Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age

  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a decision aid designed to prepare patients of advanced maternal age for counseling about prenatal diagnostic testing. Setting: A regional genetics center. Design: A before/after study. Interventions: Participants used an audioguided workbook to learn about options and outcomes and to clarify personal risks, values, questions, and predispositions. Subjects: 21 women of advanced maternal age and 17 spouses. Main outcome measures: Knowledge of prenatal testing alternatives, decisional conflict, level of anxiety, and acceptability of the decision aid. Results: After using the decision aid, participants had significantly reduced decisional conflict (uncertainty) and a significant increase in knowledge. There was no effect on state or trait anxiety. More than three-quarters of participants were satisfied with the length, clarity, balance, and acceptability of the decision aid. Conclusions: The decision aid shows promise as a useful aid for preparing couples for counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, Mulley AG, Henderson JV, Wennberg JE (1995) Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med Care 33:771-782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn H, O'Connor AM (1996) Validation of client decision making instruments in the context of psychiatry Can J Nur Res 28:13-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke BM, Kolker A (1994) Directiveness in prenatal genetic counseling. Women's Health 22:31-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian College of Medical Geneticists and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (1993) Canadian guidelines for prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders: An update. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can (March Suppl.):15-39.

  • Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (1994) The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, Parsons E, Williams A (1996) Outcomes and process in genetic counseling. Clin Genet 50:462-469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather NT (1980) Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel V, Glazier R, Holzapfel S, Pugh P, Summers A (1996) Evaluating patient's knowledge of maternal serum screening. Prenat Diag 16:425-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel V, Glazier R, Summers A, Holzapfel S (1998) Psychological outcomes following maternal serum screening: A cohort study. Can Med Assoc J 159:651-656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Cross PK, Schreinemachers DM (1983) Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants. JAMA 249:2034-2038.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter AG, Thompson D, Speevak M (1987) Midtrimester genetic amniocentesis in eastern Ontario: A review from 1970 to 1985. J Med Genet 24:335-343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janis IL, Mann L (1979) Decision making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper JF, Mulley AG, Wennberg JE (1992) Developing shared decision making programs to improve the quality of health care. Qual Rev Bull June:183-190.

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Tradeoffs, Toronto, ON: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laupacis A (1996) Preventive therapies: Pros and cons. Can Med Assoc J 154:1510-1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine MN, Gafni A, Markham B, MacFarlane D (1992) A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preferences concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 117:53-58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michie S, Marteau T (1996) Genetic counselling: Some issues of theory and practice. In Marteau T, Richards M (eds) The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp. 104-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making 15:25-30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells G, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G, McPherson R, Drake ER, Hopman W, Mackenzie T (1998a) A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: Decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling 33:267-279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells G, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G, McPherson R, Drake ER, Hopman W, Mackenzie T (1998b) Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for post-menopausal women considering long term preventive hormone therapy. Medical Decision Making 18:295-303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauker SP, Pauker SG (1987) The amniocentesis decision: Ten years of decision analytic experience. Birth Defects 23:151-169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitz GF (1987) Evaluating decision-aiding technologies for genetic counseling. Birth Defects: Original Article Series 23:251-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothert M, Holmes-Rovner M, Rovner D, Kroll J, Breer L, Talarczyk G, Schmitt N, Padonu G, Wills C (1997) An educational intervention as decision support for menopausal women. Research in Nursing and Health 20:377-387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Luschene RE, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (1998) Census '96 Statistical Profile: Education Statistics for Ottawa, Ontario [Table]. Retrieved February 16, 1999, from the World Wide Web http//ww2.statcan.ca/english/profil/.

  • Thornton JG (1999) Parents' decision making about prenatal testing: The effect of giving information in different ways (Cochrane Review Protocol). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Vail A (1995) A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing. Br Med J 311:1127-1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tri-Council Working Group (1996) Code of Conduct for Research Involving Humans (draft). Ottawa, ON: Medical Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453-458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drake, E.R., Engler-Todd, L., O'Connor, A.M. et al. Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age. Journal of Genetic Counseling 8, 217–233 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022998415890

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022998415890

Navigation