Skip to main content
Log in

Minimalism and Paradoxes

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues against minimalism about truth. It does so by way of acomparison of the theory of truth with the theory of sets, and considerationof where paradoxes may arise in each. The paper proceeds by asking twoseemingly unrelated questions. First, what is the theory of truth about?Answering this question shows that minimalism bears important similaritiesto naive set theory. Second, why is there no strengthened version ofRussell's paradox, as there is a strengthened Liar paradox? Answering thisquestion shows that like naive set theory, minimalism is unable to makeadequate progress in resolving the paradoxes, and must be replaced by adrastically different sort of theory. Such a theory, it is shown, must befundamentally non-minimalist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Austin, J. L.: 1950, 'Truth', Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 24, 111–129. Reprinted in Austin (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L.: 1961, J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1946, Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd edn, Victor Gollancz, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and J. Etchemendy: 1987, The Liar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P. A.: 1990, 'The Status of Content', Philosophical Review 99, 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1971, 'The Iterative Conception of Set', Journal of Philosophy 68, 215–232. Reprinted in Boolos (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1989, 'Iteration Again', Philosophical Topics 42, 5–21. Reprinted in Boolos (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1993, The Logic of Provability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1998, Logic, Logic, and Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1979, 'Semantical Paradox', Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–198. Reprinted in Martin (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S.: 1984, 'Toward Useful Type-Free Theories, I', Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 75–111. Reprinted in Martin (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S.: 1991, 'Reflecting on Incompletenes', Journal of Symbolic Logic 56, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1986, 'The Deflationary Conception of Truth', in G. MacDonald and C. Wright (eds.), Fact, Science and Morality, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 55–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1992, 'Critical Notice: Paul Horwich's Truth', Philosophy of Science 59, 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1994, 'Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content', Mind 103, 249–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. and M. Sheard: 1987, 'An Axiomatic Approach to Self-Referential Truth', Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 33, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzberg, M.: 2001, 'The Liar in Context', Philosophical Studies 103, 217–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzberg, M.: manuscript, 'Quantification and Realism'.

  • Grim, P.: 1991, The Incomplete Universe, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger, H. G.: 1970, 'Paradoxes of Grounding in Semantics', Journal of Philosophy 67, 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: 1990, Truth, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: 1994, 'The Essence of Expressivism', Analysis 54, 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F., G. Oppy, and M. Smith: 1994, 'Minimalism and Truth Aptness', Mind 103, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jech, T.: 1978, Set Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1975, 'Outline of a Theory of Truth', Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716. Reprinted in Martin (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. (ed.): 1984, Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V.: 1991, Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V.: 1992, 'Maximal Consistent Sets of Instances of Tarski's Schema (T)', Journal of Philosophical Logic 21, 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C.: 1974a, 'The Liar Paradox', Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 381–412. Reprinted in Parsons (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C.: 1974b, 'Sets and Classes', Noûs 8, 1–12. Reprinted in Parsons (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C.: 1983, Mathematics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1986, Philosophy of Logic, 2nd edn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1926, 'The Foundations of Mathematics', Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Second Series 25, 338–384. Reprinted in Ramsey (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1927, 'Facts and Propositions', Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 7, 153–170. Reprinted in Ramsey (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K.: 1999, 'Deflationary Truth and the Liar', Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 455–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1984, 'What is a Theory of Truth?', Journal of Philosophy 81, 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1999, Understanding Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1935, 'Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalizierten Sprachen', Studia Philosophica 1, 261–405. Translation by J. H. Woodger as 'The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages', in Tarski (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1983, J. Corcoran (ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, J. H. Woodger (trans.), 2nd edn, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1992, Truth and Objectivity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glanzberg, M. Minimalism and Paradoxes. Synthese 135, 13–36 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022999315312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022999315312

Keywords

Navigation