CBT practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Keefe FJ, Egert JR. A cognitive-behavioral perspective on pain in cumulative trauma disorders. In: Moon SD, Sauter SL, eds. Beyond biomechanics: Psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in the office work, London: Taylor and Francis, 1996, pp. 159-175.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McIntosh G, Melles T, Hall H. Guidelines for the identification of barriers to rehabilitation of back injuries. J Occup Rehab 1995; 5(3): 195-201.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gamsa A. The role of psychological factors in chronic pain: I. A half century of study. Pain 1994; 57: 5-15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamsa A. The role of psychological factors in chronic pain: II. A critical appraisal. Pain 1994; 57: 17-29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sullivan M, Turner J, Romano J. Chronic pain in primary care: Identification and management of psychosocial factors. J Fam Pract 1991; 32(2): 193-199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan S, Greenfield S, Ware J. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989; 27: S110-S127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waitzkin H. Doctor-patient communication: Clinical implications of social scientific research. J Am Med Assoc 1984; 252(17): 2441-2446.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allman RM, Yoels WC, Clair JM. Reconciling the agendas of physicians and patients. In: Clair JM, Allman RM, eds. Sociomedical perspectives on patient care. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky, 1993, pp. 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bensing J. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32(11): 1301-1310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roter D. Which facets of communication have strong effects on outcome—a meta-analysis. In: Stewart/Moria/Roter/Debra, eds. Communicating with medical patients. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989, pp. 183-196.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Inui TS, Carter WB, Kukull WA, Haigh VH. Outcome-based doctor-patient interaction analysis: I. Comparison of techniques. Med Care 1982; 20(6): 535-549.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lepper HS, Martin LR, DiMatteo MR. A model of nonverbal exchange in physician-patient expectations for patient involvement. J Nonverbal Behav 1995; 19(4): 207-222.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ong LML, DeHaes, JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40(7): 903-918.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freidin RB, Goldman L, Cecil RR. Patient-physician concordance in problem identification in the primary care setting. Ann Int Med 1980; 93: 490-493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shuy RW. Three types of interference to an effective exchange of information in the medical interview. In: Fisher S, Todd A, eds. The social organization of the doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beckman H, et al. Outcome-based research on doctor-patient communication: A review. In: Stewart MA, Roter DL, eds. Communicating with medical patients. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith CK, Polis, Hadac RR. Characteristics of the initial medical interview associated with patient satisfaction and understanding. J Fam Pract 1981; 12(2): 283-288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carter WB, Inui TS, Kukull WA, Haigh VH. Outcomes-based doctor-patient interaction analysis: II. Identifying effective provider and patient behavior. Med Care 1982; 20(6): 550-566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians' behaviors and analogue patients' satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care 1987; 25(5): 437-451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lebow JL. Consumer assessments of the quality of medical care. Med Care 1974; 12(4): 328-337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garrity TF. Medical compliance and the clinician-patient relationship. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15E: 215-222.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stewart MA. What is a successful doctor-patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes. Soc Sci Med 1984; 167.

