Skip to main content
Log in

To be continued . . . Syntheses and trends in follow-up of quality assurance in West European higher education

  • Published:
European Journal for Education Law and Policy

Abstract

The authors report on West European trends in follow-up arrangements of national quality assurance procedures. They argue that external quality assurance ought to adopt a broader conception of quality than is now often the case. Next, the general public ought to have a guarantee that external quality assurance is valid (through meta-evaluation) and has consequences (through follow-up arrangements). Follow-up currently is not well developed in many European countries in a formal sense, but is receiving more attention as external quality assurance is maturing. Finally, the authors link national quality assurance to the European dimension; an international network could fulfil important functions in making quality assurance transparent and credible across Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banta, T. et al. Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Goedegebuure, L.C.J., Westerheijden, D.F., Weusthof P.J.M. and Shah, T. Towards a Methodology for Comparative Quality Assessment in European Higher Education: A Pilot Study on Economics in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. London: CNAA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Frederiks, M. and Shah, T. Improving the Quality of Education: The Impact of Quality Assessment on Institutions. Milton Keynes: The Open University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee-Mertens. Aandacht voor de kwaliteit. Brussels: Department for Education, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groof, J. “To be Continued... From a Lawyer's Perspective,” in J.P. Scheele, P.A.M. Maassen and D.F. Westerheijden, To be Continued...: Follow-Up of Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Maarssen: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, M.M.H. et al. “Effects of Quality Assessment in Dutch Higher Education,” European Journal of Education29 (1994), 181-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kells, H.R. Self-Study Processes, 4th edn. New York: ACE/ McMillan, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P.A.M. and Vught, F.A. van. “An Intriguing Janus-head: The Two Faces of the New Governmental Strategy for Higher Education in the Netherlands,” European Journal of Education23 (1988), 65-77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. The Impact of the 1992 RAE on Institutional and Individual Behaviour in English Higher Education: The Evidence from a Research Project. Bristol: HEFCE, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. "On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe 1986-1988 (1988), European Journal of Education23, 7-23.

  • Neave, G. The Evaluative State: The Moment of Truth from an Imagined Spanish Perspective, Paper, CHER 10th Annual Conference, Alicante, September 18-20, 1997.

  • Neave, G. “To be Continued... Froma Historian's Perspective,” in J.P. Scheele, P.A.M. Maassen and D.F. Westerheijden, To be Continued...: Follow-Up of Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Maarssen: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, T. “Systematic Higher Education Assessment and Departmental Impacts: Translating the Effort to Meet the Need,” Quality in Higher Education1 (1995), 223-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheele, J.P., Maassen, P.A.M. and Westerheijden, D.F. To be Continued...: Follow-Up of Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Maarssen: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkleij, A. Because Every Situation is Different...: A contribution to the discussion of the pros and cons of large-scale research evaluations, paper, Confederation of European Union Rectors' Conferences (1998a), Brussels, 6 February.

  • Vroeijenstijn, A.I. Improvement and Accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis: Guide for External Quality Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vught, F.A. van and Westerheijden, D.F. Naar een stelsel van meervoudige accreditering? [Towards a System of Multiple Accreditation?]. Utrecht: Adviesraad voor het Onderwijs, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F. “A Solid Base for Decisions: Use of the VSNU Research Evaluations in Dutch Universities,” (1997), Higher Education33, 397-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weusthof, P.J.M. and Frederiks, M.M.H. “De functies van het stelsel van kwaliteitszorg heroverwogen,” Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs15 (1997), 318-338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Bruggen, J.C., Scheele, J.P. & Westerheijden, D.F. To be continued . . . Syntheses and trends in follow-up of quality assurance in West European higher education. European Journal for Education Law and Policy 2, 155–163 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022986005529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022986005529

Navigation