Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid growth of electronic commerce, there is growing demand forremote online negotiations. Although the Internet now enables audio and video communication, most Web-based negotiation systems are still text-based. There is, however, a lack of research on the effects of multimedia on remote negotiations. In this paper, we present a theoretical model to investigate the impacts of multimedia communication in an online negotiation setting. The constructs in our model include communication efficiency, communication effectiveness, and positive and negative social-emotional communication. Through a simulated house purchasing negotiation experiment, we study how different multimedia combinations (text only; text with audio; text with audio and video) affect our constructs and thus further influence negotiation results. Our results showed that both text with audio and text with audio and video communication were significantly preferred to text alone. However, the addition of video to text and audio communication in a negotiation environment was not found to be beneficial. It did not significantly improve communication efficiency, effectiveness or positive social-emotional communication, but distracted negotiators from focusing on the negotiation task. Our analysis also revealed that the communication efficiency construct did not correlate with the perceived success of the negotiation solution; however communication effectiveness and social-emotional communication did correlate with negotiation satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, S. R. and S. R. Levitt. (1987). “Designing Videoconference Facilities for Improving Eye Contact,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 31, 181-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. H., L. Smallwood, R. MacDonald, J. Mullin, and A. Fleming. (2000). “Video Data and Video Links in Mediated Communication: What Do Users Value?,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52, 165-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anson, R. G. and M. T. Jelassi. (1990). “A Development Framework for Computer-Supported Conflict Resolution,” European Journal of Operational Research 46, 181-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily Communication, 2nd Ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, N. P., M. M. Head, J. P. Wollersheim, and Y. Yuan. (1996). “Investigation of Voice and Text Output Modes with Abstraction in a Computer Interface,” Interacting with Computers 8 (4), 323-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggett, P. and A. Ehrenfeucht. (1986). “Encoding and Retaining Information in the Visuals and Verbals in an Educational Movie,” Educational Communication Technology Journal 31 (3), 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. and J. Carroll. (1987). “Negotiator Cognition,” Research in Organizational Behavior 9, 247-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, P. and J. Laws. (1994). “Image Quality and Video Communication,” in R. Damper, W. Hall, and J. Richards (eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE international Symposium on Multimedia Technologies and their Future Applications. London: Pentech Press, 163-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beam, C. and A. Segev. (1998). “Automated Negotiations: A Survey of the State of the Art,” Berkeley, CA: University of California, Haas School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., and E. Schaefer. (1989). “Contributing to Discourse,” Cognitive Science 13, 259-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., and S. E. Brennan. (1991). “Grounding in Communication,” in L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. D. Teasely (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 127-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly September 13 (3), 319-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., and R. H. Lengel. (1986). “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design,” Management Science 32 (5), 554-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennehy, M. (2000). New Online Mediation Service, March 9, 2000, http://www.auctionwatch.com/awdaily/ dailynews/march00/1-030900.html

  • Dubrovsky, V. J., S. Kiesler, and B. N. Sethna. (1991). “The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups,” Human-Computer Interaction 6, 119-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. and N. Maccoby. (1964). “On Resistance to Persuasive Communications,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68 (4), 359-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J. and S. R. Hiltz. (1999). “An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results,” Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (3), 7-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, W. and M. S. Baum. (1997). Secure Electronic Commerce: Building the Infrastructure for Digital Signatures and Encryption. Prentice Hall.

  • Fortune, A. and S. E. Brodt. (2000). “Face-to-Face or Virtually, for the Second Time Around: The Influence of Task, Past Experience, and Media on Trust and Deception in Negotiation,” Duke University Working Paper.

  • Hiltz, S. R., K. Johnson, and M. Turoff. (1986). “Experiments in Group Decision Making: Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-Face versus Computerized Conferences,” Human Communication Research 13 (2), 225-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B., J. E. McGrath, and K. M. O'Connor. (1993). “Group Task Performance and Communication Technology,” Small Group Research 24, 307-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahai, S. and R. B. Cooper. (1999). “The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Agreement and Acceptance,” Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (1), 165-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsh, E. and J. Rifkin. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G. E. and S. J. Noronha. (1999a). “WWW-Based Negotiation Support: Design, Implementation, and Use,”Decision Support Systems 25, 135-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G. E. and S. J. Noronha. (1999b). “Negotiations in Electronic Commerce: Methodological Misconceptions and a Resolution,” http://interneg.org/interneg/ research/papers/ 1999/02.pdf.

