Skip to main content
Log in

Feed intake and dietary preferences of sheep and goats offered hay and legume-tree pods in South Africa

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments were designed to investigate the effect of legume tree-pods and ensiling on the intake and relative palatability of six feeds by goats and sheep. In the first experiment, the feeds offered were pasture hay (Themeda triandra), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), pods of Acacia sieberiana, Acacia nilotica and Leucaena leucocephala. In the second, silage from the pods of A. sieberiana was included as the sixth feed in order to examine the effect of ensiling on intake and palatability since this process was devised as a means of detoxifying cyanogenic glocosides known to be present in the leaves and pods of this species. Intake (Ti) and relative palatability (Pi) were determined using 3 goats and 3 sheep in each experiment. Since the feeds had different dry matter contents, intake was expressed as a ratio of the quantity offered (Ti/Ai). Using the hay offered (A1) and intake (T1), as standard, relative palatability indices were calculated as Pi = (Ti/Ai)/(T1/A1) where i represented the other feeds. In experiment 1, goats consumed more hay than alfalfa or pods. Sheep consumed more leucaena than all the other feeds. In experiment 2, the intake of all feeds except nilotica increased over time. Hay and leucaena had the highest Pi for goats and sheep, respectively, in experiment 1. In experiment 2, silage from pods of A. sieberiana had the highest Pi while the ranking for goats remained unchanged. The nilotica meal had the lowest Pi in both experiments. Pi was affected (p > 0.0001) only by feed type in experiment 1 but in experiment 2, feed type, animal species and weight significantly (p > 0.01) affected Pi. The results show that the pods of L. leucocephala and A. nilotica were the most and least preferred by goats and sheep, respectively, and that ensiling significantly improved the intake and palatability of the pods of A. sieberiana. However, some feeds that are least preferred in times of abundance and variety could be relished during periods of scarcity and severe feed shortages, based on animal survival instinct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Methods Of Analyses. 15th edn. Arlington, VA, 40–50 and 237- 238.

  • Arnold G.W. 1966. The special senses in grazing animals. II. Smell, taste and touch and dietary habits. In: Harborne J.B. (ed.), Phytochemical Ecology. Academic Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker K. and Lohrmann J. 1992. Feed selection by goats on tropical semi-humid rangeland. Small Rum Res 8: 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Salem H., Nefzaoui A. and Abdouli H. 1994. Palatability of shrubs and fodder trees measured on sheep and dromadaries: Methodological approach. Anim Feed Sci Technol 46: 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt E.A. and Provenza F.D. 1996. The effect of an unfamiliar location on the consumption of novel foods and the persistence of a conditioned food aversion in sheep. J Anim Sci (accepted).

  • Cropper M.R. 1987. Growth and development of sheep in relation to feeding strategy. PhD Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early M.E. and Provenza F.D. 1998. Food flavour and nutritional characteristics alter dynamics of food preference in lambs. J Anim Sci 76: 728–734.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J. 1989. Food for Tolman: Cognition and cathexis in concert. In: Archer T. and Nilsson L. (eds), Aversion, avoidance and anxiety. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 45–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman A.E. 1995. Tannin analysis. Laboratory manual, Miami Uni, Oxford, Ohio, 66 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitho R.J., Umunna N.N., Nsahlai I.V., Tamminga S., Van Bruchem J., Hanson J. et al. 1996. Palatability of Multipurpose tree species: Effect of species and length of study on intake and relative palatability by sheep. Agrofor Syst 33: 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury J.A. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 626 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majak W. and Cheng K.J. 1987. Hydrolysis of the cyanogenic glycosides, amydalin, Prunassin and linamarin by ruminal microorganisms. Can J Ani Sci 67: 1133–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten G. 1969. Measurement and significance of forage palatability. Proc Nat Conf, Forage quality evaluation and utilization. Nebraska Center Cont. Educ, Lincoln, Niger, D-1 to D-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten G. 1978. The animal-plant complex in forage palatability phenomena. J Anim Sci 46: 1471–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwa A.T., Nsahlai I.V. and Bonsi M.L.K. 2001. The effect of feeding pods of multipurpose trees (MPTs) on the degradability of dry matter and cell wall constituents of maize stover and alfalfa incubated in the rumen of sheep. J Sci Food Agric (Accepted for publication on 22 June 2001).

  • Osafo E.L.K., Owen E., Said A.N., Gill M., McAllan A.B. and Sherington J. 1992. Feeding sorghum stover to Ethiopian, yearling cattle: Effects of amount of stover offered and cottonseed cake supplement on intake and growth. Anim Prod 54: 501 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Personius T.L., Wambolt C.L., Stephens J.R. and Kelsey R.G. 1987. Crude terpenoid influence on mule deer preference for sagebrush. J Range Manage 40: 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister J.A., Provenza F.D. and Manners G.D. 1990. Ingestion of tall larkspur by cattle: Separating the effects of flavour from postingestive consequences. J Chem Ecol 16: 1697–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provenza F.D., Lynch J.J. and Cheney C.D. 1995. Effects of a flavor and food restriction on the response of sheep to novel foods. Appl Anim Behav Sci 43: 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provenza F.D. 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J Range manage 48: 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos A. and Tennessen T. 1992. Effect of previous grazing experience on the grazing behaviour of lambs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 33: 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed J.D. 1995. Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related phenolics in forage legumes. J Anim Sci 73: 1516–1528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1987. Procedures Guide for Personal Computers. 6th edn. Statistical Analysis Systems Inst Inc, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigler D.S., Butterfield C.S., Dunn J.E. and Conn E.E. 1975. Dihydroacacipetalin - A new cyanogenic glycoside from Acacia sieberiana var. woodii. Phytochemistry 14: 1419–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terblanche M., Pienaar J.G., Bigalke R. and Vahrmeyer J. 1967. Acacia nilotica (L) Subsp. Kraussiana (Bentham) Branan. J South Afr Med Assoc 38: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. 1991. Methods of dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch monosaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74: 3583–3597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I.V. Nsahlai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ngwa, A., Nsahlai, I. & Bonsi, M. Feed intake and dietary preferences of sheep and goats offered hay and legume-tree pods in South Africa. Agroforestry Systems 57, 29–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022988200484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022988200484

Navigation