Abstract
Administrative reform policies are often characterized by a large number of reform symbols. While these are generally aimed at furthering the legitimacy of the political leadership, they can have the opposite effect and generate problems in implementing reform practice. This paper starts by discussing the theory of reform symbols and relates it to theories of instrumental, negotiation and cultural features of reforms. We illustrate this discussion by analyzing interview data collected among the central political and administrative elite in Norway. The analysis shows the relevance of reform symbols even in Norway, a country with a reluctant reform tradition and few incentives for reform. The respondents often perceived reform symbols as negative, something that creates problems for the political leadership in reconciling symbols with practice and leads it to engage in “double-talk”. Political and administrative leaders on different levels have differing attitudes towards administrative reform symbols, reflecting different roles and perspectives. The conclusion is that symbols are a main feature of administrative reform but also that reforms are not only symbols. Symbols matter, but turning symbols into practice is not an easy task to do.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberbach, J.D., and T. Christensen. (2001). “Radical Reform in New Zealand: Crisis, Windows of Opportunities, and Rational Actors.” Public Administration 79(2), 404‐422.
Bislev, S., and D. Salskov-Iversen. (2001). “Globalization and Discursive Regulation: New Public Management.” Paper presented at the 16th Nordic Academy of Management Meeting, Uppsala, 16‐18 August 2001.
Bolman, L.G., and T.E. Deal. (1987). Modern Approaches to Understanding and Managing Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot, and P. Walsh. (1996). {tiPublic Management}: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Brunsson, N. (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations.Chichester: Wiley.
Brunsson, N., and J.P. Olsen. (1993). The Reforming Organization. London and New York: Routledge.
Christensen, T. (1991). Virksomhetsplanlegging. Myteskaping eller instrumentell problemløsning? (Operational planning. Manipulation of myths or instrumental problem-solving?). Oslo: TANO.
Christensen, T. (1994). Politisk styring og faglig uavhengighet (Political control and professional autonomy). Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.
Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. (1998). “Administrative Reform Policy: The Case of Norway.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 64, 457‐475.
Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. (eds.) (2001a). New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. (2001b). “Coping with Modern Leadership Roles—The Problematic Redefinition of Public Companies.” Paper presented at the 2001 Meeting of the IPSA Section of the Structure of Governance, University of Oklahoma, March 30‐31. Also Bergen: LOS-center. Working Paper 0107.
Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and P.G. Roness. (2002). “Increasing Parliamentary Control of the Executive? New Instruments and Emerging Effects.” Journal of Legislative Studies 8, 267‐296.
Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and L.R. Wise. (2001). ''Assessing Public Management Reform in Norway, Sweden and the United States of America.'' International Journal of Political Studies September, 01, 41‐70.
Christensen, T.,P. Lægreid, and L.R. Wise. (2002). “Transforming Administrative Policy.” Public Administration 80, 153‐170.
Christensen, T., and K.A. Røvik. (1999). “The Ambiguity of Appropriateness.” In M. Egeberg and P. Lægreid (eds.), {tiOrganizing Political Institutions}. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. (1991). “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality.” In W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Downs, G.W., and P.D. Larkey. (1986). The Search for Government Efficiency. From Hubris to Helplessness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Edelman, M. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Feldman, M.S., and J.G. March. (1981). “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 171‐186.
Forssell, A. (2000). “Reform Theory Meets New Public Management.” In T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.), New Public Management: Transforming Ideas and Practice. London: Ashgate.
Forster, G.D., and S.K. Snyder. (1989). “Public Attitudes towards Government: Contradictions, Ambivalence and the Dilemmas of Response.” In Report and Recommendations of National Commission of the Public Service. Washington D.C. pp. 19‐42.
Helgesen, S. (2001). “Management-by-Objective-and-Results: Implementing the 1996 Financial Management Regulation in Norwegian Central Government Administration.” Paper presented at the 17th EGOS Colloquium, Lyon July 5‐7.
Hood, C. (1997). The Art of the State. Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hood, C. (2001). “Control, Bargains and Cheating: The Politics of Public Service Reform.” Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 29‐September 2.
Hood, C., and M. Jackson. (1991). Administrative Argument. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Jacobsen, D.R. (1998). Diskurser som begrensende og mulighetsskapende. (Discourses as constraints and opportunities). Bergen: LOC-center. Working Paper 9832.