  • Kinney, S. T. and A. R. Dennis. (1994). “Reevaluating Media Richness: Cues, Feedback, and Task,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science 4, 21-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K. H., I. Benbasat, and L. M. Ward. (2000). “The Role of Multimedia in Changing First Impression Bias,” Information Systems Research 11 (2), June, 115-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, G. and G. E. Kersten. (1999). “Negotiation in Electronic Commerce: Integrating Negotiation Support and Software Agent Technologies,” 29th Atlantic Schools of Business Conference with the 5th Annual Atlantic Canadian Operational Research Society Conference, October 21-23.

  • Mennecke, B. E., J. S. Valacich, and B. C. Wheeler. (2000). “The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis,” Group Decision and Negotiation 9, 507-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. and A. B. Hollingshead. (1993). “Putting the 'Group' Back in Group Support Systems: Some Theoretical Issues About Dynamic Processes in Groups With Technological Enhancements,” in L. M. Jessup and J. S. Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York: Macmillan, 78-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., J. Nadler, T. Kurtzberg, and L. Thompson. (2002). “Negotiating via Information Technology: Theory and Application,” Journal of Social Issues 58.

  • Mühlfelder, M., U. Klein, S. Simon, and H. Luczak. (1999). “Teams without Trust? Investigations in the Influence of Video-Mediated Communication on the Origin of Trust Among Cooperative Persons,” Behaviour and Information Technology 18 (5), 349-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, J. (2001). “Electronically-Mediated Dispute Resolution and E-Commerce,” Negotiation Journal 17, 333-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G. (1982). “Pictures, Audio and Print: Symbolic Representation and Effect on Learning,” Educational Communication Technology Journal 30 (3), 163-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnelly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., G. M. Olson, and D. K. Meader. (1995). “What Mix of Video and Audio is Useful for Remote Realtime Work?,” Proceedings of the conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver, CO, 362-368.

  • Phillips, G. M. and G. M. Santoro. (1989). “Teaching Group Discussion via Computer-Mediated Communication,” Communication Education 38, 151-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. and G. Love. (1987). “Electronic Emotion: Social-emotional Content in a Computer-Mediated Communication Network,” Communication Research 14 (1), 85-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, S. and S. Huff. (1988). “Factors of Success for End User Computing,” Communications of the ACM 31 (5), May, 552-561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T. and V. Lesser. (1995). “Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Framework,” 1st International Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco, 328-335.

  • Short, J., E. Williams, and B. Christie. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipior, J. C. and E. J. Garrity. (1992). “Merging Expert Systems with Multimedia Technology,” Data Base, Winter, 45-49.

  • Streeter, L. A. (1988). “Applying Speech Synthesis to User Interfaces,” in M. Helander (ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier, 321-343.

  • Sycara, K. P. (1993). “Machine Learning for Intelligent Support of Conflict Resolution,” Decision Support Systems 10, 121-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. (2000). Lawyers Offer New Online Arbitration Service, Financial Post, June, 2000. http://www.nationalpost.com/stories/000608/310980.html.

  • Trevino, L. K. and J. Webster. (1992). “Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication: Electronic Mail and Voice Mail Evaluation and Impacts,” Communication Research 19, 539-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1995) “Relational Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time,” Organization Science 6, 186-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. (1995). “Rethinking Video as a Technology for Interpersonal Communication: Theory and Design Implications,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 42, 501-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1997). “Experimental Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Communication: A Review,” Psychological Bulletin 84, 963-976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y. and M. Alavi. (2001). “Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus,” MIS Quarterly 25 (3), 371-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., S. Suarga, J. B. Rose, and N. A. Archer. (1998). “Web-based Negotiation Support System,” International Journal of Electronic Markets 8 (3), 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuan, Y., Head, M. & Du, M. The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 89–109 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023016804379

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023016804379

Navigation