  23. Kaplan, SH, Greenfield S, Ware J. Impact of the doctor-patient relationship on the outcomes of chronic disease. Stewart MA, Roter DL, eds. Communicating with medical patients. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart MA, McWhinney IR, Buck CW. The doctor-patient relationship and its effect upon outcome. J Royal Coll Gen Pract 1979; 29: 77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davis MS. Variations in patients' compliance with doctors' advice: An empirical analysis of patterns of communication. Am J Pub Health 1968; 58: 274-288.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Foreyt JP, Rathjen DP. Cognitive behavior therapy. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dobson KS. Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies. New York: Guilford Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sheldon B. Cognitive-behavioral therapy. London: Routledge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jensen M, Turner J, Romano J. Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62(1): 172-1799.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barsky AJ. Hidden reasons some patients visit doctors. Ann Int. Med 1981; 94(4): 492-497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Novak DH. Therapeutic aspects of the clinical encounter. J Gen Int Med 1987; 2: 346-355.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jensen M, Turner J, Romano J. Self-efficacy and outcome expectancies: Relationship to chronic pain coping strategies and adjustment Pain 1991; 44: 263-269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ashworth C, Wlliamson P, Montano D. A scale to measure physician beliefs about psychosocial aspects of patient care. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19(11): 1235-1238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hooper EM, Comstock LM, Goodwin JM, Goodwin JS. Patient characteristics that influence physician behavior. Med Care 1982; 20(6): 630-638.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Williamson P, Beitman BD, Katon W. Beliefs that foster physician avoidance of psychosocial aspects of health care. J Fam Pract 1981; 13(7): 999-1003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bertakis KD, Callahan EJ, Helms LJ, Azari R, Robbins JA. The effect of patient health status on physician practice style. Fam Med 1993; 25: 530-535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Street RL, Jr. Information-giving in medical consultations: The influence of patients' communicative style and personal characteristics. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32(5): 541-548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pilowsky I. Malingerophobia. Med J. Austr 1985; 143: 571-572.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Priel B, Rabinowitz B, Pels R. A semiotic perspective on chronic pain: Implications for the interaction between patient and physician. Br J Med Psychol 1991; 64: 65-71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Reid J, Ewan C, Lowy E. Pilgrimmage of pain: The illness experiences of women with repetition strain injury and the search for credibility. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32(5): 601-612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwab JJ. Handbook of psychiatric consultation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Quinter JL. The Australian RSI debate: Stereotyping and medicine. Disab Rebah 1995; 17(5): 256-262.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moon SD. A psychosocial view of cumulative trauma disorders: Implications for occupational health. In: Moon SD, Sauter SL, eds. Beyond biomechanics: Psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996, pp. 109-143.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mendelson G. Chronic pain and compensation: A review. J Pain Sympt Mgmt 1986; 1(3): 135-144.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Linton SJ, Bradley LA. An 18-month follow-up of a secondary prevention program for back pain: Help and hinderance factors related to outcome maintenance. Clin J Pain 1992; 8: 227-236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Melles T, McIntosh G, Hall H. Provider, payor, and patient outcome expectations in back pain rehabilitation. J Occup Rehab 1995; 5(2): 57-69.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Neimeyer LO. Social labelling, stereotyping, and observer bias in workers' compensation: The impact of provider-patient interaction on outcome. J Occup Rehab 1991; 14: 251-269.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brink NE. The power struggle of workers' compensation—strategies for intervention. J Appl Rehab Counsel 1989; 20(1): 25-28.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. The effects of compensation on recovery from low-back injury. Spine 1989; 14(9): 947-955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sander RA, Meyers JE. The relationship of disability to compensation status in railroad workers. Spine 1986; 11(2): 141-143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Beals RK. Compensation and recovery from injury. West J Med 1984; 140(2): 233-237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Derebery VJ, Tullis WH. Delayed recovery in the patient with a work compensable injury. J Occup Med 1983; 25(11): 829-835.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Catchlove R, Cohen K. Effects of a directive return to work approach in the treatment of workman's compensation patients with chronic pain. Pain 1982; 14: 181-191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gerrity MS, et al. Uncertainty and professional work: Perceptions of physicians in clinical practice. Am J Sociol 1992; 97: 1022-1051.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rest K, Patterson WB. Ethics and moral reasoning in occupational health. Sem Occup Med 1986; 49-57.

  56. McCunney RI, Brandt-Rauf P. Ethical conflict in the private practice of occupational medicine. J Occup Med 1991; 32: 80-82.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bigos SJ, Davis GE. Scientific application of sports medicine principles for acute low back problems. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Low Back Guideline Panel (AHCPR, Guideline: 14). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 24: 192-207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, S., Liu, J. The Physician/Patient Encounter from a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Perspective. J Occup Rehabil 8, 153–172 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023019823895

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023019823895

Navigation