Lægreid, P. (2001a). “Transforming Top Civil Servant Systems.” In T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.), New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lægreid, P. (2001b). “Administrative Reforms in Scandinavia: Testing the Cooperative Model.” In B.C. Nolan (ed.), Public Sector Reform. An International Perspective. London: Palgrave.
Lægreid, P., and J.P. Olsen. (1984). “The Storting: A Last Stronghold of the Political Amateur.” In E.N. Suleiman (ed.), Parliaments and Parliamentarians in Democratic Politics. New York: Holmes & Meier.
Lægreid, P., and P.G. Roness. (1999). “Administrative Reform as Organized Attention.” In M. Egeberg and P. Lægreid (eds.), Organizing Political Institutions. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Lægreid, P., and P.G. Roness. (2003). “Administrative Reform Programs and Institutional Response in Norwegian Central Government.” In J.J. Hesse, C. Hood, and B.G. Peters (eds.), Paradoxes in Public Sector Reform. Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt.
March, J.G. (1986). “How We Talk and How We Act: Administrative Theory and Administrative Life.”: In T.J. Sergiovanni and J.E. Corbally (eds.), Leadership and Organizational Culture. New Perspectives on Administrative Theory and Practice. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
March, J.G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making. New York: The Free Press.
March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. (1983). “Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us About Government.” American Political Science Review 77(2), 281‐297.
March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics.New York: Free Press.
Marcussen, M. (2001). “The OECD: Transnational Regulation Through the Idea-Game.” Paper presented at the SCANCOR Workshop “Transnational Regulation and the Transformation of States.” Stanford University, 22‐23 June 2001.
Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. (1977). “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (September), 340‐363.
Meyer, M.W. (1979). “Organizational Structure as Signaling.” Pacific Sociological Review 22, 481‐500.
Naschold, F. (1996). New Frontiers in Public Sector Management. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Olsen, J.P. (1983). Organized Democracy. Political Institutions in a Welfare State—the Case of Norway. Bergen: Scandinavian University Press.
Olsen, J.P. (1988). “Administrative Reform and Theories of Organization.” In C. Campbell and B.G. Peters (eds.), Organizing Governance: Governing Organizations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Olsen, J.P. (1996). “Norway: Slow Learner—or Another Triumph of the Tortoise?” In J.P. Olsen and B.G. Peters (eds.), Lessons from Experience. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Olsen, J.P., and B.G. Peters. (1996). “Learning from Experience?” In J.P. Olsen and B.G. Peters (eds.), Lessons from Experience. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Perry, J.L. (1992). “The Merit Pay Reforms.” In P.W. Ingraham and D.H. Rosenbloom (eds.), The Promise and Paradox of Civil Service Reform. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. Boston: Pitman.
Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. (2000). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Premfors, R. (1998). “Reshaping the Democratic State: Swedish Experiences in a Comparative Perspective.” Public Adminstration 76(2), 141‐160.
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rainey, H.G. ( 1996). “Public Opinion Toward the Civil Service.” In H.A.-G.-M. Bekke, J.L. Perry, and T.A.J. Toonen (eds.), Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Roness, P.G. (2001). “Transforming State Employees' Unions.” In T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.), New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Røvik, K.A. (1996). “Deinstitutionalization and the Logic of Fashion.” In B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon (eds.), Translating Organizational Change. New York: de Gruyter.
Røvik, K.A. (1998). Moderne organisasjoner. Trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved tusen?rs-skiftet (Modern organizations. Trends in the organizational thinking at the turn of the millenium). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). “Imitating by Editing Success”. In B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon (eds.), Translating Organizational Change. New York: de Gruyter.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2001). National, International and Transnational Constructions of New Public Management.” In T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.), New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.
Skivenes, M.I. (2001). Forvaltningspolitikk og borgermedvirkning i politisk viljedannelse. (Administrative policy and citizens' participation in the formation of political will). Bergen: LOS-center.Working Paper 0111.
Stene, Ø. (2001). From Idea to Concept and Administrative Reform. Paper presented at the 17th EGOS Colloquium, Lyon, July 5‐7.
Tolbert, P.S., and L.G. Zucker. (1983). “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations. The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform 1880‐1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 22‐39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. Administrative Reform Policy: The Challenges of Turning Symbols into Practice. Public Organization Review 3, 3–27 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023002810428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023002810428